• 6 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 3 hours WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 8 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 2 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 12 hours OPEC's No. 2 Producer Wants to Know How Buyers Use Its Oil
  • 55 mins Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 6 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 14 hours Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 8 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 2 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 5 hours COLORADO FOCUS: Stocks to Watch Prior to Midterms
  • 7 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 15 hours Superhumans
  • 4 hours Nopec Sherman act legislation
Alt Text

Oil Price Rally Boosts Electric Car Sales

While $100 oil is believed…

Alt Text

Why Crypto Miners Are Paying Attention To The Permian

The Permian is literally burning…

Alt Text

US Demands For More Oil Could Backfire

The State Department’s request for…

Editorial Dept

Editorial Dept

More Info

Trending Discussions

Global Energy Advisory 13th October 2017

Offshore

October 13 is D-Day for the major European companies that have forged new geo-economic territory by cutting deals with Iran. On the 13th October, Trump will decide whether he’s going to certify Iran’s compliance with the nuclear deal. If he doesn’t, we’re looking at two months before Congress slaps new sanctions on Iran. For European giants (including French oil giant Total SA), this is a nightmare that threatens multiple billions of dollars in deals. Right now, Europe has no real plan to work around this.

And trouble is brewing in Alberta’s oil industry, as well…

TransCanada has decided to scrap its $12.6-billion Energy East pipeline project after years of controversy and opposition. The pipeline was planned to carry 1.1 million barrels of crude from Alberta and Saskatchewan to refineries on the east coast of Canada. The company cited “changed circumstances” likely to do with growing opposition to new pipeline projects, despite the federal government’s support for the project. TransCanada will take a $1-billion charge for pipeline planning and its federal review process.

The news puts Alberta in a precarious position as crude oil production is growing and it needs to be transported somehow from the fields. For Canada’s oil-rich province the only option now is the expansion of the Trans Mountain pipeline of Kinder Morgan, which, however, is being threatened by the new government of British Columbia,…

To read the full article

Please sign up and become a premium OilPrice.com member to gain access to read the full article.

RegisterLogin

Trending Discussions





Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News