• 3 minutes China has *Already* Lost the Trade War. Meantime, the U.S. Might Sanction China’s Largest Oil Company
  • 7 minutes Saudi and UAE pressure to get US support for Oil quotas is reportedly on..
  • 11 minutes China devalues currency to lower prices to address new tariffs. But doesn't help. Here is why. . . .
  • 15 minutes What is your current outlook as a day trader for WTI
  • 1 hour In The Bright Of New Administration Rules: Immigrants as Economic Contributors
  • 5 hours Will Uncle Sam Step Up and Cut Production
  • 11 mins Long Range Attack On Saudi Oil Field Ends War On Yemen
  • 10 hours Domino Effect: Rashida Tlaib Rejects Israel's Offer For 'Humanitarian' Visit To West Bank
  • 10 hours Gretta Thunbergs zero carbon voyage carbon foot print of carbon fibre manufacture
  • 2 hours * 8 to 10 "good" years left in oil industry * UAE model for Economic Deversification * Others spent oil billions on terrorism, wars, lopping off heads * Too late now
  • 5 hours CLIMATE PANIC! ELEVENTY!!! "250,000 people die a year due to the climate crisis"
  • 11 hours Continental Resource's Hamm wants shale to cut production. . . He can't compete with peers.
  • 16 hours NATGAS, LNG, Technology, benefits etc , cleaner global energy fuel
  • 24 hours Significant: Boeing Delays Delivery Of Ultra-Long-Range Version Of 777X
  • 1 day Strait Of Hormuz As a Breakpoint: Germany Not Taking Part In U.S. Naval Mission
  • 23 hours Why Oil is Falling (including conspiracy theories and other fun stuff)
  • 14 hours Trump vs. Xi Trade Battle, Running Commentary from Conservative Tree House
  • 6 hours US Petroleum Demand Strongest Since 2007
Can Oil Markets Withstand Recession Fears?

Can Oil Markets Withstand Recession Fears?

The trade war escalation combined…

Is The Russia-Korea Pipeline Feasible?

Pipeline

The chances of a gas pipeline from Russia to South Korea through the territory of North Korea—a decade-old idea that was on hold due to North Korea’s hostilities—have now risen with the recent rapprochement between the North and South, but political and economic hurdles to the project remain.

South Korea’s state-run Korea Gas Corp (KOGAS) and Russian gas giant Gazprom will carry out a joint pipeline study, Reuters reports, quoting South Korea’s energy ministry.

Resource-poor South Korea imports most of its energy, and until recently it was the world’s second-biggest liquefied natural gas (LNG) importer, before China surpassed it last year.

Gazprom has resumed talks with South Korea over the idea to build the gas pipeline from Russia’s Far East to South Korea through North Korea, Vitaly Markelov, Deputy Chairman of Gazprom’s Management Committee, said two weeks ago.

Gazprom had the idea to deliver 10 bcm of natural gas to the resource-poor and import-dependent South Korea by pipeline, but its route must pass through the territory of North Korea. Russia and South Korea signed a “road map” in 2011, but have not advanced beyond that, due to the tense regional situation.

At the end of March, South Korea’s Foreign Minister Kang Kyung-wha said that the idea of moving the gas through North Korea could be revived if the security situation on the Korean peninsula improved.

Despite the recent rapprochement, critics to a Trans-Korea pipeline point out several obstacles that the project faces. One is that Russia has often been seen as using gas supplies as a political tool. Another is that both North Korea and Russia are under U.S. sanctions, to various degrees, which makes looking for financing and partners somewhat difficult. A third point made by the project’s critics is that it would be safer for South Korea to continue importing LNG, and with rising U.S. LNG exports—more LNG from the United States.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Douglas Houck on June 30 2018 said:
    Sounds viable.
  • Mamdouh G Salameh on June 30 2018 said:
    Until recently, South Korea was the world’s second-biggest importer of liquefied natural gas (LNG), before China surpassed it last year. So it makes sense to build a trans-Korea gas pipeline to transport gas from Russia’s Far East to South Korea through North Korea.

    While the Trans-Korea pipeline was a decade-old idea, it has been recently revived by both South Korea and Russia’s giant gas company, Gazprom, with the recent thawing of relations between South and North Koreas.

    If built, the Trans-Korea pipeline will deliver 10 billion cubic metres a year (bcm/y) of Russian natural gas to South Korea through the territory of North Korea. However, all depends on a continued rapprochement between the two Koreas.

    Critics of a Trans-Korea pipeline point out several obstacles that the project faces. One hurdle is that Russia has often been seen as using gas supplies as a political tool. Another hurdle is that both North Korea and Russia are under US sanctions, which makes looking for financing and partners somewhat difficult. A third hurdle is that it would be safer for South Korea to continue importing LNG, and with rising US LNG exports—more LNG from the United States.

    On the other hand, proponents of the project provide the following rebuttals. They say that while it is true that Russia sometimes uses gas supplies as a political tool, this is no different from the United States using sanctions against countries with which it doesn’t see eye to eye to achieve some geopolitical aims. The second point is the fact that while Russia and North Korea are under US sanctions, the sanctions and the threats of sanctions against Russia and Germany respectively have not stopped them from going ahead with building the Nord Stream 2 pipeline bringing Russian gas under the Baltic Sea to Germany and the European Union (EU). The third point is that buying Russian piped gas is far cheaper than buying LNG particularly US LNG.

    Russia has been building many pipelines to deliver its natural gas to every corner of Eurasia through the Turkstream and the Nord Stream 2 to the EU and through the power of Siberia to China and eventually to India. Moreover, Russia and Japan are actively discussing construction of a natural gas supply pipeline from Sakhalin (a Russian island in the Pacific Ocean) to Japan. So a Trans-Korea pipeline will not be out of place in Russia’s grand plan of supplying the world with its gas.

    The reality of the 21st century—as Putin sees it—is that energy is a political instrument. Political alliances and the rise and fall of the international importance of particular countries will change in accordance with the energy supply routes.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play