• 5 minutes 'No - Deal Brexit' vs 'Operation Fear' Globalist Pushback ... Impact to World Economies and Oil
  • 8 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 12 minutes Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 2 hours Recession Jitters Are Rising. Is There Reason To Worry?
  • 31 mins Danish Royal Palace ‘Surprised’ By Trump Canceling Trip
  • 1 hour China has invested btw $30 - $40 Billon in Canadian Oil Sands. Trump should put 10% tariffs on all Chinese oil exported into or thru U.S. in which Chinese companies have invested .
  • 8 hours US Shale Economic Impact: GDP gain realized in shale boom’s first 10 years
  • 3 hours Used Thin Film Solar Panels at 15 Cents per Watt
  • 1 hour A legitimate Request: France Wants Progress In Ukraine Before Russia Returns To G7
  • 8 hours Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 3 hours IS ANOTHER MIDDLE EAST WAR REQUIRED TO BOLSTER THE OIL PRICE
  • 12 hours Tit For Tat: China Strikes Back In Trade Dispute With U.S. With New Tariffs
  • 11 hours Philadelphia Energy Solutions seeks to permanently shut oil refinery - sources
  • 8 hours Iran Is Winning Big In The Middle East
  • 7 hours Strait Of Hormuz As a Breakpoint: Germany Not Taking Part In U.S. Naval Mission
  • 6 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 7 hours Domino Effect: Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Offer For 'Humanitarian' Visit To West Bank
Alt Text

Buying The Dip In The Markets

Worries about the U.S., China…

Alt Text

The Toughest Challenge For Any Energy Company In 2019

Strong volatility and poor overall…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Premium Content

How Will OPEC React To Soaring Shale Production?

OPEC has finally acknowledged what everybody else had concluded some time ago: U.S. shale output is soaring.

In its March Oil Market Report, OPEC revised up its forecast of non-OPEC supply for 2018 by 280,000 bpd, a major revision. That equates to year-on-year growth of 1.66 million barrels per day (mb/d).

The group couched the change in boring technical jargon, noting that “the upward revision is mainly due to higher-than-expected output in 1Q18 by 360 tb/d in OECD (Americas and Europe), FSU and China.” But make no mistake, OPEC is conceding that U.S. shale is surging, which complicates the cartel’s calculations for rebalancing the oil market.

Crucially, the forecast now acknowledges that oil supply will outpace demand this year, a conclusion that the IEA had been predicting for a few months.

The trend is worrying for OPEC. The effects of the production cuts of 1.2 mb/d (plus nearly 0.6 mb/d from Russia and other minor partners) had little effect in early 2017, likely because of the ramp up in production and exports just prior to the implementation of the deal.

However, as 2017 wore on, the cuts started to really bite. Inventories plunged toward the end of last year, tightening the market and forcing up oil prices. Some analysts have even predicted that the oil market could already be rebalanced.

The IEA was an early spoilsport, however, predicting at the start of 2018 that despite the run up in prices, inventories would start climbing again in the first half of the year. In January, oil traders shrugged off this bearish assessment, driving Brent up to $70. From there, the rally stalled, and U.S. shale began to take off again, pushing prices back down. Related: Which Oil Major Has The Best Investment Strategy?

In subsequent weeks, the forecasts for U.S. shale growth have been ratcheted up leaps and bounds, and the expected strong gains in output from shale have transformed into expectations of a tidal wave of new supply that will push U.S. production over 11 mb/d by the end of this year. Most analysts have since followed in the IEA’s footsteps and offered their own takes on how fast U.S. shale would grow.

OPEC is just getting around to acknowledging this fact. OPEC now says that global oil demand will rise by 1.6 mb/d this year, which will be more than offset by a global supply increase of 1.66 mb/d. Ultimately, this means that a little less OPEC production will be needed. The group revised down the need for its production by 200,000 bpd for 2018.

This complicates things for OPEC, but for now, the group will stay the course. OPEC’s report pointed to the sharp decline in inventories since last year. “It should be noted that the overhang has been reduced by 289 mb from January 2017,” OPEC wrote. OECD crude inventories are only 74 million barrels above the five-year average while refined product stocks are actually in a 24-million-barrel deficit relative to the seasonal norm. This suggests that the OPEC cuts have had a huge impact.

Nevertheless, as expected, inventories have begun climbing again. OPEC noted the 13.7-million-barrel increase in stocks in January, the first increase in five months. If inventories continue to rise, even at a slow rate, the goal of bringing stocks back to the five-year average will remain elusive. All the while U.S. shale is surging, taking market share away from the cartel.

While there is speculation about what that might mean for the resolve of OPEC members in regards to the production limits, a more immediate response could come in the form of altering the overall metric used to define success. Reuters reports that Saudi oil minister Khalid al-Falih is looking at other measurements that could guide the OPEC cuts, such as non-OECD inventories, floating storage, and oil that is in transit. The problem with that is OECD inventories have always been the main metric precisely because that offers the best available data. Data on oil stocks in non-OECD countries is tricky and opaque.

Another metric looks more promising: days of forward cover. This measures the amount of oil in storage relative to how many days that supply could cover. Because demand has climbed substantially over the last few years, the world needs more oil in storage than it used to. Related: Post Tillerson: Is The Iran Nuclear Deal At Risk?

For instance, OECD commercial stocks held 60 days’ worth of global demand in January, which is actually 5.3 days below the same period a year ago. Crucially, it is 0.6 days of cover lower than the five-year average – in other words, the oil market is balanced according to this measurement.

It’s not clear how this will inform OPEC’s decision-making; U.S. shale is still surging, keeping a lid on oil prices, regardless of the metric OPEC wants to use. If OPEC were to declare victory and return to full production, oil prices would likely fall sharply. “OPEC and Russia would probably be better off signaling a gradual approach or a ‘tapering’ of sorts,” said analysts at Bank of America-Merrill Lynch.

Indeed, the recognition that U.S. shale is going to grow more than expected likely means that OPEC realizes it will need to keep the cuts in place longer than it had planned.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • david on March 15 2018 said:
    The US is still under 1000 rigs running, shale has massive decline curves after IP and demand is soaring, I believe OPEC is not too concerned with US Shale. But, hhis would change should the US reach the 2013 1600 rig mark, but at $60.00 per bbl, I don't see that anytime soon.
  • Joe on March 15 2018 said:
    Good article. The numbers came out for the Bakken in North Dakota. They were unable to grow production and actually went down even with 60 rigs drilling. Sometime next year the Permian will start to feel the pain of the decline rates from the previous 6 years of drilling. Let's see what happens.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play