• 5 minutes Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 11 minutes IEA Sees Global Oil Supply Tightening More Quickly In 2019
  • 14 minutes Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 6 hours U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 7 hours Waste-to-Energy Chugging Along
  • 27 mins Let's Just Block the Sun, Shall We?
  • 11 mins Alberta govt to construct another WCS processing refinery
  • 11 hours What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 11 hours Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 20 hours UK Power and loss of power stations
  • 1 day Zohr Giant Gas Field Increases Production Six-Fold
  • 6 hours Regular Gas dropped to $2.21 per gallon today
  • 14 hours Contradictory: Euro Zone Takes Step To Deeper Integration, Key Issues Unresolved
  • 1 day Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
  • 2 hours Sane Take on the Russia-Ukraine Case
  • 24 hours No, The U.S. Is Not A Net Exporter Of Crude Oil
  • 20 hours EPA To Roll Back Carbon Rule On New Coal Plants
  • 35 mins Sleeping Hydrocarbon Giant
Alt Text

Citi: Oil Prices Are Going Nowhere Next Year

Brent crude could be stuck…

Alt Text

Canadian Crude Price Spike Won’t Last

The price spike in Canadian…

Alt Text

Morgan Stanley Slashes Oil Price Forecast For 2019

Investment bank Morgan Stanley has…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Goldman Sachs: Oil Prices Won’t Hit $100

$100 oil is suddenly all the rage, but some analysts remain unconvinced.

The supply outages in Iran combined with the decision by OPEC+ not to take further action to offset the declines pushed Brent to multi-year highs this week, and led to a flurry of calls for $100 oil before the year is out. Bank of America Merrill Lynch even wondered if a 2008-style price spike was in the offing.

Not everyone is getting so carried away. Barring another unexpected supply outage, the market should ride out the year just fine, according to Goldman Sachs.

“[W]e believe another supply catalyst beyond Iran would likely be needed for prices to meaningfully break to the upside,” Goldman analysts wrote in a note. “In particular, we continue to expect that production from other OPEC producers and Russia will offset losses out of Iran, as has been the case so far.”

The investment bank sees Brent “stabilizing back in their $70-80/bbl range into year-end.”

The analysis is notable since Goldman has often been a little more at the bullish end of pricing forecasts. The bank’s analysts went to lengths to emphasize that it is not pessimistic on oil prices, and it maintains its “overweight” outlook on oil and other commodities.

Goldman admitted that Iran’s supply losses have mounted much faster than expected, having dropped about 0.65 million barrels per day (mb/d) since April. More losses are expected with sanctions set to take effect in early November. Iran’s oil exports to Europe, Japan and South Korea have already plunged to “negligible” levels. China has cut some purchases from Iran.

Crucially, the latest news from India suggests that Indian refiners are going to be much more cautious than expected. On Tuesday, Bloomberg reported that India, at least as of now, is set to cut oil imports from Iran close to zero in November, going far beyond what nearly all oil market analysts – and even top Indian officials – thought was possible. Bloomberg noted that Indian Oil Corp. and Bharat Petroleum Corp., the two largest refiners in India, have not booked any cargoes from Iran for November. A few other Indian refiners have also declined to secure November deliveries. That could change, but these companies would need to finalize purchases by early October for November delivery. Related: Brent Oil Breaks Its Post-Crash High

“Iranian exports may drop below 1 million barrels a day in November, with Indian refiners potentially loading nothing and China cutting back as well,” Amrita Sen of Energy Aspects Ltd. said in a note.

Still, Goldman Sachs says this isn’t a reason to panic. “The decline occurred faster than we had expected, although some Iranian production is likely being exported through Iraq, with Basra loadings up 0.3 mb/d over the same period,” Goldman analysts argued. “While we adjust our Iran export path to re?ect this faster decline, this has no impact on our oil balance as we continue to expect that the rest of OPEC will offset such losses.”

