• 4 minutes Your idea of oil/gas prices next ten years
  • 7 minutes WTI Heading for $60
  • 13 minutes Could EVs Become Cheaper than ICE Cars by 2023?
  • 1 day Pence says South China Sea Doesn't Belong To Any One Nation
  • 7 hours Is California becoming a National Security Risk to the U.S.?
  • 2 days Anyone holding Nvidia stock?
  • 21 hours Why does US never need to have an oil production cut?
  • 4 hours US continues imports of Russian gas which it insists Europe should stop buying
  • 2 days Germany Discusses Lifting Ban on Deporting Syrians
  • 2 days China Claims To Have Successfully Developed a Quantum Radar That Can Detect 'Invisible' Fighter Jets
  • 1 hour Pros and Cons of Coal
  • 2 days UK Power and loss of power stations
  • 8 hours Trump administration slaps sanctions on Saudis over Khashoggi's death
  • 2 days I Believe I Can Fly: Proposed U.S. Space Force Budget Could Be Less Than $5 Billion
  • 2 days OPEC Builds Case For Oil Supply Cut
  • 24 hours Commission: U.S. Could Lose Wars With Russia, China
Alt Text

Why There Won’t Be An OPEC For Battery Metals

A very dynamic market, quickly…

Alt Text

The Boy Genius Tackling Energy’s Toughest Problem

This 23-year old nuclear physicist…

MINING.com

MINING.com

MINING.com is a web-based global mining publication focusing on news and commentary about mining and mineral exploration. The site is a one-stop-shop for mining industry…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Moon Fuel: A New Multi-Trillion Dollar Treasure

India’s space program wants to go where no nation has gone before – to the south side of the moon. And once it gets there, it will study the potential for mining a source of waste-free nuclear energy that could be worth trillions of dollars.

The nation’s equivalent of NASA will launch a rover in October to explore virgin territory on the lunar surface and analyze crust samples for signs of water and helium-3. That isotope is limited on Earth yet so abundant on the moon that it theoretically could meet global energy demands for 250 years if harnessed.

“The countries which have the capacity to bring that source from the moon to Earth will dictate the process,’’ said K. Sivan, chairman of the Indian Space Research Organisation. “I don’t want to be just a part of them, I want to lead them.’’

The mission would solidify India’s place among the fleet of explorers racing to the moon, Mars and beyond for scientific, commercial or military gains. The governments of the U.S., China, India, Japan and Russia are competing with startups and billionaires Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos and Richard Branson to launch satellites, robotic landers, astronauts and tourists into the cosmos.

The rover landing is one step in an envisioned series for ISRO that includes putting a space station in orbit and, potentially, an Indian crew on the moon. The government has yet to set a timeframe.

The mission would solidify India’s place among the fleet of explorers racing to the moon, Mars and beyond for scientific, commercial or military gains. Related: Hefty Inventory Draw Boosts Oil Prices

“We are ready and waiting,’’ said Sivan, an aeronautics engineer who joined ISRO in 1982. “We’ve equipped ourselves to take on this particular program.’’

China is the only country to put a lander and rover on the moon this century with its Chang’e 3 mission in 2013. The nation plans to return later this year by sending a probe to the unexplored far side.

In the U.S., President Donald Trump signed a directive calling for astronauts to return to the moon, and NASA’s proposed $19 billion budget this fiscal year calls for launching a lunar orbiter by the early 2020s.

ISRO’s estimated budget is less than a 10th of that – about $1.7 billion – but accomplishing feats on the cheap has been a hallmark of the agency since the 1960s. The upcoming mission will cost about $125 million – or less than a quarter of Snap Inc. co-founder Evan Spiegel’s compensation last year, the highest for an executive of a publicly traded company, according to the Bloomberg Pay Index.

This won’t be India’s first moon mission. The Chandrayaan-1 craft, launched in October 2008, completed more than 3,400 orbits and ejected a probe that discovered molecules of water in the surface for the first time.

The upcoming launch of Chandrayaan-2 includes an orbiter, lander and a rectangular rover. The six-wheeled vehicle, powered by solar energy, will collect information for at least 14 days and cover an area with a 400-meter radius.

The rover will send images to the lander, and the lander will transmit those back to ISRO for analysis.

A primary objective, though, is to search for deposits of helium-3. Solar winds have bombarded the moon with immense quantities of helium-3 because it’s not protected by a magnetic field like Earth is.

The presence of helium-3 was confirmed in moon samples returned by the Apollo missions, and Apollo 17 astronaut Harrison Schmitt, a geologist who walked on the moon in December 1972, is an avid proponent of mining helium-3.

There are an estimated 1 million metric tons of helium-3 embedded in the moon — enough to meet the world’s current energy demands for at least two, and possibly as many as five, centuries.

“It is thought that this isotope could provide safer nuclear energy in a fusion reactor, since it is not radioactive and would not produce dangerous waste products,’’ the European Space Agency said.

There are an estimated 1 million metric tons of helium-3 embedded in the moon, though only about a quarter of that realistically could be brought to Earth, said Gerald Kulcinski, director of the Fusion Technology Institute at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and a former member of the NASA Advisory Council.

