• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 5 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 10 days Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 6 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 9 days James Corbett Interviews Irina Slav of OILPRICE.COM - "Burn, Hollywood, Burn!" - The Corbett Report
  • 9 days The European Union is exceptional in its political divide. Examples are apparent in Hungary, Slovakia, Sweden, Netherlands, Belarus, Ireland, etc.
  • 11 days Biden's $2 trillion Plan for Insfrastructure and Jobs
  • 11 days e-truck insanity
  • 11 days "What’s In Store For Europe In 2023?" By the CIA (aka RFE/RL as a ruse to deceive readers)
Is $100 Oil Within Reach?

Is $100 Oil Within Reach?

We have a situation where…

Rising Middle East Risk Sparks Fear of $100 Oil

Rising Middle East Risk Sparks Fear of $100 Oil

In case of further escalation,…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is an independent journalist, covering oil and gas, energy and environmental policy, and international politics. He is based in Portland, Oregon. 

More Info

Premium Content

Could Oil Prices Plummet A Second Time?

Could Oil Prices Plummet A Second Time?

Are oil prices heading for a double dip?

The surge in shale production has produced a temporary glut in supplies causing oil prices to experience a massive bust. After tanking to a low of $44 per barrel in January, falling rig counts and enormous reductions in exploration budgets have fueled speculation that the market will correct sometime later this year.

However, there is a possibility that the recent rise to $51 for WTI and $60 for Brent may only be temporary. In fact, several trends are conspiring to force prices down for a second time.

Drillers are consciously deciding to delay the completion of their wells, holding off in hopes that oil prices will rebound, according to E&E’s EnergyWire. The decision to put well completions on hold could provide a critical boost to the ultimate profitability of many projects. Higher oil prices in the months ahead will provide companies with more money for each barrel sold. But also, with the bulk of a given shale well’s lifetime production coming within the first year or two, it becomes all the more important to bring a well online when oil prices are favorable. With prices still depressed – WTI is hovering just above $50 per barrel – drillers are waiting for sunnier days. Related: Here’s What Will Send Oil Prices Back Up Again

Yet another reason to wait is the possibility that costs for well completions will decline. Oil and gas companies often contract out well completions to third parties, and those companies will face pressure to cut their fees in order to keep business. That works in favor of producers who put their projects on hold for the time being. Well completions can make up as much as three-quarters of the total project cost.

Several prominent shale drillers have confirmed they are undertaking such a wait-and-see strategy. EOG Resources, one of the biggest Texas shale drillers, announced its plans in late February to hold off on completions. Chesapeake Energy and Continental Resources have now followed suit.

"We're intentionally holding production back in 2015, because we believe it's the prudent thing to do," Doug Lawler, Chesapeake's CEO, said in a conference call. Chesapeake has said it may delay completing as many as 100 wells. EOG has 200 wells awaiting completion, a backlog that will intentionally rise to about 350 this year.

As the industry clears out that queue of wells awaiting completion, a rush of new supplies could come online, pushing WTI prices down once again. Related: US Will Never Gain Oil Market Crown Says IEA Head

Even with well completions being suspended, supplies continue to build. The latest EIA data shows that oil stocks in the United States climbed to 434 million barrels, the highest levels in storage in over 80 years. “My gut feeling is that the oil price could see a double bottom,” Jason Kenney, an analyst with Banco Santaander SA said in a Bloomberg interview. “We’ve got too much inventory.” Bloomberg noted that Kenney has a good track record of predicting price swings in the past. Even though rig counts have declined significantly, output has so far proved resilient.

Finally, there is some evidence that the ability to move excess oil into storage may run into trouble if production does not decline. Storage tanks are starting to fill, raising the possibility that a glut could worsen. There is a great deal of uncertainty around how quickly this might happen. The EIA sought to clarify, noting that the markets have confused some of its storage figures – some oil supplies in the EIA’s weekly inventory data is actually sitting in pipelines and at well sites, meaning there is more storage capacity available than many news outlets had originally thought. An EIA analyst recently told Bloomberg that overall storage capacity is only at about 60 percent, and “[w]e still have a way to go before we can consider ourselves to be full,” Rob Merriam, EIA’s head of petroleum statistics said. It would take a few months of strong inventory builds to fill up the remaining storage, perhaps an unlikely scenario, especially if production starts to take a hit. But if storage tanks did start to fill up, prices would dive once again and companies would have to shut in wells and cut back on production.

Rig counts are at six year lows, forcing oil prices up on speculation that supply reductions will soon relieve the oil glut. But a double dip cannot be ruled out.


By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • jeff snyder on March 03 2015 said:
    The beef industry has just decided to stop sending beef to the market and will wait until prices are higher to resume feeding Americans.
    "As a cattle producer, we have plenty of food for our own tables so we'll just wait it out until prices are better for us."

    "As a restaurant owner, we have decided to stop serving meals in our establishment until we can charge more for a dinner. While this may reduce our costs by not having to buy those underpriced cows, it will surly pay off in the long run."

    "As a cab driver I have decided to wait until gas prices go up some more before I give out any more rides. This way I can raise fares to a more sustainable level. For the time being I'll keep my out of service light on."

    Sounds ridiculous doesn't it?
  • Chris on March 03 2015 said:
    Amazing, I haven't heard anyone talking about the fact that since '05 nearly all global production gains are due to US / Canadian tight oil production gains...and no other region (except Russia) increased production while the price of oil rose 5 fold (granted, I haven't read too much on this site). But, no other region was apparently incented by 5x's higher prices to bring oil to the market?!?! And US did it via a mass of low interest lending and tax loopholes to allow a huge # of rigs w/ relatively low output...4x more rigs in the US than all the middle east which produces 3x's as much oil?!?

    Glad to hear some discussion on this topic (all detailed in the link).

  • Mike on March 03 2015 said:

    While I don't necessarily support the article position, let me give you a slightly different example that it much less ridiculous.

    I'm a producer with 500 wells online and 100 wells in inventory to be completed. I was careful and with a few hedges and strong cost controls, I'm breaking even or maybe making a small profit with my 500 wells even at reduced prices.

    Looking at my 100 inventory wells, I know I may have to complete some to maintain production. But for the rest, I may choose to delay that expenditure betting on lower service prices (which seems prudent based on historical pricing trends during industry down turns).

    Additionally, I have the value of the assets themselves. If I complete now and produce, I am potentially not capturing the highest value for my asset. If I believe the general trend is going to be rising prices, I might have the fiscal responsibility to my organization not to sell the assets at a lower price without a compelling business reason to do so.

    So while your analogies hold for a company in a produce or go hungry state, for some operators, the decision is going to be about minimizing $/bbl lifting cost and maximizing the return on the assets sold. Not all organizations are going to be in desperation mode at this point.
  • Roy Barton on March 11 2015 said:
    It does sound ridiculous, Jeff. There are no 'industry decisions'. Individuals making decisions about whether to produce or not is how capitalist businesses, such as oil, cattle, restaurants handle market fluctuations. They can't run wide open with low prices, the economy is contracting. Cattle producers make the decision all the time to slaughter less due to prices.....what's your point?

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News