• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 1 day How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 2 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 10 days For those of you who are full of __it.
4 Questions About the Future of Electricity

4 Questions About the Future of Electricity

Despite skepticism about climate change,…

Argentina Prepares for Oil IPO As Milei Reform Gets Underway

Argentina Prepares for Oil IPO As Milei Reform Gets Underway

Argentine oil driller Petrolera Aconcagua…

Kurt Cobb

Kurt Cobb

Kurt Cobb is a freelance writer and communications consultant who writes frequently about energy and environment. His work has also appeared in The Christian Science…

More Info

Premium Content

Can U.S. Shale Overcome Its Cash Flow Problem?

oil rig

I'm tempted to say the following to the writers of two recent pieces (here and here) outlining the continuing negative free cash flow of companies fracking for oil in America: "Tell me something I don't already know."

But apparently their message (which has been true for years) needs to be repeated. This is because investors can't seem to understand the significance of what those two pieces make abundantly clear: The shale oil industry in the United States is using investor money to subsidize oil consumers and to line the pockets of top management with no long-term plan to build value.

There is no other conclusion to draw from the fact that free cash flow continues to be wildly negative for those companies most deeply dependent on U.S. shale oil deposits. For those to whom "free cash flow" is a new term, let me explain: It is operating cash flow (that is, cash generated from operations meaning the sale of oil and related products) minus capital expenditures. If this number remains negative for too long for a company or an industry, it's an indication that something is very wrong.

Only nine of 33 shale oil exploration and production companies reviewed in the report cited above had positive free cash flow for the first half of 2018. This is even though prices had risen all the way from a low of around $30 in 2016 to the mid-$70 range by the middle of this year.

To get an idea of just how bad it has been even through periods when the price of oil averaged above $100 in 2011, 2012, 2013 and most of 2014, here are the annual free cash flows in dollars of those 33 companies combined since 2010 and they are all negative: -14 billion (2010), -21.9 billion (2011), -37.8 billion (2012), -16.8 billion (2013), -33 billion (2014), -34.4 billion (2015), -18.3 billion (2016), -15.5 billion (2017).

Capital expenditures are what companies invest in future production—in this case, the acquisition of new oil deposits and the drilling and completion of new wells and associated infrastructure. Because operating cash flow has not been sufficient to cover the drilling of new wells, companies must either issue new debt or new shares to raise money to do so. The former makes companies more likely to go bankrupt if oil prices turn down and the latter dilutes the value of the company for existing shareholders. Either way, it's not good news for investors.

So, maybe you are asking: "Why don't the companies save up enough money to drill new wells before they go prospecting?" The answer lies in understanding the decline rates of existing wells. After three years most shale wells are producing 70 to 90 percent less oil than when they began. (Compare this to the worldwide decline rate for oil production of between 4 and 5 percent per year which over three years comes to between 11 to 14 percent.) The situation has been likened to trying to run up a down escalator. The faster the escalator is going down (well decline rates), the harder it is to make any progress going up (that is, increase production). In order to keep a company's overall production growing, the company must drill continuously or risk declining production which would lead to a vicious cycle of declining cash flows needed to drill new wells.  Related: The Clock Is Ticking: How Much Oil Will Iran Lose?

To avoid this scenario, such companies seek extra money every year in the form of debt and/or stock issuance in order to fund new drilling. Now here's why this is unworkable in the long run. An example outside the industry will help illustrate the problem: A company engaged in manufacturing might be able to justify negative free cash flow for years as it builds out its manufacturing facilities to make more products in more markets.

After a few years if the strategy works, the company could be well-positioned to dominate its markets and make a handsome profit for investors. Things, of course, don't always work out the way companies want them to. But there is a logic to continuous investment in such a company in the face of negative free cash flow. This is because investors have reason to believe they are building long-term profitability. Factories stick around; they suffer wear and tear, but they don't deplete as oil does. And, those who run them tend to get better over time at making their factories more productive, not less.

The same cannot be said for companies which extract shale oil because of its high decline rate. If operating cash flows are not sufficient to fund capital expenditures relatively soon after the company begins its drilling program, then the company must drill furiously simply to avoid a production decline let alone achieve the production increases which are good for stock prices.

Production increases can actually be achieved for a time with a lot of effort and expenditure. But, here's the problem: As the number of producing wells rises sharply, the number of wells that must be drilled each year JUST TO KEEP PRODUCTION LEVEL RISES SHARPLY AS WELL. At some point, the best most productive places to drill are used up. The company must move on to places that are less productive and so must drill even more wells than it otherwise would have (usually at higher costs) just to keep production level.

