• 4 minutes Trump will meet with executives in the energy industry to discuss the impact of COVID-19
  • 8 minutes Charts of COVID-19 Fatality Rate by Age and Sex
  • 11 minutes Why Trump Is Right to Re-Open the Economy
  • 13 minutes Its going to be an oil bloodbath
  • 1 hour US Shale Resilience: Oil Industry Experts Say Shale Will Rise Again
  • 2 hours While China was covering up Covid-19 it went on an international buying spree for ventilators and masks. From Jan 7th until the end of February China bought 2.2 Billion masks !
  • 36 mins Ten days ago Trump sent New York Hydroxychloroquine. Being administered to infected. Covid deaths dropped last few days. Fewer on ventilators. Hydroxychloroquine "Cause and Effect" ?
  • 6 hours Marine based energy generation
  • 2 hours China Takes Axe To Alternative Energy Funding, Slashing Subsidies For Solar And Wind
  • 4 hours Today 127 new cases in US, 99 in China, 778 in Italy
  • 10 hours Real Death Toll In CCP Virus May Be 12X Official Toll
  • 20 hours What If ‘We’d Adopted A More Conventional Response To This Epidemic?’
  • 1 day Trafigura CEO Weir says, "We will see 30% to 35% drop in demand". That amounts to 35mm bbls/day glut ! OPEC+ 10 mm cut won't fix it. It's a DEMAND problem.
  • 40 mins Apple to Bypass Internet and Beam Directly to Phones
  • 6 hours Which producers will shut in first?
  • 16 hours TRUMP pushing Hydroxychloroquine + Zpak therapy forward despite FDA conservative approach. As he reasons, "What have we got to lose ?"
Alt Text

Is Gazprom’s LNG Megaproject Doomed To Fail?

Russia gas giant Gazprom has…

Alt Text

Big Oil Raises Debt To Ride Out Price Crash

As prices crashed, the supermajors…

Alt Text

Oil Market Data Is About To Get Very Ugly

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for Oilprice.com with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Premium Content

Consumers Aren’t Crazy About Electric Cars

Enthusiasm among drivers is lacking about autonomous vehicles and even electric cars, J.D. Power’s latest Mobility Confidence Index has revealed.

The results of the survey would be surprising—and bordering on shocking--for the proponents of EVs and all the headline space these vehicles are getting, with analyst forecasts for their adoption overwhelmingly optimistic. Unlike them, consumers are not as optimistic about the future of plug-in cars and self-driving vehicles.

According to the survey, electric cars scored a mobility confidence index reading of 55 on a scale of 100. Self-driving cars scored even lower, at 36 points, which would hardly be a surprise since this technology has yet to mature, and developing trust in it would be a long process.

“Out of the box, these scores are not encouraging,” said J.D. Power’s executive director of Driver Interaction & Human Machine Interface Research. “As automakers head down the developmental road to self-driving vehicles and greater electrification, it’s important to know if consumers are on the same road—and headed in the same direction. That doesn’t seem to be the case right now. Manufacturers need to learn where consumers are in terms of comprehending and accepting new mobility technologies—and what needs to be done.”

Indeed, the results are worrying, especially for EVs which have been hailed as the drivers of a transport revolution. According to the survey, there are still a lot of people who wouldn’t buy an EV: just 39 percent said they would buy one. Even more people don’t believe EVs are as reliable as ICE cars: 51 percent. One thing the majority of respondents in the survey were positive about in EVs was their beneficial effect on the environment.

Among the top problems noted by respondents were the length of time it takes an EV to charge and the length of its range. According to the majority, the former needs to be shortened and the latter extended before they would consider buying an electric vehicle.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage






Leave a comment
  • Annette Hunter on August 01 2019 said:
    Sufficient interest exists to sell every electric car made. Each car sold is another several neighbors and coworkers who see or experience an electric car.

    They sell themselves. A fact that's saved Tesla a billion on advertising.
  • James Hilden-Minton on August 01 2019 said:
    Actually, I find these encouraging for EV adoption. 68% of respondents have never even ridden in an EV. This lack of experience will steadily improve as more EVs hit the road. But even among those with zero experience with EVs, 40% of them would be interest in buying them.

    Also this survey confirms that potential EV buyers are looking for longer range vehicles. Specifically they are looking for 300 mile range vehicles. This is up considerably from a few years ago when most automakers though that 100 miles was adequate range. Tesla spotted this early on and now all three models (S, X and 3) have configurations with range in excess of 300 miles. The Long range Model S sports a 370 mile range, while the affordable Model 3 has a 330 mile range. Other automakers are trying to catch up.

    This survey intends to continue on a quarterly basis. So in time we will be able to see these scores shift. So we're starting out at a good place, huge acceptance for a product class that has only a few percent of the market. These numbers will rise as new and improved models come to market and as more people get basic exposure to the technologies.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on August 01 2019 said:
    Despite all the headline space electric vehicles (EVs) have been getting and despite the subsidies governments have been offering to those who buy EVs, there are still a lot of people who wouldn’t buy an EV. One reason is that the technology of internal combustion engines (ICEs) is improving year after year and becoming more and more environmentally-friendlier.

    But the bigger picture is that neither a post-oil era nor a peak oil demand or an imminent energy transition will see the light of day throughout the 21st century and far beyond. The reason is that all of them are myths.

    Global investors in renewable energy and electric vehicles (EVs) should heed three pivotal principles.

    The first is that there will be no post-oil era throughout the 21st century and probably far beyond. Oil will continue to reign supreme all through.

    The second principle is that there will be no peak oil demand either. While an increasing number of EVs on the roads coupled with government environmental legislation could decelerate the demand for oil, EVs could never replace oil in global transport throughout the 21st century and far beyond.

    The third principle is that with global oil consumption exceeding 100 million barrels a day (mbd), the notion of an imminent energy transition looks like an illusion.

    Some experts are now saying that a widespread EV use could spell the end of oil. The tipping point, they reckon, is 50 million EVs on the roads. This they believe could be reached by 2024. However, 50 million EVs could hardly make a dent on the global demand for oil let alone replace it.

    Currently, electric and hybrid cars combined number under 4 million cars out of 1.477 bn ICEs on the roads worldwide in 2015, or a negligible 0.27%. The total number of ICEs is projected to reach 2.0 bn by 2025 rising to 2.79 bn by 2040 according to US Research.

    In 2018 the world used 36.4 bn barrels of oil (bb) of which 73% or 26.6 bb were used to power 1.477 billion conventional cars around the world. Bringing 50 million EVs on the roads will reduce the global oil demand by only 0.9 bb, or 3.4%. This will neither be the end of oil as some experts are suggesting nor a tipping point.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News