• 2 minutes Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 5 minutes Middle East on brink: Oil tankers attacked off Oman
  • 8 minutes CNN:America's oil boom will break more records this year. OPEC is stuck in retreat
  • 53 mins Here We Go: New York Lawmakers Pass Aggressive Law To Fight Climate Change
  • 1 hour The Inconvenient Truth Of Electric Cars
  • 2 hours Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Completely Destroy their Economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 9 hours California and Oil
  • 11 hours Win Against Tyranny: Turkey's Opposition Strikes Blow To Erdogan With Istanbul Mayoral Win
  • 2 hours Ireland To Ban New Petrol And Diesel Vehicles From 2030
  • 11 hours Green vs. Coal: Bavaria Seeks Fast-Track German Coal Exit in Snub to Merkel Plan
  • 3 hours NATO Article 5: Attack on one member is attack on all. Members all must come to defense . . . NOT facilitate financial transactions to circumvent and foil US Sanctions. Somebody please tell Angela.
  • 7 hours The Plastics Problem
  • 1 hour Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 5 hours Hydrogen FTW... Some Day
  • 4 hours Oil Demand Needs to Halve: Equinor
  • 1 hour Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 15 hours Fareed Zakaria: Canary in the Coal Mine (U.S. Dollar Hegemony)
  • 2 hours Wonders of Shale - Gas, bringing investments and jobs to the US
Alt Text

Expect More Bearish News For Oil

A very bearish inventory report…

Alt Text

Oil Holds Steady Amid Small Rig Count Decline

Oil prices held steady on…

Alt Text

Oil Just Had Its Worst Run Since 2008

Oil prices have entered bear…

Peter Tertzakian

Peter Tertzakian

Peter is an economist, investment strategist, author and public speaker on issues vital to the future of energy. He has clocked over 30 years of…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Oil Prices Could Double If Middle East Conflict Escalates

Barrel traders recently pushed the price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil above $US 55; the first time in over two years.

Scarcity doesn’t really justify the upward price movement. There isn’t a shortage of oil in the world. But there could be, in the worst case, if missiles start flying between two of the world’s largest oil players: Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Maybe it won’t happen. But maybe it will. And that’s what the “geopolitical risk premium” is all about. It’s an anxiety surcharge that’s tacked onto every barrel of oil, in fear of supply disruption on a moment’s notice. And the fear is back.

After three years of naivety we’re back to acknowledging the known unknowns of the Middle East, the uncertainties that strap a 10-to-20 percent premium on the price of a barrel.

Paying a risk premium for oil is nothing new. It’s been around for decades and has gone up and down with the hostility thermometer of the Middle East.

Unusually, the pricing of risk dropped to zero around 2015. Three main reasons prompted a sense of world peace: the promise of the Iranian nuclear deal; a feeling that booming oilfields in Texas could offset any disruption; and a growing surplus of oil inventories in storage tanks around the world.

Of late, the notion of oil obsolescence has also perpetuated a feeling of nonchalance. “Who cares about the Middle East and their oil?” has been a question driven by the utopian narrative: “I’m not worried, everyone will be driving electric cars in a few years anyway.” Related: Oil Tycoon Hamm Slams EIA’s Overoptimistic Shale Forecasts

But it’s all been a false sense of security.

Electric cars are still rare. Oil remains vital to the world economy. Its geographic concentration is such that a large proportion of the world’s needs is produced from underneath layers of geopolitics, religious antagonism, authoritarianism, civil strife and corruption.

When I reflect on the extremes of oily politics, I pull out my old copy of Life Magazine from 1973, the year of the Arab oil embargo. Back then, in a rare moment of unity, Arabs came together to curtail oil shipments to the west, demanding that Israel cede lands it captured in the 1967 war.

I’m struck by the two-page spread showing a Dutch freeway that’s completely empty, not a car on the road due to widespread gasoline and diesel shortages. The disruption was less than three percent of world supply and lasted only a few months, but it was enough to momentarily paralyze transportation in affected countries—and change attitudes about energy security too. The fallout led to big changes in personal mobility—smaller cars, greater fuel economy and alternate modes of transport like high-speed rail—especially in Europe and Japan.

