• 3 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 7 minutes "Leaked" request by some Democrats that they were asking Nancy to coordinate censure instead of impeachment.
  • 12 minutes Trump's China Strategy: Death By a Thousand Paper Cuts
  • 16 minutes Global Debt Worries. How Will This End?
  • 4 mins americavchina.com
  • 3 hours Tories on course to win majority
  • 18 hours DUMB IT DOWN-IMPEACHMENT
  • 20 hours POTUS Trump signs the HK Bill
  • 2 hours Greta named Time Magazine "Person of the Year"
  • 17 hours Winter Storms Hitting Continental US
  • 1 day WTO is effectively neutered. Trump *already* won the trade war against China and WTO is helpless to intervene
  • 11 hours Aramco Raises $25.6B in World's Biggest IPO
  • 18 hours China Burns More Coal than the Rest of the World !
  • 24 hours Everything you think you know about economics is WRONG!
  • 17 hours 2nd Annual Great Oil Price Prediction Challenge of 2019
Alt Text

Deal Or No Deal: Will The Oil Rally Continue?

U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude…

Alt Text

An Oil Market On Edge

Oil prices were up to…

Alt Text

The Oil Bulls Are Back Despite Bearish Fundamentals

The announcement of a “phase…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

Canada’s Oil Crisis Is Far From Over

Alberta decided to extend its mandatory production cuts through the end of 2020 because of a lack of pipeline capacity.

The former New Democratic Premier Rachel Notley imposed the curtailments, but the current United Conservative Premier Jason Kenney is extending them. “We’re doing this because we have to. In the short term, we don’t have the capacity to move the production,” Alberta Energy Minister Sonya Savage told reporters in Calgary.

The cuts were controversial, but succeeded in trimming the supply glut and sharply pushing up prices for Western Canada Select (WCS), which had plunged to less than $15 per barrel prior to the announcement.

Alberta has been steadily and gradually unwinding the mandatory limits this year, and by October, the limits will drop to roughly 100,000 bpd, down from 325,000 bpd initially.

But chronic pipeline delays prevent a full lifting of the cuts. The delay of the Line 3 replacement in particular has surprised provincial authorities. The replacement is slated to double the existing line’s throughput, and was supposed to come online at the end of 2019, but it has been pushed off until late 2020 at the earliest. Indigenous and environmental groups continue to oppose the project, so more delays are possible.

The decision to extend the mandatory cuts presents “upside risk” to WCS price forecasts, according to a report from Goldman Sachs. There will also be a “ceiling” on the WCS discount relative to WTI, “as free markets will be less able to function and drive differentials toward the marginal cost of crude-by-rail transportation,” Goldman analysts wrote. Related: Brazil Government Looks To Fully Privatize Petrobras By 2022

Goldman had originally forecasted a WCS price discount of $17.50-per-barrel relative to WTI in the third quarter, $20 in the fourth quarter, and $21 in 2020. It has not yet updated its forecast to incorporate the extension of the mandatory curbs by Alberta, but noted that the discounts will be narrower than originally anticipated. Shipping oil by rail implies a discount of around $15-$17 per barrel, Goldman said.

Forthcoming regulations on sulfur content in marine fuels by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) are also negative for Canada’s heavy oil. Beginning in 2020, the market for high-sulfur fuels is set to shrink, and that could show up with a greater discount for WCS.

Production curbs from Alberta is a “net positive” to cash flow though, with higher WCS prices offsetting the pain of lower output, the investment bank said. Suncor is Goldman’s “top pick” in terms of Canadian oil stocks. At the same time, the cuts are negative for refiners, who have less oil to work with and higher prices.

While Alberta has stabilized the market, the lack of pipelines continues to be a drag on Canada’s oil industry. “Longer-term, we think this results in a deferral of growth capex in the industry, most notably Imperial’s Aspen project, Canadian Natural’s Horizon expansion and debottlenecking projects, and Suncor’s in-situ replication projects and Fort Hills debottlenecking,” Goldman Sachs said. “Given this, we expect 2020 capex budgets to fall relative to initial expectations, and increased deleveraging and capital returns to materialize.”

“We expect limited project sanctions to take place until production curtailments are lifted and greater clarity is achieved around export pipelines,” Goldman said. Related: Subsea Sector Could Lose Big If Oil Prices Plunge

In fact, since the 2014 oil market meltdown, Alberta has seen an exodus of investment and capital. Major international oil companies have mostly exited Alberta’s oil industry altogether. The latest example is Kinder Morgan’s decision to sell off its remaining holdings in Canada to Pembina Pipeline Co. for about $3.3 billion. Bloomberg estimates that Canada has seen roughly $30 billion in divestitures in the past three years. Total capital expenditures have declined for five straight years.

The negatives for Canadian oil are multiple: Pipeline bottlenecks, heavier and lower quality oil, mandatory production cuts, high sulfur content, and high-cost and carbon-intensive oil that is increasingly a target in the global efforts to address climate change.

Trans Mountain Corp. has restarted construction on the Trans Mountain Expansion, more than a year after it ran into a brick wall of delays. The federal government essentially nationalized the project in 2018 after Kinder Morgan wanted to exit, and court orders suspended construction. The project still has permits outstanding, but the government-owned corporation hopes to obtain those in the coming months. If all goes according to plan, the pipeline could be operational by mid-2022.

“If they thought things were getting better in Canada, they might hold on, but they don’t see things getting better,” Laura Lau, of Brompton Corp. in Toronto, told Bloomberg in an interview. “The pipeline situation is getting worse; everything is getting worse.”

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Robert Inget on August 23 2019 said:
    China and Russia will use Venezuelan and Canada's "high sulfur content, and high-cost and carbon-intensive oil" as a bludgeon to destroy USD$ as the world's exchange currency.

    Everyone takes Canadian crude for granted the same way we took Venezuela's nearby supply.
    One phone call from Putin to Trump and Venezuela is sanctioned, not intervened.

    The single factor remains, light shale makes lousy jet fuel, diesel or heating oil.
    Saudi /XOM GOM refineries were set up for Venezuelan or Canadian crude.
    We can argue why Canada and the US chose TransMountain instead of XL.
    The fact is Canada is America's # 1 #2 and #3 crude oil provider.

    IF, if, China succeeds in replacing USD as the world's exchange currency,
    Canada (and export negative Mexico) will doubtless stick with USD along with Ecuador and Central America.
  • Dave Simson on August 27 2019 said:
    On the BC coast they logged all the best giant Doug Firs when they were worth less than two dollars each, after dragging the huge beasts to water. That's how we failed at playing the long game.

    Leave the damned oil in the ground until the price is really high. It's just cooking the planet too fast anyway.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play