• 5 minutes USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 10 minutes Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 13 minutes U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 16 minutes IEA Sees Global Oil Supply Tightening More Quickly In 2019
  • 45 mins Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 8 hours $867 billion farm bill passed
  • 8 hours Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 7 hours Has Global Peak Diesel Arrived?
  • 1 day OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 24 hours Sleeping Hydrocarbon Giant
  • 20 hours How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 2 hours What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 1 hour Air-to-Fuels Energy and Cost Calculation
  • 1 day And the War on LNG is Now On
  • 1 day Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 24 hours Could Tesla Buy GM?
Alt Text

Why We Should Worry About Low Oil Prices

Though the consensus is that…

Alt Text

Oil Prices Crash As OPEC+ Scrambles At 11th Hour

Oil prices headed lower on…

Alt Text

Do Falling Oil Prices Help Or Hurt The U.S.?

One of the biggest fallacies…

Peter Tertzakian

Peter Tertzakian

Peter is an economist, investment strategist, author and public speaker on issues vital to the future of energy. He has clocked over 30 years of…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Oil Prices Could Double If Middle East Conflict Escalates

Barrel traders recently pushed the price of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil above $US 55; the first time in over two years.

Scarcity doesn’t really justify the upward price movement. There isn’t a shortage of oil in the world. But there could be, in the worst case, if missiles start flying between two of the world’s largest oil players: Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Maybe it won’t happen. But maybe it will. And that’s what the “geopolitical risk premium” is all about. It’s an anxiety surcharge that’s tacked onto every barrel of oil, in fear of supply disruption on a moment’s notice. And the fear is back.

After three years of naivety we’re back to acknowledging the known unknowns of the Middle East, the uncertainties that strap a 10-to-20 percent premium on the price of a barrel.

Paying a risk premium for oil is nothing new. It’s been around for decades and has gone up and down with the hostility thermometer of the Middle East.

Unusually, the pricing of risk dropped to zero around 2015. Three main reasons prompted a sense of world peace: the promise of the Iranian nuclear deal; a feeling that booming oilfields in Texas could offset any disruption; and a growing surplus of oil inventories in storage tanks around the world.

Of late, the notion of oil obsolescence has also perpetuated a feeling of nonchalance. “Who cares about the Middle East and their oil?” has been a question driven by the utopian narrative: “I’m not worried, everyone will be driving electric cars in a few years anyway.” Related: Oil Tycoon Hamm Slams EIA’s Overoptimistic Shale Forecasts

But it’s all been a false sense of security.

Electric cars are still rare. Oil remains vital to the world economy. Its geographic concentration is such that a large proportion of the world’s needs is produced from underneath layers of geopolitics, religious antagonism, authoritarianism, civil strife and corruption.

When I reflect on the extremes of oily politics, I pull out my old copy of Life Magazine from 1973, the year of the Arab oil embargo. Back then, in a rare moment of unity, Arabs came together to curtail oil shipments to the west, demanding that Israel cede lands it captured in the 1967 war.

I’m struck by the two-page spread showing a Dutch freeway that’s completely empty, not a car on the road due to widespread gasoline and diesel shortages. The disruption was less than three percent of world supply and lasted only a few months, but it was enough to momentarily paralyze transportation in affected countries—and change attitudes about energy security too. The fallout led to big changes in personal mobility—smaller cars, greater fuel economy and alternate modes of transport like high-speed rail—especially in Europe and Japan.

Juxtaposed on the fuel-starved image is a photo inset of a meeting between various leaders of the embargo. The snapshot is taken at a moment with lots of laughter, suggesting the not-so-subtle message that they were pleased with their destabilizing accomplishment. Maybe.

But no one is laughing now. Regional animosity is elevated, the weaponry is lethal and it’s hard to figure out allegiances and regional political ambitions. And the scale of consequence is bigger too: In 1973 oil consumption was almost 56 million barrels a day. Today it’s pushing 100 million bpd, with a quarter flowing through the Strait of Hormuz, a narrow, strategic chokepoint between Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Related: Why Saudi Arabia Should Fear U.S. Oil Dominance

The geopolitical premium is likely to increase over the next year. Oil markets are slowly heading back towards what OPEC calls “balance” and global inventories are gradually draining. The calculus is pretty simple: Progressively thinner margins for error, plus greater risk of disruption, equals more volatile prices to the upside.

If oil supply is pinched again, for whatever machination or military operation, the price of a barrel could easily double (prices quadrupled as a result of the 1973 embargo). And 20 years from now we may look back at a magazine spread of a freeway, this time showing a handful of cars—only the electric variety.

Higher oil prices are generally welcomed by petroleum producers and their upstream stakeholders. Yet amplified volatility and the potential of another oil crisis is a greater friend to purveyors of electric vehicles; they are the natural beneficiaries to their rival’s instability.

By Peter Tertzakian for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Paul on November 16 2017 said:
    Hybrid cars make more sense economically than electric because they require no public infrastructure beyond upgrading the national electric grid. Why would anyone think that electric cars even have a chance before we see more widespread adaptation of hybrid vehicles?
  • Al on November 17 2017 said:
    A very realistic view of the current crude oil picture. I would add that a short-term price spike could indeed drive oil above $200......
  • spin on November 17 2017 said:
    I think this will happen, maybe not in the time frame talked about but given the history of oil pricing it has rarely been stable for long. Private consumers can eat a lot of these price fluctuations and traditionally companies have had no choice but their competitors haven't either. With the advent of EV buses and trucks if company A is EV based and their costs are stable with the price of electricity and company B is ICE based and they have to try to eat a large price spike only company A is going to survive.
  • Noel on November 17 2017 said:
    Before Henry ford rolled out his petrol combustion cars in Ireland 1917 there were electric vehicles taxis in London. But ev were expensive awkward slow to refill. And still are 100 years later.
  • snoopyloopy on November 17 2017 said:
    @Paul: Hybrids are in many ways the worst of both worlds since they have two powertrains and generally haven't had an extremely compelling operational savings argument over ICEs and they're similarly compromised in comparison to EVs now hitting the market today. The plug-in hybrids do bridge the gap a little, though. Still, EVs offer the simplicity of electric drive and with Tesla setting the halo rather high now with the Roadster II in regard to performance, it quickly becomes evident how much better cars they are. Once that information really disseminates into the public, they will accept nothing less. Of course, the autonomous fleets are also going to be electric because anything that relies on an ICE makes no sense for a fleet operator.
  • REALIST on November 19 2017 said:
    "large proportion of the world’s needs is produced from underneath layers of geopolitics, religious antagonism, authoritarianism, civil strife and corruption."

    Do you mean the US or Middle East?
  • the masked avenger on November 21 2017 said:
    Al.. keep living in your dream world. 200 would skid the world economy to a screeching halt. Big oils dominance is quickly diminishing. All spikes do is lower the price of alternatives nd drive innovation. Big oils greef is setting the stage for its demise.
  • white owl on November 22 2017 said:
    Electricity is not free. The more draw off the grid the higher goes the cost. And what do you think is powering the grid, solar? Not likely. Not nearly enough hydro power & nuke plants are being shut down in the west. That leaves natural gas, oil & COAL. Power is power & oil is not going away it's just getting a little more competition.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News