• 4 minutes Get First Access To The Oilprice App!
  • 7 minutes Blame Oil Price or EVs for Car Market Crash? Auto Recession Has Started
  • 11 minutes Japanese Refiners Load First Iran Oil Cargo Since U.S. Sanctions
  • 13 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 1 hour *Happy Dance* ... U.S. Shale Oil Slowdown
  • 17 mins Is Natural Gas Renewable? I say yes it is.
  • 46 mins Emissions from wear of brakes and tyres likely to be higher in supposedly clean vehicles, experts warn
  • 8 hours Oceans "Under Fire" Of Plastic Trash
  • 2 hours Making Fun of EV Owners: ICE-ing Trend?
  • 11 hours Algorithms Taking Over Oil Fields
  • 1 day How Is Greenland Dealing With Climate Change?
  • 13 hours Europe Slipping into Recession?
  • 18 hours Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 20 mins Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 1 day Germany: Russia Can Save INF If It Stops Violating The Treaty
  • 23 mins Chinese FDI in U.S. Drops 90%: America's Clueless Tech Entrepreneurs
  • 8 hours Orphan Wells
The Tech Transforming The Energy Industry

The Tech Transforming The Energy Industry

Decentralized energy solutions are sprouting…

Can Mozambique Avoid The ‘Resource Curse’?

Can Mozambique Avoid The ‘Resource Curse’?

Mozambique, like many other resource…

Tesla Faces 3 Lawsuits Over “Funding Secured” Tweet

Elon Musk

Tesla and more specifically its chief executive Elon Musk are facing three lawsuits over an already notorious tweet by Musk, in which the CEO said he was planning to take the company private and had already secured funding.

It was this phrase, “funding secured”, that alerted the Securities and Exchange Commission, which launched a probe into this claim, prompting Musk to come forward with the revelation that he had for years been in talks with the Saudi sovereign wealth fund to take the company private.

Yet the tweet and the following explanation caused changes in the Tesla stock price within two days, which allegedly affected shareholders who bought Tesla stock in the period.

As the law firm representing plaintiffs in the latest among the three cases states in an update, “On August 7, 2018, Tesla CEO Elon Musk proclaimed via social media that “[a]m considering taking Tesla private at $420. Funding secured,” among other things. On this news, Tesla shares soared to close at $379.57 that day. On August 9, 2018, media reports highlighted a probe by the SEC into the veracity and nature of Musk’s statements as well as an investigation by Tesla’s Board of Directors into the “secured” funding.

On this news, the price of Tesla’s shares plummeted.”

Related: Is Deepwater Drilling More Profitable Than Shale?

All three lawsuits seek class action status, but while the first one seeks to represent shareholders who only bought Tesla shares on August 7 and 8, the second one seeks plaintiffs that bought and sold Tesla stock in the period. The third lawsuit has extended the period, seeking shareholders who bough or sold Tesla stock between August 7 and 10.

The allegations made in the three lawsuits are identical, according to a CNN report: Musk had given misleading information to, basically, get back at short sellers. Yet, the information may not have been misleading if it was true, one legal expert told CNN.

According to Pennsylvania University business law professor Jill Fisch, the lawsuits against Musk and Tesla only have a chance if the plaintiffs can prove that Musk had not sought funding for the operation and had not, in fact, “secured” it.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News