That’s still enough to meet the world’s current energy demands for at least two, and possibly as many as five, centuries, Kulcinski said. He estimated helium-3’s value at about $5 billion a ton, meaning 250,000 tons would be worth in the trillions of dollars.

To be sure, there are numerous obstacles to overcome before the material can be used – including the logistics of collection and delivery back to Earth and building fusion power plants to convert the material into energy. Those costs would be stratospheric.

“If that can be cracked, India should be a part of that effort,’’ said Lydia Powell, who runs the Centre for Resources Management at the New Delhi-based Observer Research Foundation think tank. “If the cost makes sense, it will become a game-changer, no doubt about it.’’

Plus, it won’t be easy to mine the moon. Only the U.S. and Luxembourg have passed legislation allowing commercial entities to hold onto what they have mined from space, said David Todd, head of space content at Northampton, England-based Seradata Ltd. There isn’t any international treaty on the issue.

“Eventually, it will be like fishing in the sea in international waters,’’ Todd said. “While a nation-state cannot hold international waters, the fish become the property of its fishermen once fished.’’

Related: Tehran: Taking Iran’s Oil Out Of The Market Is ‘Impossible’

India’s government is reacting to the influx of commercial firms in space by drafting legislation to regulate satellite launches, company registrations and liability, said GV Anand Bhushan, a Chennai-based partner at the Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co. law firm. It doesn’t cover moon mining.

Yet the nation’s only spaceman isn’t fully on board with turning the moon into a place of business.

Rakesh Sharma, who spent almost eight days aboard a Russian spacecraft in 1984, said nations and private enterprises instead should work together to develop human colonies elsewhere as Earth runs out of resources and faces potential catastrophes such as asteroid strikes.

“You can’t go to the moon and draw boundaries,’’ Sharma said. “I want India to show that we’re capable of utilizing space technology for the good of people.’’

By Mining.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Bill Simpson on June 28 2018 said:
    It sounds cool, but is unlikely to ever happen.
    Nobody has built any type of fusion reactor which produces more energy than it uses. Some nuclear physicists say the helium - 3 route to fusion is unlikely to ever work. It is far from a done deal.
    Even if fusion can be done, which I doubt since duplicating the center of a star won't be easy, the process must produce electricity which is cheaper than all the other methods of doing it. Other than in stars and in the supernova explosions when they die, the only other place fusion exists is inside incredibly expensive lab machines, and inside H-bombs for a billionth of a second from radiation implosion produced by a fission bomb before everything has chance to blow apart. Good luck replicating such extreme conditions continuously inside some machine. It has proven easier said than done for 60 years, despite billions spent on the effort.
    Mining on the moon and returning material back to Earth would cost trillions of dollars. Where is such an enormous amount of money, with payback decades in the future, going to come from? The moon is an extremely hostile environment. It has no atmosphere, fuels, or liquid water. The surface gets hit by radiation, both from the Sun, and from deep space. Should you be on the moon and a solar flare erupt, sending material toward the moon, you are dead without serious shielding. Three Apollo astronauts escaped getting killed by about a week on one of the six Apollo flights. Moon 'dust' is essentially tiny razor sharp glass fragments. It gets everywhere and wears away seals quite fast. Inside any building with an atmosphere, air currents will suspend it, which will let it be inhaled, since the gravity on the moon is only 1/6 of the gravity on Earth. Inside a pressurized building the dust won't instantly drop to the surface, like you see on the Apollo films. The only reason the dust settled instantly on the moon's surface was because there is no atmospheric resistance to stop it going down. Inside any air filled building will be a different story. Inhaling coal or rock dust can cause lung disease after decades. Inhaling sharp particles of glass won't take long to do permanent lung damage. Stopping that from happening won't be cheap. Nor will replacing seals on equipment which it will grind away. You can't wash it off, because there is no water to do that. Cleaning on the moon will be a real bummer. Imagine what a gallon of clean water would cost on the moon.
    Nights on the moon are extremely cold. Without heating, a human inside a space suit or pressurized vehicle would soon freeze. Any water lines would rupture unless heated.
    Just imagine the cost of mining in a complete vacuum. Imagine the hassle of repairing any mining equipment. Space suits cost millions, and require a lot of maintenance. Any malfunction on the outside means death. They wear out, just like other machines, only they are far more delicate and complex than most machines.
    NASA, and exceptional men with 'the right stuff', made the moon landings look easy during the Apollo program. As the next group who goes there will discover, it wasn't as easy as it appeared.
  • Steve on June 28 2018 said:
    "To the moon!"
    Only it won't be to mine potential energy sources. It will be to give exponentially-increasing debt a big blast-off into the stratosphere from which it will never return. And, of course, it's "for the good of the people" (and the corporate oligarchs that will 'benefit' from such an endeavour).
  • Frank Anderson on July 09 2018 said:
    Even if the fuel is free, the cost of electricity (power and energy) from a fusion plant that costs 3 times or more than a fission plant in use or to be built today, will be unaffordable. There is enough heavy water in a cubic mile of sea water, of which there are millions of cubic miles, to meet the entire energy needs of the Earth for about 1,000 years. If you don't care what it costs don't ask. Then when the bill comes in don't complain. Going to the moon is a waste for this boondoggle, as are most "alternative energy" projects. Until each alternative is examined for cost and compared honestly it is a clear case of the blind leading the blind.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
-->