• 4 minutes Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 7 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 11 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 15 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 8 hours Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 11 hours Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 15 mins Visualizing How Much Oil Is In An Electric Vehicle (Hint: a heckuva lot)
  • 1 hour Look at the LONGER TERM bigger picture of international oil & gas. Ignore temporary hiccups.
  • 4 mins Theresa May to Step Down
  • 11 hours Total nonsense in climate debate
  • 12 hours IRAN makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . U.S. makes threats, rattles sabre . . . . IRAQ steps up and plays the mediator. THIS ALLOWS BOTH SIDES TO "SAVE FACE". Then serious negotiations start.
  • 14 hours Will Canada drop Liberals, vote in Conservatives?
  • 1 day IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 15 hours Trump needs to educate US companies and citizens on Chinese Communist Party and People's Liberation Army. This is real ECONOMIC WARFARE. To understand Chinese warfare read General Sun Tzu's "Art of War" . . . written 500 B.C.
  • 15 hours Canada's Uncivil Oil War : 78% of Voters Cite *Energy* as the Top Issue
  • 7 hours Australian Voters Reject 'Climate Change' Politicians
  • 11 hours Apple Boycott in China

Goodrich Petroleum Part 2

In general, I try not to return to ideas that I have written about before. It strikes me as a bit lazy; I mean I have already done the research that prompted the initial call and you, dear reader, are probably looking for new ideas, not old ones. Sometimes, though, a situation changes, or appears to, and a previously talked about stock becomes an opportunity all over again.

Such is the case with Goodrich Petroleum (GDP). I first talked about Goodrich in a piece you received in the April 4th edition of Oil & Energy Insider. At that time I identified the stock as one of the best plays on the continuing shale oil boom. GDP closed that day at $17.11 and then went on a tear, peaking at $29.60 in June.
 

If you took my advice then, I am sure you were quite pleased with a 67 percent profit in 2 months, but if you did and are still holding on I am equally sure that recent news and subsequent price action has you worried…don’t be. In fact, now may be a good time to add to that position and for those that missed the chance to get in on the action.

The news that caused the recent drop was Goodrich’s announcements that their last two completed wells, Nunnery 12-1H-1 and Beech Grove showed “disappointing” first day production of 815 and 740 Barrels of Oil Equivalent per day (BOE/d). For comparison, the two wells completed before that, Blades 33 H-1 and Lewis 30-19H-1 yielded around 1200 and 1450 BOE/d. I understand that these lower initial yields caused the stock to drop, but a 30 percent fall looks to be a serious overreaction.

The basic case for investing in the Tuscaloosa Marine Shale (TMS) play that GDP is involved in and for buying that stock in particular is still in place. The TMS has, until recently, been a problematic field. Drilling problems have led to delays in production and even some failures, but recent technological advances and simply learning from past problems have made recent wells less problematic. This process is continuing and days to completion and therefore the cost of de-risking known reserves continues to fall. Goodrich wells currently cost around $13 million to complete and the company has a goal of reducing that to $10 million. Five consecutive wells drilled without major problems suggest that that goal is achievable. Obviously, at that point, margins would increase significantly and that is the key to GDP’s future profitability.

At the time of the initial…




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News