• 3 minutes War for Taiwan?
  • 7 minutes How China Is Racing To Expand Its Global Energy Influence
  • 10 minutes Is it time to talk about Hydrogen?
  • 1 min U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 47 mins Locked Thread on the election
  • 9 hours “Consumers Will Pay For Carbon Pricing Costs” by Irina Slav
  • 2 days can Trump pardon himself?
  • 1 hour British PM Eyes Banning Gasoline and Diesel Car Sales
  • 12 hours Censorship in USA
  • 10 hours Michael Moore Cranking Up Planet of the Humans Again
  • 1 day WTI / ​​​​​​​Price Forecasting 
  • 2 days Renewables deprogramming
  • 1 day CREO Syndicate – Ultrawealthy & Oil-igarchs Multi-Trillion Investments on Climate & Green
  • 23 hours Conoco Pledges ‘Net-Zero’ Emissions in Break With U.S. Rivals
  • 15 hours San Francisco Imposes Natural Gas Ban

Breaking News:

Goldman Speculates On The Future Of OPEC

Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again

Cushing Oil Inventories Are Soaring Again

The most important U.S. oil…

Saudi Aramco’s Landmark IPO Is Costing The Kingdom Billions

Saudi Aramco’s Landmark IPO Is Costing The Kingdom Billions

Saudi Aramco’s landmark IPO promised…

Why Gold Could Be Heading To $5000

Why Gold Could Be Heading To $5000

Gold prices have soared this…

Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing for news outlets such as iNVEZZ and SeeNews. 

More Info

Premium Content

Activist Investors Demand More Climate Action From Oil Majors

In the span of just six months, Europe’s biggest oil and gas companies raced to commit to net-zero emission targets in response to increased investor and societal demands to start addressing the elephant in the room.

Investors welcomed the steps and the setting of specific targets for carbon emissions reductions through 2050e, but many of them continue to view Big Oil’s climate commitments as insufficient to help the world achieve its Paris Agreement goals.

The current crisis, the uncertainty in the oil industry, and the uncertainty surrounding peak oil demand--whether past or future--represent a strategic opportunity for Europe’s biggest oil firms to embrace additional climate goals and to convince investors that their plans for the next three decades are both feasible and profitable.

Because, as-is, despite Big Oil’s pledges, some investors remain skeptical about how exactly the world’s largest oil firms would become net-zero emission companies by 2050 or sooner.

Environmentalists are not only skeptical – they say Big Oil’s pledges are just greenwashing. Greenpeace, for example, is criticizing the plans by oil majors, saying that nothing short of a complete stop to oil drilling would convince them that Big Oil--which happens to be in the business of oil drilling--is earnestly trying to do something good.

Investor groups are less harsh, and many of them have praised Europe’s biggest oil firms for their plans to become carbon neutral businesses by 2050.   Related: Why COVID-19 Won't Crush Renewables

Spain’s Repsol was the first oil and gas company in the world to pledge in December 2019 net-zero emissions by 2050. In just five months, Repsol was followed by BPEniShell, and Total – all of whom committed to net-zero emissions by 2050.

Still, some investors find the claims of Europe’s oil majors that they would be aligned with the net-zero or 1.5°C scenario overstated.

According to a new analysis from Transition Pathway Initiative (TPI) – an investor initiative backed by over $19 trillion of global capital - Shell and Eni now have the most ambitious emissions-reduction plans among the six European oil majors—Shell, Eni, BP, Total, Repsol, and OMV.

Eni has the most comprehensive strategic response with setting an absolute target to reduce all emissions, including Scope 3, by 80 percent by 2050, and disclosing the expected contribution of carbon capture and storage (CCS), the investor initiative said. 

“However, despite these commitments, none of the companies are aligned yet with ‘net zero’ or 1.5° C pathways,” TPI said in its analysis.

BP responded to TPI’s analysis, saying that it focuses on carbon intensity, while “We do not believe that carbon intensity alone is a reliable single measure of progress towards the Paris goals.”

BP is set to update the market in September about how exactly it plans to achieve its net-zero ambition.

Diversification into renewables is a huge strategic opportunity for the UK oil major, BP’s chief executive Bernard Looney told the Financial Times this week.   Related: The Relentless Oil Price Rally

“For a company of our experience there is enormous opportunity in that. It is the right thing to do from a societal perspective, a staff perspective, and for our shareholders. We’ve got some work to do to prove that business case to [shareholders],” Looney told FT.

While BP will work to convince shareholders that increased investments into alternative energies will drive the returns investors expect, shareholders in the biggest U.S. oil firm are pushing for climate action from ExxonMobil, which hasn’t set any net-zero emission targets.  

Exxon shareholder Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) said this week it would vote against the re-election of the Exxon board chair at the Annual General Meeting on May 27.

“We remain concerned by the Exxon’s lack of strategic ambition around climate change,” said Meryam Omi, Head of Sustainability and Responsible Investment Strategy at LGIM.

“We are seeing many of Exxon’s peers step up, and reaffirm their sustainability ambitions even amid the current testing circumstances. The world, and Exxon’s investors, cannot afford the company to fall behind.”

After Europe’s supermajors announced long-term carbon emission targets, the ball is now in U.S. oil giants’ court to respond to increased investor demand for climate action.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • steve jakubiak on May 17 2020 said:
    This reminds me of the SJW buttkissing Euro political class that signed the Paris Accord....and condemned us for not following suit.....knowing full and well they would NEVER meet the goals set out in that agreement.
  • Lee James on May 17 2020 said:
    A cigarette company will be slow to admit that its product contains harmful nicotine.

    A petroleum company will be slow to admit that its product contains harmful greenhouse gasses, especially if petroleum is seen by citizens to be essential.

    Our challenge is to create alternatives to petroleum that make possible petroleum being less "essential." That's where we need to go.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News