• 4 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 8 minutes Read: OPEC WILL KILL US SHALE
  • 12 minutes Tidal Power Closer to Commercialisation
  • 16 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 1 hour Why U.S. Growers Are Betting The Farm On Soybeans Amid China Trade War
  • 6 hours Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 8 mins US-backed coup in Venezuela not so smooth
  • 8 hours BATTLE ROYAL: Law of "Supply and Demand". vs. OPEC/Saudi Oil Cartel
  • 18 hours Solar to Become World's Largest Power Source by 2050
  • 1 day THE DEATH OF FOSSIL FUEL MARKETS
  • 1 day Sounds Familiar: Netanyahu Tells Arab Citizens They’re Not Real Israelis
  • 8 hours Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
  • 1 day Can OPEC CUT PRODUCTION FOREVER?
  • 1 day Boeing Faces Safety Questions After Second 737 Crash In Five Months
  • 7 hours Trump Tariffs On China Working
  • 23 hours Exxon Aims For $15-a-Barrel Costs In Giant Permian Operation
Crude Oil Stocks Rise Despite U.S. Sanctions

Crude Oil Stocks Rise Despite U.S. Sanctions

U.S. sanctions haven’t led to…

The Oil Majors Aiming To Save Alaska’s LNG Dreams

The Oil Majors Aiming To Save Alaska’s LNG Dreams

Just when regulators and energy…

Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks

Oil slick

Sanchi, the Iranian tanker carrying condensate to South Korea that crashed into a Chinese freight ship on January 6 and sank earlier this week, has produced two oil slicks, Chinese authorities report. There were several explosions on board the tanker, the last one proving fatal for the vessel.

Cleanup teams from China are now working to remove the slicks and are also monitoring the area to see which way they could drift, and assess the ecological impact of the disaster, which is the biggest one in decades in the area.

The Sanchi carried almost a million barrels of condensate, the ultralight petroleum liquid that is much more flammable than crude oil. It is also colorless and odorless, which makes cleanup difficult. The tanker has been located at a depth of almost 500 feet between China’s Zhejiang province and the Japanese island of Ryukyu.

Chinese scientists are now analyzing the ways in which the spill could affect the environment in the East China Sea and have come up with three possible scenarios, according to a South China Morning Post report.

Under the first scenario, traces from the spill could reach as far as the western North American coast as the tanker sank several dozen kilometers from the Black Tide—a current that is as strong as the Gulf Stream and is connected to the North Pacific Current, which reaches east of British Columbia and then splits into two currents, one heading up to Alaska and the other down to California.

The second scenario, in case pollutants don’t reach the Black Tide, sees any environmental damage restricted to the South China Sea, but the extent of the damage to marine ecosystems has yet to be established.

The third scenario, put forward by an offshore biology researcher, sees minimal damage if the pollutants reach the Black Tide, as they will, Guan Weibin argues, get diluted in the Pacific Ocean.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • jack on January 17 2018 said:
    Environmentalists and fisheries officials fear the damage done to this region could be immense. In addition to the oil, there were thousands of gallons AFFF firefighting foam used to attempt to extinguish the fire. AFFF degrades to substances that are persistent, bio-accumulating and carcinogenic. Organisms low down on the food chain will feed and pick up these chemicals which in turn will be eaten by fish then by us. See the Madrid Statement.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News