The Oil Age has powered the world for well over a century. There have been two general schools of thought about how it will ultimately end.
There were those who believed that oil production would peak and begin to decline in the face of high global demand. This is essentially the peak oil argument, which many laymen mistakenly understand as “The world is running out of oil.”
In reality, the argument wasn’t that the world was going to run out of oil, it was that oil production would begin a long decline and cause havoc in a world that is still highly dependent upon oil.
This version of the end of oil became very popular just before the shale oil boom. The idea was neatly summarized in 2005 when the late Matt Simmons published Twilight in the Desert, in which he argued that oil production in Saudi Arabia was nearing terminal decline.
In this version, there is no easy replacement for oil, so oil prices skyrocket above $100 a barrel (bbl) as people seek to maintain mobility. In fact, for a while it looked like this version might play out.
But growing shale oil production largely burst that bubble in 2014, when it became clear that there was still a lot of oil to be produced.
Fast forward a few years, and a new version of the end of oil began to take hold. In this version, exponential increases in electric vehicles (EVs) and ride-sharing are predicted to be two key factors that will make oil obsolete.
In this version, oil prices plunge as demand starts to fall. This is the exact opposite of the peak oil argument, where oil prices surge as supply starts to fall.
As Michael Liebreich, the founder and senior contributor of Bloomberg New Energy Finance, recently put it on Twitter: “I’ve always said the end-game for oil is not when it reaches $200/barrel, it’s when it settles at $20/barrel.”
I felt like it would be likely that we would see some combination: A period of shortages and high prices, but ultimately a peak in demand that would lead to lower prices. I wrote an article nearly three years ago outlining that view. However, I felt like that point was probably a decade away. And it would be highly dependent on whether U.S. shale oil production continued to grow.
One thing the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has done is to collapse oil demand, and subsequently prices. The world still needs oil during this crisis, but what we are seeing today is exactly what I think we would see in the peak demand scenario.
In that case, we will see the need for a much smaller oil industry. And that is likely where we are headed now, with oil prices in the $20s, and the timing of a recovery still uncertain.
I believe what we saw in the 2005-2014 time frame was a preview of the peak oil scenario. Oil company revenues were skyrocketing during this period, and energy stocks were one of the best-performing sectors.
But today, we are seeing a preview of the peak demand scenario. That outcome is very different. In this scenario, only the strongest oil companies survive, and the sector becomes one most investors would rather avoid.
Are we there yet? I don’t think so, but it is hard to say what the lingering impact on oil demand will be from the coronavirus pandemic. When oil demand dropped during the 2008-2009 financial crisis, it bounced back strongly in 2010. I am not so sure that’s going to happen this time. This pandemic seems destined to change our world in a number of ways, and some of those ways involve lower oil demand.
If that transition starts to happen in earnest, then the peak demand scenario that I thought we would see in maybe 2030 will be here a lot sooner than that.
By Robert Rapier
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
- Rig Count Collapse Continues Despite Historic Global Oil Deal
- OPEC+ Deal Won’t Solve The Oil Storage Crisis
- Oil Prices Tank Despite 10 Million Barrel Per Day Production Cut
The often quoted statement attributed to the former Saudi oil minister Sheikh Ahmad Zaki Yamani that “the Stone Age came to an end not for lack of stone and the Oil Age will end long before we run out of oil” is not accurate. The Stone Age has never ended. It is still with us to this very minute in the form of the stones we continue to use to build houses, bridges and monuments. What has ended is only an aspect of the Stone Age, namely tool-making from stone, which has been substituted for practicability by bronze and metal tool-making with the advent of metalworking, namely, smelting of Bronze and Iron.
The same logic applies to oil. There could never be a post-oil era nor a peak oil demand either throughout the 21st century and far beyond because it is very doubtful that an alternative as versatile and practicable as oil, particularly in transport, could totally replace oil in the next 100 years and beyond. Oil will continue to reign supreme throughout the 21st century and far beyond.
The global economy is made of three ingredients, namely, global investment, the oil and gas industry and the economies of the oil-producing nations of the world. Each one of them is dependent on oil. Without oil, there will be no global economy as we know it.
Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
International Oil Economist
Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
Oil looks to be headed into a multiyear glut. Even if consumption volume were to pick up, this does not mean that prices will head back to $60/b or whatever attract serious investment in production growth.
Consumption of underpriced surplus is not real demand, just the elasticity of demand. What enabled OPEC to extract high prices in the past was very inelastic demand. In 2009-2014, highly inelastic demand meant that consumers where willing to pay upwards of $100/b to keep expanding the supply of oil. And that was high enough to tech breakthroughs in shale production. But today it seems rather unlikely that consumers would pay $100/b to add 1 mb/d to supply. Why should they? RE, batteries, EVs, and even natural gas provide much cheaper alternatives than $100/b for a marginal 1 mb/d of oil supply. Even fuel efficiency gains in autos were able to surrender consumption in OECD countries prior to 2015 in lieu of paying $100/b. Other technologies like teleconferencing enable a whole globe to stay connected while remaining at home.
The point here is that for a high enough price, consumers are willing and able to cut consumption. Demand is increasingly elastic. So the question becomes, how long do producers want to oversupply the market and suffer low prices? Total crude revenue peaked years ago. It&#039;s not coming back.
The answer remains as clear as it was before this crisis - CCUS and CCS putit in the ground as we have done with other wastes for years, including nuclear. Support this industry don’t write articles that deny the needs of the population.
Is that not worth $8/month?
A few specialized cars making grocery deliveries is a lot more fuel efficient than thousands of cars on the move. Coronavirus is teaching us to keep our cars in the garage and it is making consumers aware of better ways of doing things.
Americans have an obsession with the automobile myself included! I used to own a Duramax diesel truck that I loved! I just got tiered of spending $80-100 on fuel every time I filled it up!
sold it and bought a Tesla. I came to the conclusion that E/V are the cars of the future, there will still be gas cars around 10-20 years from now but the vast majority will be electric. Just like the horse and buggy were back in the 20s.