• 3 minutes e-car sales collapse
  • 6 minutes America Is Exceptional in Its Political Divide
  • 11 minutes Perovskites, a ‘dirt cheap’ alternative to silicon, just got a lot more efficient
  • 2 days How Far Have We Really Gotten With Alternative Energy
  • 1 day By Kellen McGovern Jones - "BlackRock Behind New TX-LA Offshore Wind Farm"
  • 9 days Natron Energy Achieves First-Ever Commercial-Scale Production of Sodium-Ion Batteries in the U.S.
  • 9 days Bad news for e-cars keeps coming
  • 7 days The United States produced more crude oil than any nation, at any time.
  • 11 days RUSSIA - Turkey & India Stop Buying Russian Oil as USA Increases Crackdown on Sanctions
ING Sees $88 Brent In Q3 2024

ING Sees $88 Brent In Q3 2024

ING updated its Brent crude…

Will China's Central Bank Cut Rates to Boost Sagging Economy?

Will China's Central Bank Cut Rates to Boost Sagging Economy?

China's consumer price inflation slows…

Tesla Shareholder BlackRock Voted Against Musk As Chair

Funds controlled by BlackRock Inc voted in favor of a quashed proposal to separate Elon Musk’s chairman and CEO roles at Tesla at the EV maker’s shareholders’ meeting back in June, over Tesla’s board recommendation that shareholders vote against, BlackRock filings with the SEC showed on Thursday.

BlackRock funds are among the top ten institutional shareholders at Tesla, and according to Thomson Reuters data compiled from filings, funds under BlackRock’s control hold almost 6.5 million of Tesla’s 170 million shares.

At the meeting in June, Tesla’s shareholders were asked to vote on a proposal by one stockholder that the company’s chair be an independent director, not Elon Musk, who has been chairman since 2004 and is also the chief executive officer. Tesla’s board, however, recommended that shareholders voted against that proposal, arguing that “the Company’s success to date would not have been possible if the Board was led by another director lacking Elon Musk’s day-to-day exposure to the Company’s business.”

The majority of Tesla shareholders shot down the proposal to separate Elon Musk’s roles at Tesla “by a wide margin”, the company’s General Counsel Todd Maron said at the meeting.

Another institutional investor—albeit with a much smaller stake—the world’s largest sovereign wealth fund, Norway’s US$1-trillion Government Pension Fund Global, was also in the minority that voted for replacing Musk as chairman.

Musk has recently drawn a lot of attention after saying he would take Tesla private, and then backtracking on that proposal two weeks later.

Related: Airlines Are Suspending Flights Because Fuel Is Too Expensive

Tesla will stay public, Elon Musk said at the end of last week, ending more than two weeks of speculation and calculation about how much a go-private deal would cost and who could be involved in it.

Wall Street and investors were shocked by Musk’s tweet that he would take Tesla private at $420 a share, sparking speculation whether the funding for doing so is really ‘secured’ as he said in his tweet, and who would step in to raise the funding.

“Although the majority of shareholders I spoke to said they would remain with Tesla if we went private, the sentiment, in a nutshell, was ‘please don’t do this,’” Musk said last week.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Bob on August 31 2018 said:
    Musk is brilliant, but should never have been made head of the company. He's an idea man who should instead be head of, planning the future, where his ideas are clearly changing automobiles, but not a day to day manager, administrator, that should be hired. For practical purposes, Musk is something like Jobs and Wozniak, visionaries.

Leave a comment

EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News