• 2 minutes Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 5 minutes Middle East on brink: Oil tankers attacked off Oman
  • 8 minutes CNN:America's oil boom will break more records this year. OPEC is stuck in retreat
  • 4 mins Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Destroy their Economy Completely. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 1 hour The Pope: "Climate change ... doomsday predictions can no longer be met with irony or disdain."
  • 3 hours Emissions Need To Be Halved To Avoid 3C Warming
  • 2 hours Here We Go: New York Lawmakers Pass Aggressive Law To Fight Climate Change
  • 4 hours Coal Boom in Asia is Real and a Long Trend
  • 9 hours Summit in Pyongyang: China's Xi Says World Hopes North Korea-U.S. Talks Can Succeed
  • 19 hours Solar Panels at 26 cents per watt
  • 10 hours Pioneer CEO Said U.S. Oil Production would be up to 15 mm bbls/day NOW if we had the pipelines. Permian pipelines STARTING Q3
  • 5 hours Huge UK Gas Discovery
  • 1 day The Magic and Wonders of US Shale Supply: Keeping energy price shock minimised: US oil supply keeping lid on prices despite global risks: IEA chief
  • 1 day Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 1 day US to become net oil exporter in November: EIA
  • 22 hours US Shale Drilling lacks regulatory body.
  • 23 hours Ireland To Ban New Petrol And Diesel Vehicles From 2030
Alt Text

Canada Can’t Get Its Pipeline Problem Under Control

Canada’s once-booming oil industry has…

Alt Text

The Top 50 Oil & Gas Companies Of 2019

The playing field for global…

Leonard Hyman & William Tilles

Leonard Hyman & William Tilles

Leonard S. Hyman is an economist and financial analyst specializing in the energy sector. He headed utility equity research at a major brokerage house and…

More Info

Trending Discussions

Poll Shows Americans Support Global Warming Action

The most recent opinion poll on climate change attitudes shows that the public may be more aware of climate issues than many think. Support for international treaties to limit greenhouse gas emissions approaches 80%. While 60% of respondents believe the government should be doing more regarding global warming. Only 10% of those surveyed believed the government was doing much to stem the adverse influence of global warming.

This poll represents a collaborative effort of ABC News, Stanford University’s Political Psychology Research Group, and the environmental think tank, Resources for the Future. This study extends twenty years of opinion data regarding attitudes on global warming.

To us this polling data revealed three concerns. First acknowledgement of a general global warming trend and its potential adverse consequences. Second, profound concern that these efforts, no matter how well intentioned, would raise prices on gasoline and electricity. Third, public confidence in government efforts to check the advance of global warming was also quite low at 20%.

For political leaders this is an interesting dilemma. Global warming is an issue acknowledged by the majority of the citizenry that no one wants to pay for via direct taxes or conservation. In addition, public confidence in potential governmental climate remedies is quite low. Only 19% of respondents were “very confident” that government efforts would actually reduce global warming. This lack of confidence also contributes to an absence of urgency.

Public support was high, 68% in favor, of taxing corporations based on their level of greenhouse gas emissions. Support was even greater for taxes on all imported fuels. Tax breaks for renewables are also very popular.

Perhaps most interesting was a bipartisan agreement critical of the oil industry. The majority believing the industry had aggressively covered up its connection to global warming trends.

Related: One Last Warning For The U.S. Shale Patch

In the electric utility area, respondents by a slight majority (51%) expressed a preference for power plants reducing emissions of GHGs and public support for renewables in general remains high.

Political partisanship plays a large role in beliefs about climate change. Democrats are more than twice as likely as Republicans to believe that the government should do something and that global warming is a “very serious” problem. Young people take the issue more seriously than older people, as do non-whites vs whites and non-religious vs white evangelical Protestants.

This survey has collected data since 1997. Popular belief in the existence of global warming has barely changed over that entire period. Three quarters of those surveyed have consistently believed in the phenomenon this entire period.

Politicians have been behind their constituents on this issue. But subsidies for cleanup of manufacturing processes, coal plant scrubbers and for renewables are the easiest measures to support. Smokestack industries would get a temporary reprieve.

In sum, the vast majority of Americans agree global warming is an issue and a problem. But a majority also expressed low confidence in proposed government solutions. And this lack of confidence in potential government climate solutions may help explain some of the absence of urgency in climate related issues.

By Leonard Hyman and William Tilles for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Suqi Madiqi on March 24 2019 said:
    What about greenies opposition to the only solution today, nuclear. What about greenies push for catastrophic carbon cuts which would lead to millions of deaths and billions more suffering all on a computer model. If the computer model worked so well, why don't they use it to pick stocks then buy all the fossil fuels.
  • Lee James on March 25 2019 said:
    By-pass government Command and Control of greenhouse pollution: price carbon in our marketplace without taxing. Make carbon pricing revenue neutral. Pay for pollution in the energy marketplace, but return revenue to citizens, or off-set other, existing taxes. This can be bipartisan. Anyone recall that way of doing things?
  • Leonard Hyman on April 03 2019 said:
    Recent polls have reinforced the results of the RFF poll we discussed. They show, too, that Democrats have been convinced of climate change for a long time, that Independents have switched to belief in climate change threat, while older Republicans remain deniers but younger Republicans are getting disturbed by the party's climate policies. Clearly public opinion is shifting and the question is why politicians are so far behind. Was it German physicist Max Planck who said that science advances one funeral at a time?

    As for attacks on nuclear, we have written extensively on nuclear, with our major point being that new nuclear power stations of the kind being built have turned into one of the slowest, least efficient and most expensive ways to produce no-carbon energy, at least in the industrial nations of the west, as evidenced by projects in South Carolina, Georgia, England, France and Finland. You don't have to be a greenie to figure that out. Maybe a new type if nuke would change that picture.

    As for a bipartisan approach to climate change that employs markets to achieve goals, that would be a wonderful start. Let's hope that we can convince the political classes and the public that prices can work to achieve carbon reduction goals more easily that what it took to convince NY pols of the virtues of congestion pricing in Manhattan.

Leave a comment





Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News