• 4 minutes England Running Out of Water?
  • 7 minutes Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 10 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 14 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 39 mins Tidal Power Closer to Commercialisation
  • 9 hours Why U.S. Growers Are Betting The Farm On Soybeans Amid China Trade War
  • 14 hours US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 23 hours BATTLE ROYAL: Law of "Supply and Demand". vs. OPEC/Saudi Oil Cartel
  • 1 hour Read: OPEC THREATENED TO KILL US SHALE
  • 6 hours Fisker Announces 'Mass Market' Electric SUV
  • 1 day Solar to Become World's Largest Power Source by 2050
  • 2 days Sounds Familiar: Netanyahu Tells Arab Citizens They’re Not Real Israelis
  • 2 days THE DEATH OF FOSSIL FUEL MARKETS
  • 24 hours Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
  • 2 days Boeing Faces Safety Questions After Second 737 Crash In Five Months
  • 2 days Can OPEC CUT PRODUCTION FOREVER?
The Oil Majors Aiming To Save Alaska’s LNG Dreams

The Oil Majors Aiming To Save Alaska’s LNG Dreams

Just when regulators and energy…

Big Oil Is Backing Methane Regulation

Big Oil Is Backing Methane Regulation

The oil industry appears to…

Russia, Ukraine To Discuss Latest Gas Dispute By End-March

Crimea

Ukraine’s state-held gas company Naftogaz and Russia’s gas giant Gazprom will meet by the end of March to discuss the new dispute over gas supplies between the two countries, the Ukrainian company said on Twitter.

At the end of February, the Stockholm arbitration court ruled in favor of Naftogaz in the payment dispute with Gazprom, ordering the Russian company to pay Naftogaz US$2.56 billion for failing to supply Ukraine with the agreed amount of natural gas over a period of several years and also for failing to pay the full transit fees for the gas it did pump in that direction.

Hours after the court ruling, a fresh gas dispute flared up after Naftogaz said that Gazprom had not stood by its commitment to resume gas supplies, forcing Ukraine to reduce gas usage amid Arctic temperatures. The new rift comes after years of bitter disputes between the gas companies of Russia and Ukraine, exacerbated by the 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea.

Gazprom, for its part, expressed its disagreement with the Stockholm arbitration ruling and said that “Gazprom will defend its rights through all means available under applicable legislation.”

Gazprom wants to terminate the contracts with Naftogaz, while the Ukrainian company said on Twitter that it “sees no need to cancel the contracts” and at the upcoming meeting by the end of March, the parties would discuss Naftogaz’s proposal to revise the transit tariffs. The Stockholm court ruling will also be discussed, Naftogaz said, adding that “We expect payment.”

Related: Is Another Oil Price War Looming?

Gazprom, on the other hand, thinks that “The Stockholm arbitration tribunal handed down an asymmetrical ruling that undermined the balance of interests between the parties to the two contracts – the contract for gas supplies to Ukraine and the transit contract,” Alexey Miller, Chairman of the Gazprom Management Committee, told Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev earlier this week.

“At this juncture, those contracts have become economically unsound, unviable for us, which is why Gazprom has decided to start the procedure to terminate the contracts through the Stockholm arbitration tribunal. We have already filed an appeal regarding the contract for gas supplies to Ukraine. Before the end of March, an appeal will be filed for the transit contract and proceedings will be initiated to terminate the contracts in accordance with established procedure,” Miller told the Russian prime minister.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News