4 daysJapan Nuclear Regulator Greenlights Radiactive Water Release From Fukushima
5 daysChina To Offload 2 Million Barrels of Iranian Crude Despite Sanctions
5 daysEx-German Chancellor Could Be Sanctioned Over Rosneft Ties
5 daysGasoline Prices Top $6 In California, $9 In Parts Of Europe
5 daysOil, Gas Employment Will Take Five Years To Recover From Covid: Rystad
5 daysInsurers Are Suffering Major Losses Due To Climate Change
5 days"Fossil Fuels Are A Dead End," UN Secretary-General Says
5 daysRussia Increasingly Using Own Oil Tankers To Boost Shipments To Asia
5 daysSaudi Oil Revenue To Surge 66% To $249 Billion On High Prices
5 daysRussia Could Halt Gas Supply To Finland On Friday
5 daysRussia's Gas Flows Via Ukraine Plunged 50% In The Past Week
6 daysAPI Reports Inventory Draws In Crude, Gasoline Despite SPR Release
6 daysLibyan Oil Deadlocked As Clashes Force PM-Designate Out of Tripoli
6 daysPutin: Europe Committing “Economic Suicide” With Energy Sanctions
6 daysUnited States To Release Venezuela From Some Oil Sanctions
6 daysU.S. Set To Suggest European Tariff On Russian Oil Instead Of Embargo
6 daysHungary Says Complying With Russia Oil Ban Would Cost It $811 Million
6 daysNew Trading Firms Replace Oil Majors In Business With Russia
6 daysIraqi Government Prevents Chinese Parties From Buying Into Oil Deals
6 daysSaudi Aramco Considers Listing $30 Billion Trading Arm As Oil Prices Soar
6 daysRussia Becomes One Of India’s Top 5 Oil Suppliers
4 minutes"Natural Gas Trading Picks Up Considerably Amid High Volatility" by Charles Kennedy - ...And is U.S. NatGas Futures dramatically overbought at the $6.35 range?
8 minutesHow Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
12 minutes What Russia has reached over three months diplomatic and military pressure on West ?
4 hoursGREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
1 dayWhat China is Learning from Russia's War in Ukraine and its Consequences
11 hoursNatural Gas is the Cleanest and most Likely Source of Energy to Fuel the World.
8 hoursAdvancing Fundamental Drilling Science - Geothermal drilling successes offer potential gain for petroleum industry
3 daysFailure To Implement Russian Oil Ban Could Send Oil Crashing To $65
5 daysRevisiting: "The U.S. Grid Isn’t Ready For A Major Shift To Renewables" from March 2021 by Irina Slav at OILPRICE
4 hours"Russia will stop 'in a moment' if Ukraine meets terms - Kremlin" by Reuters via Yahoo News...but Reuters suddenly cut out the balanced part of the story.
Let the second annexation begin … but it won’t go down like Crimea.
In a rehashing of the events that led to Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, Russian media are now reporting that officials in Kherson, in Ukraine’s south, are gearing up to petition the Kremlin for formal recognition as part of Russia.
Kherson is a key city along the “land bridge” Russia hopes to form from Crimea to the Donbass region as it attempts to occupy and eventually usurp a large chunk of Ukraine. In late April, the Russians gained the upper hand here, replacing Ukrainian officials with pro-Russian officials. They even changed the currency to the ruble. This is now a military administration, with pro-Russian Ukrainian civilians in the mix. This is Russia’s attempt to prove that Kherson (like Crimea) desires to be part of the Russian Federation. But it’s easy to hold a successful referendum when half of the population has fled or been forced into Russia. Russian media is also rife with comments from “collaborators” and pro-Russian figures stating that Moscow may simply annex Kherson without bothering with a sham referendum.
Source: Institute for the Study of War
Some analysts believe that seeing a referendum held in Kherson (or an outright annexation) would be enough of a victory for Putin to end Moscow’s “special operation”. We would caution against this view, not the…
Let the second annexation begin … but it won’t go down like Crimea.
In a rehashing of the events that led to Russia’s annexation of Crimea in 2014, Russian media are now reporting that officials in Kherson, in Ukraine’s south, are gearing up to petition the Kremlin for formal recognition as part of Russia.
Kherson is a key city along the “land bridge” Russia hopes to form from Crimea to the Donbass region as it attempts to occupy and eventually usurp a large chunk of Ukraine. In late April, the Russians gained the upper hand here, replacing Ukrainian officials with pro-Russian officials. They even changed the currency to the ruble. This is now a military administration, with pro-Russian Ukrainian civilians in the mix. This is Russia’s attempt to prove that Kherson (like Crimea) desires to be part of the Russian Federation. But it’s easy to hold a successful referendum when half of the population has fled or been forced into Russia. Russian media is also rife with comments from “collaborators” and pro-Russian figures stating that Moscow may simply annex Kherson without bothering with a sham referendum.
Source: Institute for the Study of War
Some analysts believe that seeing a referendum held in Kherson (or an outright annexation) would be enough of a victory for Putin to end Moscow’s “special operation”. We would caution against this view, not the least because Ukraine will not likely allow it to happen that easily. A referendum in Kherson, under Russian military control, would not be legitimate, nor would it complete the land bridge from Crimea to Donbas. It would remain a conflict, possibly not even “frozen”.
Mariupol, another important port city on the land bridge path for Russia, is now destroyed, yet the Russians do not have full control here. The Pentagon puts Russian troop numbers at about 2,000, with many of them having headed to the Donbas. The beginning (Kherson) and the end (Luhansk) must first be secured before the middle of the land bridge is fully conquered.
Russia is going to get its frozen conflict, but once (and if) Europe manages to embargo Russian oil and–more importantly–replace Russian gas and all the infrastructure that requires–Russia will have lost its hold over Europe and will still be stuck funding annexed territories that will be expensive to rebuild and maintain.
The war can have no definitive end–only a transition. And it’s a war that is largely playing out in the energy sector, with the West’s ultimate goal now to weaken Russia. It will not destroy Russia, and it’s unclear if it will even destroy Putin’s power base if it goes on for too long and if the military losses continue to mount with no visible victory (outside of propaganda). What it will do is shift the balance of power further towards China. A weakened Russia is also a potential open door for China. As we said, there is no real victory here. In a highly globalized world, there are no clear victories.
To access this exclusive content...
Select your membership level below
COMMUNITY MEMBERSHIP
(FREE)
Full access to the largest energy community on the web