• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 4 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 3 days By Kellen McGovern Jones - "BlackRock Behind New TX-LA Offshore Wind Farm"
  • 10 days Natron Energy Achieves First-Ever Commercial-Scale Production of Sodium-Ion Batteries in the U.S.
  • 10 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 9 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 12 days RUSSIA - Turkey & India Stop Buying Russian Oil as USA Increases Crackdown on Sanctions
Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana Paraskova

Tsvetana is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing for news outlets such as iNVEZZ and SeeNews. 

More Info

Premium Content

Exxon Is Big Oil’s Outlier In The Post-Pandemic World


While oil majors stuck to spending discipline after the 2015-2016 price crash, ExxonMobil was the one to stand out from the crowd as it increased capital expenditures to boost production.  

This year, in the second price collapse in four years, Exxon again appears to be the outlier in Big Oil as it is not writing down billions of U.S. dollars of asset values and continues to resist calls from sustainability-conscious investors to disclose price forecasts and account for climate change in the value of its assets and its future business.

Unlike its peers, Exxon hasn’t booked major writedowns since oil prices crashed earlier this year. And unlike its European peers, the U.S. supermajor hasn’t pledged any emission-reduction targets, either.

The lack of double-digit-billion writedowns at Exxon not only this year, but also in the past decade, raises two questions: does Exxon think that oil and gas prices will ultimately rise and therefore its assets fairly valued at a later date? Or has Exxon been doing some creative accounting in valuing its assets?

No Major Write Downs: Wishful Thinking Or Accounting Fraud?

Unlike Occidental, BP, and Shell, Exxon hasn’t yet adjusted the value of its assets, and hasn’t been doing much of that over the past decade.        

Franklin Bennett, a former senior accounting analyst at Exxon, alleges that the supermajor’s stubborn refusal to write down a large part of the value of natural gas producer XTO Energy Inc that it bought for US$31 billion ten years ago is part of an “arrogant, aberrant, long-standing…posture,” The Wall Street Journal reported this week, citing a complaint Bennett has filed with the SEC under its whistleblower program.  

According to Bennett, who left Exxon in 1995, the way Exxon accounted for the XTO deal fits its previous accounting practices of overestimating the value of its oil and gas assets. Bennett believes that the value of XTO should be written down by at least US$17 billion and that Exxon should make at least US$20 billion in writedowns on its other oil and gas assets, the Journal reports. Related: Oil Rallies On Bullish EIA Inventory Data

Exxon’s CEO at the time of the XTO acquisition, Rex Tillerson, admitted last year that “We probably paid too much,” because the outlook on gas prices was for them to stay at around US$5 per million British thermal units (MMBtu).

“Of course, it never saw those numbers again,” Tillerson said at a conference in June 2019.

Commenting on Exxon’s impairment accounting practices, Exxon spokesman Casey Norton told the Journal:

“Exxon Mobil’s record on impairments and our rigorous and consistent process for testing for impairments have been repeatedly scrutinized and upheld.”

Exxon has long explained the lack of huge writedowns – compared, for example, to Chevron’s US$11-billion impairment charge in Q4 2019 mostly in Appalachian natural gas – with the fact that it books the value of new oil and gas fields very conservatively and doesn’t adjust values to short-term price trends.

Last year, Exxon was found not guilty in a lawsuit brought by the state of New York, alleging the company had misled investors by failing to account for climate change in its disclosures.

Investors Press Exxon For Climate-Risk Disclosures 

But investors have upped the pressure on Big Oil to start accounting for climate change in its price assumptions. European majors have listened, and just last month, they lowered their oil price forecasts, which led to up to US$17.5 billion impairment charge at BP and up to a US$22 billion charge at Shell.

Exxon and Chevron, however, do not disclose their price assumptions. But their environment-conscious investors want this to change, investor coalition Ceres, the New York State Common Retirement Fund, and California State Teachers’ Retirement System, told Bloomberg this week.  

The investors want to know how U.S. Big Oil is viewing the impact of climate change and the energy transition on its assets and future business. Chevron views future scenarios as proprietary information, spokesman Sean Comey told Bloomberg in an emailed statement. Related: 3 Oil Stocks With Good Upside And 3 To Avoid

At this year’s shareholder meetings of the two U.S. oil giants, shareholders were asked to vote on climate-related issues proposed by investors.

Exxon’s shareholders rejected proposals for a report on lobbying and a report on the risks of petrochemical investments.

A shareholder proposal at Chevron, urging it to report on climate lobbying aligned with Paris Agreement Goals, however, passed, as some 53 percent of the votes cast voted for the proposal to report on climate lobbying.

BlackRock, for example, pushed for more climate action and transparency at Exxon and Chevron, after the world’s biggest asset manager said earlier this year that it would place sustainability at the center of its investment approach.

“As we have discussed during our most recent conversations with Exxon Mobil Corporation (Exxon), we continue to see a gap in the company’s disclosure and action with regard to several components of its climate risk management,” BlackRock said in its rationale for voting contrary to Exxon’s board’s recommendations.

After Exxon’s meeting, Edward Mason, Head of Responsible Investment for the Church Commissioners for England, said:

“Exxon needs to join its peers and set out a strategy for transition to net zero emissions. Investors will not tolerate a board that is not capable of steering a course consistent with the goals of the Paris Agreement.”

“We believe that ExxonMobil can do so much better, and that a change in strategy and governance can bring about a long overdue improvement in shareholder returns,” The New York State Common Retirement Fund and The Church Commissioners for England said in a letter to shareholders before the meeting. 

An Ocean Apart 

“Exxon, in particular, has made itself an outlier for its refusal to seriously account for the demands of a lower carbon global economy,” New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli said, commenting on the voting results at the annual shareholders’ meetings of U.S. companies this year.

With very little writedowns on asset values and with no emissions targets, Exxon looks increasingly distant from the European oil majors, many of which have pledged to become net-zero energy companies by 2050. 

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Arch Region on July 03 2020 said:
    When ExxonMobil files for chapter 11 we will know the end of the fossil fuel era has arrived.

    Soon there will be no dirty gasoline vehicles left on the roads of the world. 100% of the airplanes in the air and cargo ships criss crossing the oceans will be using hydrogen fuel if they are not electric. Hydrogen fuel or electricity will also exclusively power industrial production. Even fossil fuel plastics industry will be overtaken by the bioplastics. At that time the price of oil will decent in negative territory permanently. This scenario is unavoidable if demand for oil continues to erode.

    If this take place before the end of the decade is out, there is a good chance ExxonMobil will go the way of the famous Studebaker. Studebaker was a horse and buggy manufacturer before manufacturing electric and then gasoline cars. The name ExxonMobil will either be forgotten altogether or if it is remembered at all it will not be in connection to its original business being a petroleum giant.
  • Walk on July 03 2020 said:
    i will invest even more in Exxon because they are standing up to the LIE of global warming. we all know it's fake.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News