Right on cue, Libya’s oil production just rose to a five-year high at 1.28 mb/d.

Increasing output from Iraq, Saudi Arabia and Russia have led aggregate OPEC+ production to come in higher than expected. Plus, the pledge from OPEC+ to return to 100 percent compliance suggests another 0.5 mb/d could be on the way. Saudi Arabia has already hinted that it would ramp up production in September and October as Iranian supply goes offline. To top it off, production from the Neutral Zone between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait could come back online, adding another 0.3 mb/d by the first quarter of 2019, Goldman says.

Finally, Iran is losing output faster than expected, but the trajectory of the losses is unclear. Goldman notes that the new sanctions-busting financing vehicle setup by the EU, with the support of China and Russia, could help Iran mitigate some of the losses. Related: $100 Oil Is A Distinct Possibility

The key question could be the timing and the magnitude of the potential increases from OPEC+. In the past, OPEC has had a tendency of reacting to production losses, rather than “front-running” those outages, as Goldman notes. So, its latest decision to do nothing should not come as a surprise.

The downside of waiting too long is that OPEC may respond late to a run up in prices, allowing a price spike to occur. In the past, the cartel has produced more supply just as the oil market takes a turn for the worse, and the extra barrels exacerbate the bust.

The Wall Street Journal reports that this time around, OPEC+ may be aware of this trap, and recognizing that demand could soften later this year and especially in early 2019, the group wants to avoid adding too much supply. OPEC’s view is that the market is not in danger of overtightening because in the first quarter of 2019, demand could dip by some 600,000 relative to August levels.

In other words, OPEC doesn’t believe more supply is needed. Saudi Arabia could unilaterally add production, calibrating increases in response to what it thinks the market needs. But for now, OPEC+ doesn’t think a major increase in production is necessary and doesn’t appear concerned about a price spike.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Dan on September 26 2018 said:
    Well, Goldman's been wrong so far.
  • Mamdouh G Salameh on September 27 2018 said:
    It is fake news about supply outage in Iran. Contrary to claims cited in this article, Iranian oil exports have not declined at all. The claim that they did is no more than cheap psychological warfare that will not wash. Iranian oil exports to China, India, Turkey and the European Union have not declined by a single barrel.

    And contrary to what Goldman Sachs is projecting, oil prices could hit $100 a barrel.
    Two major factors are enhancing the bullishness of the global oil market with oil prices boosted accordingly.

    One factor is that the fundamentals of the global oil market are robust enough to support an oil price rising even beyond $85 before the end of the year possibly rising to $100.

    The second factor is that the OPEC meeting in Algiers acknowledged in no uncertain terms that OPEC members and Russia can’t increase their production beyond the reported combined increase in production of some 650,000 barrels a day (b/d) by Saudi Arabia (400,000 b/d) and Russia (250,000 b/d). That is why oil prices surged to more than $80 a barrel in the aftermath of the meeting. President Trump’s pressure on OPEC to raise its production has so far failed miserably.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Scott on September 27 2018 said:
    Dr. Salameh,

    Do you think the need short and long term for frac sand in the USA will stabilize or continue to grow?
  • Mitch on September 27 2018 said:
    It took over a year of brent moving up and down on production outages that are the same issues now being talked about moving brent from 80 to 100, with Iran sanctions being the only new wrinkle. OPEC+ is looking to move things back to 100% compliance incase the Iran sanctions bite harder than anticipated. However, there is plenty in storage as the more difficult spare capacity is brought online, and what a better time to drain than at 52 week highs. I'm sure some buyers want to see how the trade war/EM currency destruction plays out on demand of refined products.

    Normal seasonal demand declines during Q1 are about a month away from the front contract. Any lack of outages in Libya, Nigeria, or Venezuela production holding steady will bring things back down. OPEC could still do away with the production cut agreement for 2019 if prices did spike to 100. Iraq would do all they could to increase production/resell Iranian crude

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News