• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 3 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 20 mins The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 2 hours Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 8 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 1 hour Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 13 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 12 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 8 hours Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 1 hour WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 22 hours California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 12 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 21 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 14 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
Alt Text

Is Nigeria’s Oil Industry On The Road To Recovery?

Throughout the spring and summer…

Alt Text

The Real Leader In Global Energy Production

Last week President Trump was…

Alt Text

What Happens To Syrian Oil Post-Civil War?

After years of conflict in…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

The Single Largest Supply Risk In Oil Markets

Maduro

Venezuela could be the reason that “tips the market decisively into deficit,” the International Energy Agency said in a new report.

Venezuela lost another 60,000 barrels per day (bpd) in February, according to the Paris-based energy agency, and continues to present the largest supply risk to the global oil market. The IEA noted that even if Venezuela’s production levels hadn’t cratered over the past year, and it produced at the agreed upon level as part of the OPEC deal, the group would still be posting close to a 100 percent compliance level. As it stands, however, Venezuela’s plummeting output put the cartel’s compliance rate closer to 150 percent, the highest figure to date.

Aside from that, the IEA said that not much has materially changed over the past month, but expressed a more bullish outlook towards the market for 2018. Oil inventories happened to climb in January for the first time since July 2017, but only increased by 18 million barrels, or about half of the usual rate for that time of year. In fact, the oil surplus only stood at 50 million barrels, while refined product supplies are actually in a deficit.

The agency slightly revised up its forecast for oil demand for 2018 by 90,000 bpd to 1.5 million barrels per day (mb/d). Demand is particularly strong in China and India. Supply is still expected to grow by 1.3 mb/d in the U.S., a huge figure, but unchanged from previous forecasts. Non-OPEC supply is expected to grow by 1.8 mb/d.

The IEA says that “market re-balancing is clearly moving ahead with key indicators – supply and demand becoming more closely aligned, OECD stocks falling close to average levels, the forward price curve in backwardation at prices that increasingly appear to be sustainable – pointing in that direction.” Inventories are expected to see a “very small stock build” in the first quarter, but then decline for the rest of the year. Related: OPEC Deal In Jeopardy As Iran And Saudi Arabia Square Off

That is a decidedly more bullish take – in tone, if not in substance – compared to the agency’s report from a month ago, when it warned that history was repeating itself. In February, the IEA said that U.S. shale production was growing so quickly that it could lead to another period of lower prices, spoiling OPEC’s effort at re-balancing the market just as that elusive goal appeared “close to hand.”

But, assuming OPEC keeps production flat for the remainder of 2018, the threat of an “accelerated decline” from Venezuela could be the “final element that tips the market decisively into deficit,” the IEA said. That is an entirely plausible scenario.

One risk factor to this forecast is the possibility of a trade war sparked by U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs. A trade “slowdown would have strong consequences, particularly for fuel used in the maritime sector and in the trucking industry,” the IEA warned.

In the medium-term, things look even tighter. New oil discoveries in 2017 hit a record low at only 4 billion barrels, which stands in stark contrast to the 36 billion barrels that were produced. The shockingly low level of new discoveries is the direct result of a dramatic fall in spending on exploration. The problem is that even with oil prices up substantially from a year ago, the IEA only expects investment to increase by 6 percent this year, after remaining flat in 2017.

Surging shale production will paper over this problem for the next two years or so. But after that, as the historic shale expansion slows to more pedestrian levels, “the market might well need the supplies currently being held off the market by leading producers,” the IEA said. Related: Is Another Oil Price War Looming?

For OPEC, that might be a long time to wait, and it is unclear if the group can hold onto its production limits until 2020. Nevertheless, beyond 2020, the IEA warns that the makings of a supply crunch are already materializing as there is a dearth of new production from large-scale conventional oil projects in the pipeline.

For now though, we are in a steady wait-and-see mode. The first half of the year is always a seasonally weaker time for the oil market. But the market could tighten later in the year – demand picks up in the summer, Venezuela could post stronger declines as the year wears on, and inventories are expected to tighten. U.S. shale is still expected to post “explosive” growth in 2018, but shale drillers might not swamp the market as some have feared.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh G Salameh on March 15 2018 said:
    This is a sudden change of tune by the IEA whose projections lacked credibility and whose hyping about US shale attracted criticisms from many experts and decision-makers from around the world.

    Let us hope that the IEA will finally understand that the oil price surge since December 2017 was not due to production loss in Venezuela but to a robust global demand for oil, accelerating growth of the global economy and the virtually re-balancing of the global oil market.

    The IEA has also to understand that US shale oil production failed in 2017 to cap the oil price at $60 and it will fail again in 2018 to cap it at $70.

    The oil prices are projected to range from $70-$75 a barrel in 2018 irrespective of exaggerated announcements by the EIA and the IEA about increases in US oil output or a build in US oil inventories.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • John Brown on March 20 2018 said:
    I love this article. With everything pointing to growing supply, and more of a glut, and even more supply in the near future, you can always count on some news being pushed out there that everyone can jump on to push prices higher rather than lower, regardless of how much oil is sloshing around the world. Venezuela's issues are hardly a surprise here, and I'd bet that U.S. production will exceed expectation, but heck almost everybody benefits from WTI at $65 or higher, so why not?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News