• 2 minutes Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 5 minutes Middle East on brink: Oil tankers attacked off Oman
  • 8 minutes CNN:America's oil boom will break more records this year. OPEC is stuck in retreat
  • 5 hours Here We Go: New York Lawmakers Pass Aggressive Law To Fight Climate Change
  • 1 min The Inconvenient Truth Of Electric Cars
  • 3 hours Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Completely Destroy their Economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 3 hours Oil Demand Needs to Halve: Equinor
  • 7 hours Ireland To Ban New Petrol And Diesel Vehicles From 2030
  • 5 hours Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 2 hours Solar Panels at 26 cents per watt
  • 8 hours NATO Article 5: Attack on one member is attack on all. Members all must come to defense . . . NOT facilitate financial transactions to circumvent and foil US Sanctions. Somebody please tell Angela.
  • 7 hours Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 8 hours Wonders of Shale - Gas, bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 4 hours Hydrogen FTW... Some Day
  • 3 hours Section 232 Uranium
  • 45 mins Huge UK Gas Discovery
  • 4 hours The Plastics Problem
  • 44 mins Green vs. Coal: Bavaria Seeks Fast-Track German Coal Exit in Snub to Merkel Plan
Alt Text

OPEC Agrees To Schedule Meeting On July 1-2

After weeks of disagreements, conflicting…

Alt Text

Global Oil Market Surprisingly Oversupplied

Despite OPEC oil production cuts…

Alt Text

Libya’s Oil Production Could Double Within 5 Years

Frequent field outages and security…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

The Oil Industry Is Facing A "Capex Conundrum"

Oil industry executives are surely pleased with themselves this year, with both large and small companies reporting improved financials after years of struggling.

A Reuters survey finds a significant shift towards profitability for the U.S. shale industry after years of rising debt and negative cash flow. Reuters analyzed 32 independent shale companies, and about a third of them were cash flow positive in the third quarter. That may not seem all that great, but only three companies out of those 32 had positive cash flow a year earlier.

In fact, years of cost cutting is paying off for many companies, many of which have aimed to breakeven with oil prices at $50 or $60 per barrel. Not all are there, to be sure, but the increase of oil prices this year pushed many into profitable territory. The oil majors, on the other hand, are the most profitable they have been in years.

The big question now is what do they do with the windfall? Spend more in order to grow production or return excess cash to shareholders? This is shaping up to be one of the defining questions of this new oil era, especially for the largest oil companies.

To be sure, just about every oil executive trumpets their commitment to capital discipline when they get the chance. Wall Street clearly favors this approach. In the past, growth was the name of the game, and share prices rose and fell on growth in production and reserves. These days, profits and cash flow come first.

Last week, the Wall Street Journal pointed out the different stock performances of companies that pursue these different strategies. Over the past year, ExxonMobil’s share price has been flat, as it has announced an aggressive spending plan and multi-year campaign to grow production. Meanwhile ConocoPhillips is shrinking, selling off assets, and focusing on shale drilling and shareholder returns. Exxon’s share price is flat, but Conoco has jumped by 25 percent. Related: The Saudis Are Hinting At Another U-Turn In Oil Markets

However, pursuing a strategy that prescribes returning every surplus dollar to shareholders is a recipe for long-term decline. The industry is “caught in a capex conundrum,” according to Tom Sanzillo and Kathy Hipple of the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis.

Already the oil majors are slipping. “In 2008, the energy sector commanded roughly 16% of total Standard and Poor’s 500 market capitalization. Today, that figure has fallen to roughly 6%,” Sanzillo and Hipple wrote in a commentary. “In 1980, seven of the top 10 companies in the index were oil companies. Today, only ExxonMobil is in the top 10 (ranking tenth).”

The uptick in oil prices over the first nine months of this year has buoyed optimism and led some companies to begin to ratchet up spending. It remains to be seen if that turns out to be a mistake, but the latest plunge in oil prices is a reminder of the risks in this volatile market. “The upshot to oil and gas industry turmoil is that sophisticated investors now treat oil and gas companies as speculative investments,” Sanzillo and Kipple wrote for IEEFA.

The recent fall in oil prices will probably solidify the newfound “capital discipline” approach by many oil and gas companies. At this point, that’s what Wall Street wants, and most executives in the industry appear willing to keep spending in check, having been burned by repeated downturns in prices over the last few years. Related: Alaska Sees Record Breaking Year For Oil And Gas Leases

“Companies largely stated prioritization for returns and [free cash flow] instead of growth,” Goldman Sachs wrote in a note to clients after meeting with executives from several oil companies, including Occidental Petroleum, Apache Corp. and Range Resources.

“As its cash flow base grows, management indicated it would pursue dividend growth from its more secular cash flows and use cyclical excess [free cash flow] for repurchases or select opportunities for reinvestment,” Goldman said of Occidental’s plans. “Management indicated there would have to be a sustained change in oil prices in either direction to change capex plans.”

Investors are pleased that the industry is finally focusing on profits, and not simply growth. The flip side is that to some degree the industry is throwing up the white flag in terms of long-term growth. It’s not clear what that means five or ten years from now, but at this point, most oil and gas companies are focusing on near-term shareholder returns, not growing reserves for the next few decades. It’s a decidedly short-term strategy. But with peak oil demand and a climate crisis looming, that probably makes the most sense.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions

Leave a comment
  • snidely whiplash on November 20 2018 said:
    what it means is that 5-10 years down the road there will be energy (and food) shortages.
  • citymoments on November 20 2018 said:
    With all due respects to the author, I am very disappointed to read his closing statement " But with peak oil demand and a climate crisis looming, that probably makes the most sense."

    If this is the mindset behind his perspective regarding crude oil, then what is the point to talk about whether big oils companies are increasing their capital expenditures budget or not. If the demand for oil is declining and oil is condemned to cause climate crisis, then any company will be very foolish to allocate any significant amount of capitals to exploration and production for the long term. The best for them to do is to return as much cash as possible to their shareholders and wind down their operation soon.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News