• 3 minutes Boris Johnson taken decision about 5G Huawei ban by delay (fait accompli method)
  • 6 minutes This Battery Uses Up CO2 to Create Energy
  • 10 minutes Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 12 minutes Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 3 hours Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 2 hours We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 4 hours Environmentalists demand oil and gas companies *IN THE USA AND CANADA* reduce emissions to address climate change
  • 20 hours Angela Merkel take notice. Russia cut off Belarus oil supply because they would not do as Russia demanded
  • 2 hours Might be Time for NG Producers to Find New Career
  • 1 day China's Economy and Subsequent Energy Demand To Decelerate Sharply Through 2024
  • 22 hours Swedes Think Climate Policy Worst Waste of Taxpayers' Money in 2019
  • 1 day Wind Turbine Blades Not Recyclable
  • 1 day Prototype Haliade X 12MW turbine starts operating in Rotterdam
  • 3 hours US Shale: Technology
  • 5 hours Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 1 day Denmark gets 47% of its electricity from wind in 2019

The Endgame In European Natural Gas

natural gas

The construction of Nord Stream 2 is nearing its logical conclusion – a grand standoff, in the first move of which the Council of the European Union adopted the amended EU Gas Directive. Brussels never really hid the fact that its only detectable target was to get pipelines which are constructed, owned and filled by Gazprom under its control. Thus came about the “gas triad” which will regulate Russian gas supplies to Europe from now on – the unbundling of transportation from supply, full predictability and transparency of pipeline tariffs and provision of third-party access. As of today, the contours of the future modus operandi are getting increasingly discernible, so we will try to disentangle some of the most complicated (and often incorrectly defined) issues surrounding Nord Stream 2.

The hurry with which the EU Gas Directive adjustments were made brings some light to the emotional background of Brussels technocrats: fast-tracking the approval process (so that instead of June it was April 15 that the CEU passed them), cutting back the transposition period from 12 months to 9 months (leaving the EC discontent as it was pushing for a largely unprecedented 3-month period). The European Commission simply needed to have it done before Gazprom can claim any further successes with the construction of Nord Stream 2. Apart from EC members directly alleging to keep the aim in view, Brussels’ only pipeline that is currently under construction and…




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News