• 4 minutes China 2019 - Orwell was 35 years out
  • 7 minutes Wonders of US Shale: US Shale Benefits: The U.S. leads global petroleum and natural gas production with record growth in 2018
  • 11 minutes Trump will capitulate on the trade war
  • 14 minutes Glory to Hong Kong
  • 2 hours 5 Tweets That Change The World?
  • 13 hours The power of propaganda has no boundaries: Which country has larger territory US od China
  • 6 hours Freedom of Speech for Dummies
  • 2 hours Boring! See Ya Clowns, And Have Fun In Germany
  • 2 hours Bloomberg: shale slowing. Third wave of shale coming.
  • 5 hours The Mysterious Iranian Tanker
  • 15 hours South Korea Unveils Fighter Jet Mock-Up Amid Program Challenges
  • 18 hours Iranian Oil Tanker struck by missiles off Jeddah
  • 13 hours How The US Quietly Lost The 1st Amendment
  • 17 hours National Geographic Warns Billions Face Shortages Of Food And Clean Water Over Next 30 Years
  • 8 hours Climate Protesters Blocking Roads etc...
  • 13 hours Crazy Stories From Round The World
Kurt Cobb

Kurt Cobb

Kurt Cobb is a freelance writer and communications consultant who writes frequently about energy and environment. His work has also appeared in The Christian Science…

More Info

Premium Content

Will Shale Rise From The Dead?

A flurry of coverage about the gloom and outright calamity in the shale oil business appeared last week. Low prices continue to dog the industry. But so does lack of investor interest in financing loss-making operations for yet another season. Plunging stock prices portend more bankruptcies if circumstances don't change.

I received considerable pushback last January when I asked whether U.S. shale oil had entered a death spiral. The almost constant refrain of the cheerleaders for the shale oil industry has been that increasing production demonstrates there is something wrong with my analysis and that of others who have been skeptical of the industry's claims.

We skeptics have certainly been wrong about how long the boom could go on. We could not fathom why investors kept funneling capital into businesses that were consistently consuming it with no hope of ever providing a long-term return.

I can remember when Alan Greenspan, the former U.S. Federal Reserve Bank chair, opined in December 1996 about "irrational exuberance" in the U.S. stock market. His speech turned out to be only an inflection point for the technology sector boom. The tech-heavy NASDAQ stock exchange rose 288 percent between the day Greenspan spoke and the index's peak in March 2000.

In the subsequent bust the bankruptcy courts were littered with companies that had never made dime.

So far this summer season we have heard two unthinkable utterances come from shale oil industry executives. The first linked above was that the industry has destroyed 80 percent of the capital entrusted to it since 2008. This came from a CEO no longer in the industry.

The second, however, came from one of the largest players in the Permian Basin, the hotbed of shale oil activity. Pioneer Natural Resources CEO Scott Sheffield said that the industry is running out of so-called Tier-1 acreage. That's oil-speak for "sweet spots." Those are the circumscribed areas in shale deposits within which extraction costs are low enough to justify drilling.

Outside the sweet spots there is oil, but it is much more costly to extract. The industry at one time likened shale oil production to a manufacturing operation, claiming the one could drill practically anywhere in a shale deposit and get oil out profitably. No one is making such claims credibly any more. Related: Germany’s Big Bet On Hydrogen

Now, just two years ago the same Scott Sheffield mentioned above compared the Permian Basin to Saudi Arabia. To be fair to Mr. Sheffield, his job is to attract investors so he can drill more wells. So, I fault mostly the investors for not looking carefully at the economics of shale oil which have been free cash flow negative for the industry as a whole for almost a decade.

Some have called shale oil a Ponzi scheme. In a Ponzi scheme the books of the Ponzi operator are kept hidden from the investors so as to make sure they don't catch on that money from new investors is being used to pay exorbitant returns to old ones. In the case of shale oil, the financials were published quarterly by the publicly traded companies for all to see. And, the wealth extracted by company managements could be calculated practically to the penny.

So, why didn't investors understand what they were looking at? One possible explanation comes from an oil company executive who explained to me way back in 2009 that oil and gas companies often promote themselves as so-called "asset plays" to investors. They drill a lot of very marginal prospects to get reserves on their books and then tout the growth in their reserves. But much of those reserves will never be exploited at a profit. They are essentially a mirage.

Resource investing is tricky and most investors, even sophisticated ones, can be fooled by the hype. It's very difficult to know whether something a company calls a reserve is actually a reserve—even more so since 2008 when the Securities and Exchange Commission allowed companies to use "proprietary methods" to determine reserves that are not subject to disclosure.

It's true that the amount of oil in any one formation can be huge. But that is of no practical consequence if you can't get the oil out at a profit and do that consistently. Related: The Revival Of A $53 Billion Megaproject

To illustrate, there is enough gold dissolved in the world's oceans to make all those who are reading this piece millionaires. But the gold remains far too costly to extract.

It seems now that investors are finally realizing that the promise of most of these "asset plays" is never going to be realized.  Even a cheerleading trade publication last week ran a piece entitled "Is the US Shale Boom Winding Down?"

We skeptics said shale oil would not work on the so-called "manufacturing model" asserted by industry. It turned out we skeptics were right. The industry actually focused on "sweet spots" that allowed lower-cost extraction.

We skeptics said that a large portion of the sweet spots would probably be exploited within a decade or so depending on the pace of drilling and the price oil. Now one of the industry's most prominent CEOs is lamenting in public about the paucity of sweet spots remaining.

We skeptics said that investors would at some point realize that shale oil was a long-term money loser. A former industry CEO did the math and calculated the damage as minus 80 percent for investors in the industry as a whole since 2008. Lately, investors seem to be reacting to facts rather than the hype.

Will shale oil rise again from the dead as it did after the 2014-2016 price decline? That will happen only if two things occur: 1) The oil price rises significantly and 2) investors have a serious bout of amnesia.

By Kurt Cobb via Resourceinsights.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on August 12 2019 said:
    I have said time and again that the die is cast for the US shale oil industry. In 5-10 years it will be no more. This is the price the industry is paying for continuing to be unprofitable year after year. If judged by the standard commercial criteria by which other successful companies are judged, it would have been declared bankrupt years ago. The US shale oil industry has been underpinned by hype and lies.

    The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) in cahoots with the International Energy Agency (IEA), Rystad Energy and BP Statistical Review of World Energy continue to this minute hyping about booming production of shale oil with the Permian claimed to continue to set new production records and how shale oil is flooding the global oil market when the highest export figure US oil exports reached was 2 million barrels a day (mbd) in 2018 according to the authoritative 2019 OPEC Annual Statistical Bulletin. Moreover, the IEA and Rystad Energy will continue with their self-delusion claiming that US oil output is projected to overtake the combined production of Saudi Arabia and Russia by 2025 at 25 mbd and that the United States is the world’s largest producer of crude oil ahead of Russia and Saudi Arabia.

    The US shale industry has been lying about its break-even price of shale oil and the profitability of shale oil production when it was in effect following the adage of “robbing Peter to pay Paul” and also misleading investors by claiming possession of oil reserves it can’t produce.

    That is why shale oil can’t rise from the dead.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Dr. Smith Louamposis on August 15 2019 said:
    Shale has been lying about break even? We skeptics knew this day would come?
    You become outspoken in a time when only two things bring oil prices down - recession fears and trade war. Nothing else.
    If Shale is a scam, then we will see the numbers each week crash which will show production loss and less oil in market. Hedge funds will race back to oil, put long positions, increase price to $88, and then shale will be profitable again.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play