The shale oil companies say that technology will solve the problem. But so far, the evidence suggests that the decline curves are getting steeper. Production from new wells is falling faster than before, an indication that companies are already moving away from the best prospects to more marginal deposits. The largest independent oil company operating in the shale oil industry, Pioneer Natural Resources, suffered a decline of 56 percent in the rate of production in 2017 from wells in production at the end of 2016. That means that the company had to replace more than half its production last year with new wells BEFORE it could grow production (which it managed to do). Related: Can Russia Relieve The Iranian Oil Crisis?

But as the herculean efforts to grow production face greater and greater decline rates and the need to replace falling production from a larger and larger number of EXISTING wells, it will at some point become impossible to grow production or even to maintain it. The number of new wells which must be drilled will exceed the number of suitable places to drill them and/or the capacity of drilling equipment available.

That's the point at which the jig is up. That moment could be brought forward for companies if the price of oil crashes or if the economy crashes and investment dollars stop flowing to the shale oil companies. If companies cannot finance extensive new drilling continuously, the illusion of success will be shown for what it is.


Meanwhile, top management keeps getting paid bonuses to burn investor cash and consumers get oil for less than the actual long-term cost of production. It's one of those rare instances in which the top 1 percent (and a lot of other suckers) are lured by an incomplete understanding into an investment that subsidizes the lives of the 99 percent.

But don't count on this arrangement lasting far into the future. The day of reckoning is coming. Those who can figure out precisely when or simply get lucky guessing when can make a fortune on the downside by betting against what some have call the shale oil Ponzi scheme. There is a way, however, to profit from any Ponzi scheme if you are already invested in one and you recognize it: Get out before it comes crashing down!

By Kurt Cobb

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Randy Verret on November 01 2018 said:
    I certainly agree that the current domestic production rates are not sustainable, if folks are (largely) counting on shale production. I have a feeling those record U.S production numbers in the 11 million bbl/day range (and above) will be short lived...
  • thor on November 01 2018 said:
    I've been hearing this story for years yet the predictions of the shale oil crash never seem to materialize into anything.
  • Agree on November 02 2018 said:
    Yes we have been hearing this story for years, and nothing has happened. But that is the nature of the beast as these Companies and their investors can`t find a way out of the prediccament they have put themselves in. If they stop investing cash-flow dwindles and they`ll have the creditors on the doorstep. If they continue to invest they will rack up more debt but there is a small hope somebody will buy you and thereby rescue you. In that situation a hail mary is better than certain Death. So they put a positive spin on something that is basicly a turd and raise Money.

    There is another point many underestimate, if shale had been as fantastic as some claim the majors would have bought it wholesale. That has not happened, the majors just participate on a small scale to get a feeling for what it is probably with the intention to buy on the cheap in the future as the shale Companies fail. When the day of reckoning comes for shale this will have repercussions for the global oil-market. Considerably higher oil prices will follow, and those who have bought the failing Companies on the cheap will be able to profit handsomely in the future. But in order to do this they need to gain experience in the sector today.
  • Stephen Bowers on November 02 2018 said:
    Right on the nail. Though some have made money in the past 12 months it is not a pretty sight. Just remember that the US has well over half of all oil wells in production, and produces about 1/8 of the supply. Saudi Arabia manages about the same oil output with under 4000 producing wells against the US >500,000. That is not a misprint, it is on the EIA and OPEC websites for all to read. The US has over 8000 DUC's many of which are dead DUC's that will never be completed and the DUC pile is growing month by month. When the bubble will burst one can only speculate on, but I do not see decades of oil production at 10 mb/d and some of the petchem investments might not be such a good investment as well. Tread very carefully if you are an investor..
  • CorvetteKid on November 02 2018 said:
    If this entire shale operaiton were a Ponzi Scheme, wouldn't a bunch of savvy hedge funds be shorting these stocks up the wazoo ? I recall David Einhorn of Lehman Fame did some negative calls on Pioneer (PXD) a few years ago. Nothing much happened.

    I note a few items:

    (1) Most of the Doom-and-Gloom predictions centered around bankruptcies from $26/bbl. oil in 2016. Only highly-levered reckless operators went under.

    (2) Most of the E&Ps have manageable debt levels.

    (3) Extraction and well costs continue to fall. This improves ROEs and the ability to drill new wells.

    (4) Oil prices may rise further.

    I find it hard to believe that a well-covered sector -- Energy and E&P stocks -- could have a ticking time bomb embeded within and nobody has found this out except perma bears. Not hedge funds, not mutual funds, not Warren Buffet, nobody.

    Even those expressing caution on shale growth potential are NOT saying it is a Ponzi Scheme.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News