Tesla and General Motors are seeing the beginning of the end for crucial U.S. federal tax incentives needed to transition interested car shoppers into electric vehicle owners.
The federal government years ago had placed a 200,000-vehicle cap, per automaker, on EV sales before tax incentives up to $7,500 would begin to be cut back. By the end of May, Tesla was estimated to be at about 194,000 EVs sold — including the Model S, Model X, Model 3, and Roadster — and GM was a little bit over 182,000, primarily through sales of the Chevrolet Bolt and Chevrolet Volt. Nissan was at about 120,000 through sales of the Leaf, and Ford finished May at nearly 108,000 EVs sold.
Once a manufacturer hits the 200,000 EV mark, they’ll finish that quarter and will go one more quarter beyond at the $7,500 incentive level. A phase-out period begins with incentives cut in half at $3,750 for the next six months; it then goes down to $1,875 for the next six months before it goes away entirely.
The tax credit started a decade ago under the George W. Bush administration and was expanded later under Barack Obama’s presidency. President Donald Trump has pulled away support for the tax incentives, and it was nearly terminated in the sweeping tax reform bill last year led by Congressional Republicans.
Automakers would like to see legislators direct the Internal Revenue Service to extend the tax credits. As is the case in several industrial nations, tax cuts and other incentives are seen as absolutely essential to grow EV sales — to make them worth the huge investments automakers have been slapping down in recent years. Related: Hefty Inventory Draw Boosts Oil Prices
Lithium-ion battery prices will continue to come down, EV range will be extended to over 300 miles per charge, fast charging will become common, and the EV product lineup will make them more enticing to car shoppers. But that will be years from now, and generous government incentives have been essential for sales to see a slow and steady increase.
The EV revolution is taking much longer to achieve than proponents such as Tesla CEO Elon Musk have been championing for years. In the past couple of years, European automakers have been announcing major strategic campaigns to bring battery electric and plug-in hybrid sales up to 25% of their total new vehicle sales sometime between 2025 and 2030.
In July 2017, Volvo announced that gasoline-only cars would stop being produced in 2019 with all new vehicles coming out with an all-electric or hybrid option. The company predicted it will have sold one million electrified vehicles by 2025.
When first created a decade ago, the federal tax credits were supposed to stir enthusiasm for the new technology and bridge the gap toward mass adoption. However, consumer adoption is not happening as quickly as expected at that time. States such as California have been able to enhance incentives with rebate programs, but incentive funding has been fading away in a few states.
Plug-in vehicles made up 1.2% of total new vehicle sales during 2017 according to automotive analyst IHS Markit. The research firm forecasts that will rise to 5% or more by 2022. That will rise to more than 10% by 2025, including hydrogen fuel cell vehicles.
IHS says that the number of plug-in vehicle models will go from 49 last year to 258 by 2025.
GM will take a larger hit than Tesla if the incentives dry up and go away, according to research by the Institute of Transportation Studies at the University of California-Davis. Wealthy car shoppers have been enthusiastic about buying a Tesla Model S or X, while lower-priced vehicles such as the Chevrolet Volt starting below a $40,000 sticker price have needed incentives to gain purchase support.
Italy’s new populist government believes enough in the technology to push for one million EVs to be on its roads by 2022. The goal is for Italy to go from Europe’s weakest EV market to knocking Norway off its mantle to become No. 1 in the continent.
It’s expected to cost country at least $10 billion in government incentives to reach that target.
China’s “new energy vehicle” program has been revived for the next few years. Consumers can find generous rebates and vehicle manufacturers have access to their own subsidies for building EVs in both the passenger and commercial vehicle segments. Related: China Is About To Disrupt Natural Gas Markets
The Chinese government wants to see its air quality improve and for its vehicle manufacturers — many times in joint venture partnerships with foreign manufacturers — to be global leaders in technology innovation and advancements.
EV incentives have seen several opponents who see it tainting the free market and supporting unwanted technology. There’s also the argument that government incentives have been subsidizing wealthy consumers to buy high-end EVs like the Tesla Model S and Model X.
Plug-in vehicle incentives have found support from major companies such as utilities. Power companies are investing in the charging infrastructure needed to build something similar to a vast network of retail gasoline stations.
GM CEO Mary Barra sees incentives as a requirement for EVs and charging to become typical and widely adopted.
"As we believe in an all-EV future, we think there's still work to do to make sure customers understand the benefit as we continue to develop the marketplace,” Barra said.
By Jon LeSage for Oilprice.com
More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:
- Oil Jumps As Trump Asks Allies To Cut Off Iranian Oil
- Oil Bulls Are Back On Outages
- Saudi Arabia, Kuwait Halt Oil Production In Neutral Zone
Yes, that is what happens when entities invest in research on a product -- it gets better and less expensive. All of these things will happen, because consumers are coming to realize that BEV is the better technology. Once public awareness of good BEVs sinks in, there will be a very rapid, market-driven, shift -- the only limiting factor will be the supply of good BEVs.
"But that will be years from now, and generous government incentives have been essential for sales to see a slow and steady increase."
No, the government incentives have largely been wasted; funneled into the general fund of the legacy automakers, instead of being used to fund further BEV research. Growth in BEV sales has had nothing to do with promotion by existing brands, but rather a dawning realization that BEVs do not have to be sad, incapable, weird-looking, golf-cart like compliance cars. Customer will, with some of the rent-seeking sting from legacy manufacturers eased by the government incentives, has been the driving force.
GM (and some others) still wants to sell overpriced econoboxs to granola-munching, dandelion-snorting, tree-hugging, green-weenie eco-warriors; those folks will pay anything for a bare-bones, belt-tightening exercise in vehicular masochism.
The rest of the public wants the smooth, quiet power delivery of an all electric drive. They want the rollover-resistance and sharp handling that comes from the low Center Of Gravity battery pack. They want the convenience of charging to full range overnight (every night!) at home, and never again making a dedicated trip to a specialty retailer who does little more than provide driving range and overpriced soft-drinks.
Do not renew the BEV tax credit; the carrot has failed to work. It is time for the stick. Any automaker that fails to offer compelling BEVs will rapidly lose market share to those who do. The bankruptcies of FCA and GM were on the 20% shrinkage of their revenue; even the more pessimistic projections have BEVs as 15% of the US new-vehicle market by the end of 2023 -- and existing BEVs tend to fall in the lucrative, high-margin 'premium' segment. Other markets -- China, Europe, Scandinavia -- will have far higher percentages.
My prediction? With or without incentives, by the end of 2028, ~90% of new car sales will be BEVs -- but it may happen faster. Don't invest in automakers, there are stormy times ahead; the petrochemical industry will shift to lubricants, coatings, pharmaceuticals, and polymers -- while fuel tapers off as a percentage of their output. Fuel prices will remain steady, rising to astronomical levels after 2030 as less and less of the existing fleet have to support the fixed costs of the fuel refining process.
LiIon cells will be below US $100 per kWh by the end of 2019; at that point any automaker that cannot produce a decent BEV isn't trying. Don't cut them any slack, especially not at the taxpayers expense.