• 6 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 7 mins WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 5 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 1 min The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 9 hours OPEC's No. 2 Producer Wants to Know How Buyers Use Its Oil
  • 3 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 11 hours Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 5 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 5 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 4 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 2 hours COLORADO FOCUS: Stocks to Watch Prior to Midterms
  • 12 hours U.S. - Saudi Arabia: President Trump Says Saudi Arabia's King Wouldn't Survive "Two Weeks" Without U.S. Backing
  • 12 hours Superhumans
  • 1 hour Nopec Sherman act legislation
Alt Text

Oil Markets Take A Bearish Turn

Oil markets appear to have…

Alt Text

Are Energy Majors Under Threat From Big Tech?

Audi and Amazon have teamed…

Editorial Dept

Editorial Dept

More Info

Trending Discussions

Global Energy Advisory – 25th April 2014

Alaska Endorses Gas Pipeline Plans

Last weekend, the Alaska Legislature approved gas pipeline plans to spend some US$100 million in the short-term to join four energy companies to build infrastructure to transport North Slope gas along an 800-mile pipeline to an LNG export plant. Both the House and the Senate have approved the plan, which has now been sent back to Governor Sean Parnell to sign off on. This is Parnell’s plan to begin with, so signing off is a foregone conclusion. Under the deal the State of Alaska will collect future taxes from the pipeline in the form of a share of the natural cash, rather than cash. Effectively, this means the state will be partnering with pipeline giant TransCanada and oil and gas companies (Exxon Mobil, BP, Conoco Phillips).

Opponents of the deal argue that Alaska will make unacceptably low revenues on this project, while proponents say it’s a fair deal and the only way to start getting the gas out of the ground and to the market. Proponents are talking about the potential for around US$4 billion in revenues annually. However, this assumes that project costs aren’t high and gas prices aren’t low, and opponents point out that actual state revenues could end up being 10% of this.

The project’s goal is to market 35 trillion cubic feet of North Slope gas through the 800-mile pipeline connecting to an LNG export facility. The project will cost an estimated $45 billion to $65 billion for the pipeline…

To read the full article

Please sign up and become a premium OilPrice.com member to gain access to read the full article.

RegisterLogin

Trending Discussions





Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News