• 4 minutes Nord Stream 2 Halt Possible Over Navalny Poisoning
  • 8 minutes America Could Go Fully Electric Right Now
  • 11 minutes JP Morgan says investors should prepare for rising odds of Trump win
  • 3 hours Permian in for Prosperous and Bright Future
  • 7 hours Daniel Yergin Book is a Reality Check on Energy
  • 3 hours YPF to redeploy rigs in Vaca Muerta on export potential
  • 2 hours Gepthermal fracking: how to confuse a greenie
  • 14 hours US after 4 more years of Trump?
  • 7 hours Top HHS official takes leave of absence after Facebook rant about CDC conspiracies
  • 2 hours Oil giants partner with environmental group to track Permian Basin's methane emissions
  • 18 hours The Perfect Solution To Remove Conflict Problems In The South China East Asia Sea
  • 2 days US Oil Refinery Fexibility
  • 3 days China Must Prepare for War Says State Media
  • 3 days Interconnection queues across the US are loaded with gigawatts of solar, wind and storage
  • 1 day Surviving without coal is a challenge!!
  • 2 days Portuguese government confirms world record solar price of $0.01316/kWh

The EU Agrees To Cut Emissions To Net Zero By 2050

The European Union agreed to cut its total emissions to net-zero by 2050 after ten hours of debates as Eastern European states demanded financial help to hit the target.

Reuters reports that one EU member state was left out of the agreement: Poland. Poland has opposed the ambitious emissions plan, saying it will cost too much to implement. In October, Energy Minister Krzysztof Tchorzewski put the price tag of this transition to between $760 and $980 million, saying “Of course, these costs would obviously be spread over years. But I treat it as a fantasy when someone says that Poland is able to reach the zero-emission goal by 2050.”

As a result, the EU agreed to let it off the hook for now on the promise the country will revisit the issue next June. The union also allowed the Czech Republic to include nuclear energy in its energy mix, Reuters reports.

The agreement comes a day after the EU approved the net-zero emissions plan, which will cost it $111.7-billion (100 billion euro). Dividing these costs among the members proved to be tricky as well as navigating between the demands of individual countries.

“We cannot allow Brussels bureaucrats to have poor people and poor countries to pay the costs of the fight against climate change,” Hungary’s PM Victor Orban said ahead of the discussions as quoted by Reuters, summing up the misgivings that most new EU members have about the union’s climate change plan.

Related: Lower Oil Production Will Cause Saudi Budget Deficit To Balloon

Indeed, the Czech Republic’s insistence that it should get financial aid from the EU to build nuclear plants in order to reduce its dependence on coal ran into opposition from more affluent member states including Germany, Austria, and Luxembourg. Yet the country gets half of its energy from coal, and to hit the EU’s 2050 targets it would have to reduce this significantly.

Poland generates as much as 80 percent of its electricity from coal, which makes its unwillingness to commit to 2050 understandable. According to reports, the country tried to push the deadline 20 years further during the discussions.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Rod Keh on December 13 2019 said:
    This is just a tax grab and wealth redistribution and has nothing to do with CO2 or climate.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News