Juxtaposed on the fuel-starved image is a photo inset of a meeting between various leaders of the embargo. The snapshot is taken at a moment with lots of laughter, suggesting the not-so-subtle message that they were pleased with their destabilizing accomplishment. Maybe.

But no one is laughing now. Regional animosity is elevated, the weaponry is lethal and it’s hard to figure out allegiances and regional political ambitions. And the scale of consequence is bigger too: In 1973 oil consumption was almost 56 million barrels a day. Today it’s pushing 100 million bpd, with a quarter flowing through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow, strategic chokepoint between Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Related: Why Saudi Arabia Should Fear U.S. Oil Dominance

The geopolitical premium is likely to increase over the next year. Oil markets are slowly heading back towards what OPEC calls “balance” and global inventories are gradually draining. The calculus is pretty simple: Progressively thinner margins for error, plus greater risk of disruption, equals more volatile prices to the upside.

If oil supply is pinched again, for whatever machination or military operation, the price of a barrel could easily double (prices quadrupled as a result of the 1973 embargo). And 20 years from now we may look back at a magazine spread of a freeway, this time showing a handful of cars—only the electric variety.

Higher oil prices are generally welcomed by petroleum producers and their upstream stakeholders. Yet amplified volatility and the potential of another oil crisis is a greater friend to purveyors of electric vehicles; they are the natural beneficiaries to their rival’s instability.

By Peter Tertzakian for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Paul on November 16 2017 said:
    Hybrid cars make more sense economically than electric because they require no public infrastructure beyond upgrading the national electric grid. Why would anyone think that electric cars even have a chance before we see more widespread adaptation of hybrid vehicles?
  • Al on November 17 2017 said:
    A very realistic view of the current crude oil picture. I would add that a short-term price spike could indeed drive oil above $200......
  • spin on November 17 2017 said:
    I think this will happen, maybe not in the time frame talked about but given the history of oil pricing it has rarely been stable for long. Private consumers can eat a lot of these price fluctuations and traditionally companies have had no choice but their competitors haven't either. With the advent of EV buses and trucks if company A is EV based and their costs are stable with the price of electricity and company B is ICE based and they have to try to eat a large price spike only company A is going to survive.
  • Noel on November 17 2017 said:
    Before Henry ford rolled out his petrol combustion cars in Ireland 1917 there were electric vehicles taxis in London. But ev were expensive awkward slow to refill. And still are 100 years later.
  • snoopyloopy on November 17 2017 said:
    @Paul: Hybrids are in many ways the worst of both worlds since they have two powertrains and generally haven't had an extremely compelling operational savings argument over ICEs and they're similarly compromised in comparison to EVs now hitting the market today. The plug-in hybrids do bridge the gap a little, though. Still, EVs offer the simplicity of electric drive and with Tesla setting the halo rather high now with the Roadster II in regard to performance, it quickly becomes evident how much better cars they are. Once that information really disseminates into the public, they will accept nothing less. Of course, the autonomous fleets are also going to be electric because anything that relies on an ICE makes no sense for a fleet operator.
  • REALIST on November 19 2017 said:
    "large proportion of the world’s needs is produced from underneath layers of geopolitics, religious antagonism, authoritarianism, civil strife and corruption."

    Do you mean the US or Middle East?
  • the masked avenger on November 21 2017 said:
    Al.. keep living in your dream world. 200 would skid the world economy to a screeching halt. Big oils dominance is quickly diminishing. All spikes do is lower the price of alternatives nd drive innovation. Big oils greef is setting the stage for its demise.
  • white owl on November 22 2017 said:
    Electricity is not free. The more draw off the grid the higher goes the cost. And what do you think is powering the grid, solar? Not likely. Not nearly enough hydro power & nuke plants are being shut down in the west. That leaves natural gas, oil & COAL. Power is power & oil is not going away it's just getting a little more competition.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News