• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 10 mins Could Someone Give Me Insights on the Future of Renewable Energy?
  • 12 hours How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 1 day "What’s In Store For Europe In 2023?" By the CIA (aka RFE/RL as a ruse to deceive readers)
  • 11 hours e-truck insanity
  • 4 days Bankruptcy in the Industry
  • 24 hours Oil Stocks, Market Direction, Bitcoin, Minerals, Gold, Silver - Technical Trading <--- Chris Vermeulen & Gareth Soloway weigh in
  • 4 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba

Haley Zaremba is a writer and journalist based in Mexico City. She has extensive experience writing and editing environmental features, travel pieces, local news in the…

More Info

Premium Content

China Is Preparing For Life After Fossil Fuels


The green energy revolution is redrawing the lines of the global geopolitical map and China is fighting to come out on top. While other energy superpowers such as the United States, Saudi Arabia, and Russia have clung to their prodigious oil and gas industries to varying degrees, China has gone all-in on establishing their own energy security and independence, a large portion of which will soon be sourced from clean energy resources. 

Europe has largely pivoted away from oil and gas in the past few years, recasting its Big Oil companies as Big Energy. Indeed, on the other side of the Atlantic Big Oil’s most profitable business is no longer oil as the companies derive more and more of their profits from trading rather than extraction. In the United States, oil supermajors have taken a far different approach to the impending existential threat of climate change and the clean energy transition. “While BP and other European companies invest billions in renewable energy, Exxon and Chevron are committed to fossil fuels and betting on moonshots,” the New York Times reported late last year

And the U.S. isn’t alone. Russia has taken an even harder line when it comes to petro-loyalty. President Vladimir Putin has been a staunch climate change denier, and the very idea of pivoting away from oil and gas has been anathema to his administration. Someone will sell the world’s last barrels of oil as the age of fossil fuels comes to an end, and Russia intends to be the one. This is a risky business, as Russia’s economy is dangerously reliant on fossil fuels, a market with a limited shelf life. As it stands, oil and gas make up more than 60 percent of Russia's total exports and add up to more than 30 percent of the nation’s gross domestic product (GDP). Indeed, petro-nations and oil-autocracies around the world risk descending into economic chaos and conflict as oil markets offer diminishing returns.  What’s more, as Europe has moved away from fossil fuels and toward more climate-friendly and economically promising options, countries like Russia and Saudi Arabia have become increasingly reliant on Asian markets to buy up their wares. This could prove to be their downfall. While China is currently the world’s biggest oil and coal importer, President Xi Jinping is getting serious about a homegrown clean energy revolution in the interest of shoring up Beijing’s geopolitical power and energy independence. “By 2060 the world’s second-largest economy aims to transform its power generation mix from roughly 70% from fossil fuels today to 90% from renewable sources such as wind and solar, as well as hydro and nuclear power,” Bloomberg reports

Related: Do Lithium Batteries Pose A Major Fire Hazard?

While the prognosis is grim for countries that have hedged their bets on Chinese demand for fossil fuels, countries that relied on resource-backed loans from Beijing are in even bigger trouble. One such country, Angola, has already delayed their payments, and “that’s before considering the impact of shifting energy financing priorities,” Bloomberg reports. “In June, China’s largest bank scrapped plans to fund a $3 billion coal-fired plant in Zimbabwe.”

China’s development of its clean energy production capacity not only stands to bolster the energy security of its own markets but also to imperil that of competing nations. China has been investing heavily in supply chains for essential components and rare earth minerals such as cobalt, giving them near-total control of some parts of clean energy technologies such as electric vehicle batteries and solar panels. 

What’s more, China is far outstripping the United States in technological investing and cutting-edge research and development. While China invests huge sums of money into positioning itself as a leading global innovator, the United States has struggled to pass spending bills that would give them any chance of catching up and staying competitive. What has passed is simply too little, too late

By Haley Zaremba for Oilprice.com


More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Yasser Arafat on August 15 2021 said:
    China has 184 coal-fired power plants under construction. It is also building and financing hundreds of other coal-fired power plants in countries such as Turkey, Vietnam, Indonesia, Philippines, Egypt, and Bangladesh. This story is nonsense.
  • Mamdouh Salameh on August 15 2021 said:
    Energy security has always been uppermost in China’s strategic thinking. Therefore it is wise for China as the world’s largest economy based on purchasing power parity (PPP) and also the largest consumer of energy to plan for life after fossil fuels.

    However, this day will never see the light of day throughout the 21st century and probably far beyond or ever. There are economic and technical reasons for that.

    The economic reasons are that the global economy will continue to run on oil and gas well into the future. Furthermore, there won’t be an alternative as versatile and practicable as oil in the next 100 years.

    The technical reason is that the current recovery factor (R/F) from oil wells averages 34%-35% meaning that an oil well is normally abandoned with 64%-65% of its oil reserves still in place. The good thing is that the abandoned wells are revisited once technology manages to improve the R/f factor. The bad thing is that it takes a minimum of 10 years for technology to lift the R/F by 2%-3%, hence the longevity of oil reserves not to mention new discoveries.

    Even by the turn of the 21st century China and the rest of the world will still be using Arab, Venezuelan and Russian oil barrels.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Alan Dr on August 15 2021 said:
    For China we can also expect because of its demographic situation an imminent population collapse with estimates that the country its population will decline by half at the end of the century.
  • Steve Mc on August 20 2021 said:
    "Vladimir Putin has been a staunch climate change denier."

    What is your source for such a fallacious claim? Putin has witnessed with his own eyes that the ice is melting quickly in the Arctic which accounts for usage of the Northern Sea Route year round. He is deeply concerned with the melting permafrost which billions of $$$$$ of their energy industry sits which could lead to devastation of the environment as well.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News