For several years, at least since Donald Trump became president more than two years ago, the U.S. has insisted that American sourced liquefied natural gas (LNG) is the answer for Europe’s gas diversification needs, particularly a long-needed pivot away from geopolitically charged Russian pipeline gas.
Moreover, U.S. claims that its LNG is the answer for European gas and energy security needs have caused rifts in EU-US relations, particularly relations between longtime allies Washington and Berlin. In a televised meeting with reporters and NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg before a NATO summit in Brussels last year, Trump said, referring to the controversial Nordstream 2 gas pipeline project, that it was “very inappropriate” that the U.S. was paying for European defense against Russia while Germany, the biggest European economy, was supporting gas deals with Moscow.
Since that time Berlin has been the first to blink as it promised to develop more LNG infrastructure and procure not only more U.S. but Qatari and other producers’ gas. However, the country is still pushing through with the Nordstream 2 project. The Russian-led $11 billion gas pipeline will stretch some 759 miles (1,222 km), running on the bed of the Baltic Sea from Russian gas fields to Germany, bypassing existing land routes over Ukraine, Poland and Belarus. It would double the existing Nordstream pipeline’s current annual capacity of 55 bcm and is expected to become operational by the end of next year.
New headwinds for U.S. LNG ambitions
Now, the U.S. energy patch may have another hurdle to overcome, which also intersects the largest LNG market in the world - the Asia Pacific region which accounts for 72 percent of global LNG demand. On Wednesday at an LNG conference in Moscow, Shell's Senior Deal Lead Stuart Bradford said Russian LNG is well positioned to compete with North American projects to reach new markets in Asia and the Atlantic Basin despite challenges. He added that Russian LNG can offer several location options - the planned capacity expansion at the Sakhalin plant, the Arctic with Yamal LNG and Arctic LNG 2 projects led by Russian Novatek, and the Baltic coast, with the Baltic LNG project. Related: U.S., Canadian Rig Count Plunges As Oil Retreats
However, he also said that North American projects benefit from lower capital expenditures, from so-called “special relationships” as well as being supported by lower tax regimes, than their Russian project counterparts. Bradford added that the commercial arrangements in North America are implemented on "basis risks," with gas prices based on the well-established Henry Hub, adding that competition is healthy. "Shell is convinced that Russia LNG can commit to these challenges." However, Bradford’s comments need to be taken in light of Shell’s participation in the fledgling Russian LNG sector. The company, the world’s largest corporate LNG buyer and seller, is currently involved in two Russian LNG projects: Baltic LNG and Sakhalin-2.
Shell is also forecasting that LNG sales will spike this year. Last month, the Anglo-Dutch oil major forecast that global LNG trade will rise 11 percent to 354 million tonnes this year as new facilities in Australia, the U.S., Russia and elsewhere increase supplies to Europe and Asia. More countries are also building LNG import or receiving terminals. Shell said that LNG trade rose by 27 million tonnes last year, with Chinese demand growth accounting for 16 million tonnes of those volumes. However, some of this demand growth will not only come from China, but India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Thailand, and in time the Philippines, and Vietnam. The Philippines and Vietnam, however, have yet to construct their first LNG receiving terminals.
By Tim Daiss for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
- Refiners Prepare To Profit From Dramatic Oil Product Switch
- Trump’s Last Chance To Subdue Gasoline Prices
- U.S. ‘’Oil Weapon’’ Could Change Geopolitics Forever
Now with LNG, Russia in spite of US sanctions has succeeded in this sphere too. Since the salaries and most of spending is done in rubles, but the export earnings are in dollars, domestic production and transit costs have declined due to a weakened ruble, and its not surprise that large Russian metals and energy companies have all earned impressive profits in 2017 and 2018.
US LNG and oil require a certain level of political coercion (and even trade blackmail) as is seen in the case of Germany and China. It is these that are politicized since they don't do well in a free market competition, which generally is reduced to price.