X

Sign Up To Our Free Newsletter

Join Now

Thanks for subscribing to our free newsletter!

ERROR

  • 3 minutes Texas forced to have rolling brown outs. Not from downed power line , but because the wind energy turbines are frozen.
  • 7 minutes Scientists Warn That Filling The Sahara With Solar Panels Is A Bad Idea
  • 11 minutes United States LNG Exports Reach Third Place
  • 15 minutes Joe Biden's Presidency
  • 1 hour U.S. Presidential Elections Status - Electoral Votes
  • 2 hours Texas Supply Chain Massacre
  • 45 mins America Makes Plans to Produce Needed Rare Earth Minerals Domestically
  • 9 mins Texas forced to have rolling black outs, primarily because of large declines in output from fossil fuel power plants
  • 4 hours Former BP Exec "Biden not in war against oil" . . Really ?
  • 2 days Good Marriage And Bad Divorce: Germany's Merkel Wants Britain and EU To Divorce On Good Terms
  • 1 day Speaker Pelosi, "Tear Down This Wall" . . around Capital Building
  • 4 days Retired RAF pilot wins legal challenge over a wind farm
3 Ways To Play The Next Commodity Supercycle

3 Ways To Play The Next Commodity Supercycle

After a lackluster decade for…

Wall Streets Sees 2,000% Growth For Booming EV Market

Wall Streets Sees 2,000% Growth For Booming EV Market

While ESG investments are gaining…

Josh Owens

Josh Owens

Josh Owens is the Content Director at Oilprice.com. An International Relations and Politics graduate from the University of Edinburgh, Josh specialized in Middle East and…

More Info

Premium Content

The IMO Will Ban Heavy Fuel Oil Use In The Arctic

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) approved on Friday a ban on the use of heavy fuel oil for ships in the Arctic, but environmental organizations slammed the new regulation as “riddled with loopholes” that would continue to exonerate some polluters well into the end of 2020s. The Marine Environment Protection Committee (MEPC) of the UN’s organization IMO moved to ban the use of heavy fuel oil (HFO) and its carriage for use by ships in Arctic waters after July 1, 2024. 

The controversy in the new regulation arises from several provisions. One exempts ships with oil fuel tanks inside their double hull, while another gives countries in Arctic waters the right to issue waivers from the HFO ban for vessels flying their respective flags in the Arctic until July 1, 2029.

The Clean Arctic Alliance slammed on Friday the approval of “a ban ridden with loopholes on the use and carriage of heavy fuel oil in the Arctic (HFO), saying that it would leave the Arctic, its Indigenous communities and its wildlife facing the risk of a HFO spill for another decade.” 

Related: Oil Majors Aren’t Worried About A Biden Presidency

“By taking the decision to storm ahead with the approval of this outrageous ban, the IMO and its member states must take collective responsibility for failing to put in place true protection of the Arctic, Indigenous communities and wildlife from the threat of heavy fuel oil”, Dr Sian Prior, Lead Advisor to the Clean Arctic Alliance, said in a statement. 

“It is now crucial that Arctic coastal states do not resort to issuing waivers to their flagged vessels,” Prior added. 

According to a 2020 white paper from the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), HFO use in the Arctic jumped by 75 percent between 2015 and 2019. 

“As newer ships enter the Arctic fleet, especially oil tankers and bulk carriers, more ships will qualify for exemptions. Additionally, if ships reflag to Arctic states, more could qualify for waivers and the effectiveness of the ban would be further eroded,” ICCT said in its paper in September.

By Josh Owens for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Ronald McKinney on November 22 2020 said:
    This needs to be done more quickly than 2024.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News