• 5 minutes Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 11 minutes Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
  • 15 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 2 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 2 mins Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 2 hours Again Google: Brazil May Probe Google Over Its Cell Phone System
  • 17 hours Tesla Faces 3 Lawsuits Over “Funding Secured” Tweet
  • 4 hours Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 17 mins Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 21 hours Why hydrogen economics does not work
  • 10 hours Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 1 day The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 13 hours California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 1 hour WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 1 day WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 13 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
Global Energy Advisory – 10th August 2018

Global Energy Advisory – 10th August 2018

U.S. shale producers have been…

Is Saudi Arabia Misleading The Oil Market?

Is Saudi Arabia Misleading The Oil Market?

Saudi Arabia has been the…

Court Rules In Favor of Ukraine’s Naftogaz In Gazprom Dispute

Gazprom

The Stockholm arbitration court ruled in favor of Naftogaz in a long-running payment dispute between the Ukrainian state company and Russia’s Gazprom. Gazprom has been obliged to pay Naftogaz US$2.56 billion for failing to supply Ukraine with the agreed amount of natural gas over a period of several years and also for failing to pay the full transit fees for the gas it did pump in that direction.

The Ukrainian company’s victory is pyrrhic, however: of the original US$4.63 billion in payments due by Gazprom, the Stockholm court ruled that only US$2.56 billion would actually be paid out to Naftogaz, as Naftogaz had previously been ordered to pay about $2 billion to Gazprom for arrears. The court also obliged Naftogaz to buy 5 billion cu m of natural gas from the Russian company annually starting this year.

Gazprom acknowledged the ruling, but said it created a “material imbalance, which infringes the basic principles of Swedish law, which regulates the (gas) contract” adding that “Gazprom will defend its rights by all available means in accordance with the applicable law.”

Hours after the ruling was made public by Naftogaz, Gazprom’s CEO Alexander Medvedev said the company had received payment from the Ukrainian company for gas to be pumped its way this month, but had returned it. The reason is that the two companies have yet to sign a supplement to their original contract reflecting the court’s ruling.

Related: Analysts Expect Oil Prices To Rise This Year

Ukraine is Russia’s main gas transit route to Europe, but bilateral relations have been strained for quite a while. Events heated up in 2014 after Russia annexed Crimea after a referendum, and after it backed pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine.

Adding to the problems is Gazprom’s Nord Stream 2 gas project that will divert a significant portion of gas from the Ukrainian transit route, causing Kiev will lose billions in transit fees.

Yesterday Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Nord Stream 2 was not an alternative to Ukraine. After a meeting with Austrian Chancellor Sebastian Kurz, Putin said "If Ukraine presents economically grounded factors for using its gas transportation system, we have nothing against continuing cooperation with Ukraine. The question is only in the volumes of pumping.”

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Murf on April 17 2018 said:
    "Pyrrhic Victory"?
    They get out of having to pay 50 billion and in stead are getting 2 billion back.
    That sound like a clear victory.
    Not to mention GAZPROM has tried to use their gas cut off blackmail tactic to no avail.
    All it did was display GAPROMs unreliability as a supplier.
    There is another victory.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News