• 2 minutes CV19: New York 21% infection rate + 40% Existing T-Cell immunity = 61% = Herd Immunity ?
  • 4 minutes Is The Three Gorges Dam on the Brink of Collapse?
  • 7 minutes Sources confirm Trump to sign two new Executive orders.
  • 8 hours Is the oil & gas industry on the way out?
  • 6 hours In a Nutshell...
  • 11 hours Better Days Are (Not) Coming: Fed Officials Suggest U.S. Recovery May Be Stalling
  • 3 days No More Love: Kanye West Breaks With Trump, Claims 2020 Run Is Not A Stunt
  • 1 hour COVID is real now
  • 6 hours Australian renewables zone attracts 27 GW of solar, wind, battery proposals
  • 2 days Where is Alberta, Canada headed?
  • 2 days Putin Paid Militants to Kill US Troops
  • 3 days A Real Reality Check on "Green Hydrogen"
  • 17 hours Why Oil could hit $100
  • 3 days During March, April, May the states with the highest infections/deaths were NY, NJ, Ma. . . . . Today (June) the three have the best numbers. How ? Herd immunity ?
  • 3 days The Coal Industry May Never Recover From The Pandemic
  • 4 days Why Wind is pitiful for most regions on earth
Who Will Get Full Control Of Libya’s Oil Riches?

Who Will Get Full Control Of Libya’s Oil Riches?

Libya’s conflict is wide-open again,…

Too Little Too Late: Canada Misses The LNG Boom

Canada may have missed its chance to become an important player on the global liquefied natural gas market unless it changes its regulatory regime to make building LNG plants easier.

This is the opinion of the former head of the International Energy Agency, Maria van den Hoeven, who spoke to Bloomberg. Competition in the LNG industry is intensifying quickly, Van den Hoeven said, noting the unique regulatory challenges that Canada puts in the way of new energy projects, which may deprive it of a place at the table of the big players in the LNG field.

Canada’s first liquefied natural gas project, aptly named LNG Canada, is currently in the early stages of construction after the consortium behind it made the final investment decision last October.

This is only the second LNG project in Canada after the ill-fated Pacific NorthWest project was cancelled by Malaysia’s Petronas in 2017. At the time, the company cited low gas prices for its decision to shelve Pacific NorthWest. At $27.1 billion, the price tag of the project was simply too big for the company.

Yet now, things are looking up. Petronas is a 25-percent partner in the LNG Canada consortium, which is led by Shell (40 percent), and PetroChina and Mitsubishi (15% each). South Korea’s Kogas is the smallest partner, with a 5-percent stake.

The LNG Canada plant will cost an estimated $31 billion and is expected to become operational before 2025. It will initially have two liquefaction trains, each with a capacity of 6.5 million tons of LNG with the prospect of adding another two trains at a later stage, bringing the total capacity of the facility in Kitimat, in northern British Columbia, to as much as 26 million tons annually.

Van den Hoeven admitted she was impressed with LNG Canada, but noted that Canada needs more than one export terminal given the growing demand for LNG on a global scale. And for that, Canada needs to make building these terminals easier.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News