• 2 minutes Rational analysis of CV19 from Harvard Medical School
  • 4 minutes While U.S. Pipelines Are Under Siege, China Streamlines Its Oil and Gas Network
  • 7 minutes Renewables Overtake Coal, But Lag Far Behind Oil And Natural Gas
  • 8 hours Joe Biden the "Archie Bunker" of the left selects Kamala Harris for VP . . . . . . Does she help the campaign ?
  • 1 hour Tesla Begins Construction Of World’s Largest Energy Storage Facility
  • 16 hours Trump Hands Putin Major Geopolitical Victory
  • 44 mins America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 10 hours Those Nasty White People and Camping Racism
  • 5 hours Will any journalist have the balls to ask Kamala if she supports Wall Street "Carried Interest" Tax Loophole
  • 3 hours In 1,267 days, Trump has made 20,055 false or misleading claims
  • 5 hours COVID&life and Vicious Circle: "Working From Home Is Not Panacea For Virus"
  • 1 min Buying votes is cool now.
  • 13 mins Candidate Biden refuses to answer questions and hides from public. If u could, what questions would you ask him
  • 11 hours The Truth about Chinese and Indian Engineering
  • 20 hours Brent above $45. Holding breath for $50??
  • 2 days China wields coronavirus to nationalize American-owned carmaker
  • 1 day Oil Tanker Runs Aground in Mauritius - Oil Spill
  • 2 days Open letter from Politico about US-russian relations
Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Goldman: China Coronavirus Could Push Oil Down By $3

The outbreak of a coronavirus in China that is now an international threat could cut oil demand by 260,000 bpd, which would translate into a price drop of almost $3 per barrel, Goldman Sachs has said.

Most of the demand loss will come from jet fuel as the risk of disease discourages travelers from getting on a plane, according to the investment bank, whose analysts qualified the outbreak’s effect on oil prices as modest, Bloomberg reports.

Coronaviruses are common among animals but some of them can jump species, which is what happened with the SARS virus, to which the new one is related. Once it does jump species, the virus can be passed from human to human. Since the outbreak, hundreds have been infected and health authorities around the world are on red alert for more outbreaks.

The effect of the disease on oil prices is likely to be limited regionally, if the SARS epidemic is any indication. At the time, Bloomberg recalls, Asian airlines registered an 8-percent decline in annual traffic, according to data from the International Air Transport Association, but carriers elsewhere were much less affected.

So, while the actual effect on demand for jet fuel and, related to it, crude oil, would be limited, it is the uncertainty about demand prospects that may drive prices down.

“While an OPEC supply response could limit the fundamental impact from such a demand shock, the initial uncertainty on the potential scope of the epidemic could lead to a larger price sell-off than fundamentals suggest,” Goldman’s Damian Courvalin and Callum Bruce wrote in a note.

Oil prices were already trending lower when Bloomberg reported the news, pressured by an Energy Information Administration forecast that U.S. shale production is set for another monthly increase next month, to reach a total 9.2 million barrels daily.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Mamdouh Salameh on January 22 2020 said:
    Goldman Sachs is moving to the realm of fantasy by suggesting that a loss of oil demand by 260,000 barrels a day (b/d) resulting from the coronavirus in China could cut oil prices by $3 a barrel.

    Let us make a simple calculation. If the world is currently consuming 100.1 million barrels a day (mbd) at an oil price of $64 a barrel, reducing the global demand by 260,000 b/d would reduce the oil price at most by $0.17 (17 cents) to $63.83.

    If the loss of 5.7 mbd from Saudi oil production hardly caused oil prices to drop, how could a loss of 260,000 b/d translate into a price drop of $3?

    Doesn’t Goldman Sacks and the authoress of this article have something better to do or write about than coming up with such stupid ideas?

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Mamdouh Salameh on January 22 2020 said:
    (These are my amended comments)

    Goldman Sachs are moving to the realm of fantasy by suggesting that a loss of oil demand by 260,000 barrels a day (b/d) resulting from the coronavirus in China could cut oil prices by $3 a barrel.

    Let us make a simple calculation. If the world is currently consuming 11.1 million barrels a day (mbd) at an oil price of $64 a barrel. Reducing the global demand by 260,000 b/d would reduce the oil price by $0.17 (17 cents) to $63.83.

    If the loss of 5.7 mbd from Saudi oil production hardly caused oil prices to rise, how could a loss of 260,000 b/d translate into a price drop of $3?

    Doesn’t Goldman Sacks and the authoress of this article have something better to do or write about than coming up with such stupid ideas?

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News