• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 4 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 3 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 1 day Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 3 days China deletes leaked stats showing plunging birth rate for 2023
  • 4 days The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
Oil Prices Set for Third Weekly Loss in a Row

Oil Prices Set for Third Weekly Loss in a Row

OPEC+'s potential supply increases have…

Why OPEC+ Failed To Put $80 Floor Under Oil Prices

Why OPEC+ Failed To Put $80 Floor Under Oil Prices

The key disappointment for the…

James Stafford

James Stafford

James Stafford is the Editor of Oilprice.com

More Info

Premium Content

The End Of The Oil Major?

The End Of The Oil Major?

A new report finds that the largest oil companies are set to cut spending on exploration by at least half, potentially leading to very few new oil discoveries in the years ahead.

The report from investment bank Tudor, Pickering, Hold & Co., and reported by Fuel Fix, estimates that exploration budgets among the oil majors will drop to $25 billion in 2016, down from $50 billion from just a few years ago. Obviously, low oil prices are taking their toll, forcing deep spending cuts in a desperate attempt to shore up profitability. But the cuts have large implications for the energy sector, increasing the chances that some large oil fields remain undeveloped for years.

“Many (exploration and production) companies are virtually abandoning exploration altogether, especially in the U.S.,” the report concluded. Related: Cheap Gas Claims Another Nuclear Victim

Several once-promising frontiers for exploration have failed to attract the oil majors. Mexico’s two auctions this year for acreage in the Gulf of Mexico have largely disappointed. An auction held by the U.S. government earlier this year for Gulf of Mexico holdings in American waters also saw scant interest from the industry, the worst showing for the region in three decades. And last week, Brazil held an auction for some offshore blocks in the Atlantic Ocean, once a highly sought after region, and the results were an utter failure. Despite the fact that Royal Dutch Shell, Total, Statoil, ExxonMobil, and BP were all registered for Brazil’s auction, none submitted bids.

Shell also withdrew from the Arctic in late September, another area that the industry had believed would be a huge source of new supply. Shell decided to pull the plug for good, potentially killing off Arctic oil for decades.

Cuts to spending make sense in the short-run, but they also set up the oil industry for stagnant production in the years ahead. Once the backlog of projects currently under development begins to clear, there will be very few, if any, major sources of new supply to replace them. The Gulf of Mexico, the Arctic, and offshore Brazil – that is to say, deepwater projects – take years to develop. Not drilling now means oil won’t be coming online in 2020 or 2025. Related: Can The Oil Industry Really Handle This Much Debt?

Add to that the natural decline of existing oil fields, which will cut into supplies on an ongoing basis, depleting production by an average of around, say, 5 percent per year (with wildly different decline rates depending on where the oil is being extracted). Despite the seemingly unending glut in supplies, the markets could tighten pretty significantly in the years ahead.

There is an argument that says that shale resources, so abundant around the world, could provide enough new sources of supply for a very long time. As soon as oil prices rise, new shale projects will come online, responding much quicker than the conventional fields of the past.

But even if that is true – and the extent of shale potential over the long-term is up for debate – it is not necessarily good news for the oil majors themselves. The largest companies, such as ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, or BP, thrive in areas that are difficult for smaller companies, such as deep offshore. Shale production, on the other hand, can be done by hundreds of smaller drillers.

The oil majors have had mixed experiences with North American shale. Shell had to write-down some of its shale assets in the U.S., after spending $24 billion on a bet that failed to pay off, with company executives regretting ever having made the investment. ExxonMobil was late to the shale gas party, overpaying for XTO Energy when it bought the company for $41 billion in 2010. And the experiences in shale basins outside of North America (Poland, for example) have also disappointed.

In short, the prospects for the oil majors are uncertain. Megaprojects are no longer in fashion, with costs that are unjustifiable. Shale projects, with shorter time horizons and lower upfront costs, are not the exclusive purview of the oil major. Deep offshore, where these companies have traditionally excelled, appears to be too expensive at this point.

How the oil majors pivot going forward is unclear. Meanwhile, low oil prices are putting significant pressure on these companies, potentially threatening their coveted dividend policies. Slashing dividends, which could become unavoidable if oil prices remain low, will tarnish the oil majors’ reputation with Wall Street. There are few good options right now.


By James Stafford of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Bob on October 14 2015 said:
    Stafford is right on target again with another important and thorough article that envisions a major future drop in production, and of course, this will effect oil prices. OPEC, with a much shorter horizon, is also predicting major cuts in production will start bringing prices into balance in 2016, while Goldman Sachs is looking at the glut lasting much longer. The difference is that while GS is predicting the future, OPEC, with a 40% market share, is capable of making the future occur.
  • Lee James on October 15 2015 said:
    Nice to see reality setting in to the petroleum extraction business. We've had a lot of hype over miracle technology, without regard to cost. I think we can be more realistic about the cost of new production, and plan accordingly. That being said, there are a lot of ways the price of crude can shoot up from here. But we now see that costly unconventional extraction is no panacea -- even before charging more for environmental damage. Lastly, the risk of wildly see-sawing fuel prices is still very much with us.

    I like that Oil Price includes articles on alternatives to fossil fuel dependency.
  • DJM on October 16 2015 said:
    I have been in the O&G industry since 1980. Currently with a small mid-stream engineering firm. I am old enough that I clearly remember the 1973-74 Oil Embargo.
    I sincerely believe, regardless of the abundance of oil on the market today that we are heading straight into an OPEC trap with an outcome that will make the aforementioned event 45 years ago pale by comparison.

    We will have GASOLINE RATIONING in this country again and it will hit us like a thief in the night. In 1973 there were GASOLINE WAITING LINES and $3.00 PURCHASING LIMITS. I waited in line once for over an hour to buy my $3.00 worth of GAS and by the time I got to the pump it ran out at $2.87 ! ! ! Couldn't even get my pathetic limit.
    As crazy as this might sound, we need to enact immediately a FLOATING TARIFF ON ALL IMPORTED OIL that will bring up the price enough to keep THE DOMESTIC industry alive. To not do this will all but assure a major calamity.
  • Lee James on October 16 2015 said:
    Good to think strategically about oil supply, as a reader concerned about keeping our domestic production alive commented.

    The reality today is that incremental extraction is expensive, whether it is of the smaller-scale, as-needed production like fracking, or the longer-range mega-project. As for the potential for the U.S. getting caught short, I think conflict in oil-producing areas is in many ways the most important variable. Major supplies can be cut off in an instant.

    Not only do we have a lot of conflict in oil-producing areas of the world, some countries convert oil revenue into offensive weapons. Oil has a track record as a conflict multiplier. It is also the way one oil country in particular can become the alpha country of the world ... and I do not mean Saudi Arabia. To qualify as an Oil Major today, we are going need a more peaceful world. Best to transition away from oil dependency.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News