• 4 minutes Is The Three Gorges Dam on the Brink of Collapse?
  • 8 minutes The Coal Industry May Never Recover From The Pandemic
  • 11 minutes China Raids Bank and Investor Accounts
  • 2 hours Sources confirm Trump to sign two new Executive orders.
  • 16 hours CV19: New York 21% infection rate + 40% Existing T-Cell immunity = 61% = Herd Immunity ?
  • 1 min Sometimes I Think Trump Supporters on This Forum Are Russians
  • 3 hours No More Love: Kanye West Breaks With Trump, Claims 2020 Run Is Not A Stunt
  • 10 hours In a Nutshell...
  • 28 mins Better Days Are (Not) Coming: Fed Officials Suggest U.S. Recovery May Be Stalling
  • 15 hours A Real Reality Check on "Green Hydrogen"
  • 5 hours During March, April, May the states with the highest infections/deaths were NY, NJ, Ma. . . . . Today (June) the three have the best numbers. How ? Herd immunity ?
  • 1 day Why Wind is pitiful for most regions on earth
  • 1 day Why Oil could hit $100
  • 1 hour Putin Paid Militants to Kill US Troops
  • 7 hours Where is Alberta, Canada headed?
  • 3 days Coronavirus hype biggest political hoax in history

Enbridge Line 3 Pipeline Gets Go Ahead After Hard-Fought Battle

The Minnesota Public Utilities Commission has approved the proposed replacement of Enbridge’s Line 3 pipeline despite the vocal environmentalist opposition. The decision should provide some relief to Canadian oil producers as the new pipeline will allow them to send more crude to U.S. refineries.

The 1,031-mile pipeline was built about six decades ago and runs from Edmonton, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin, where Enbridge operates an oil terminal. Because of its age, the pipeline is corroding and cracking, which makes oil transportation riskier—a fact that has forced Enbridge to reduce the flow of oil by about half of the pipeline’s capacity of 760,000 bpd.

One might wonder why replacing a corroded pipeline with a new—hence safer—would cause one would become the object of such strong opposition, but it seems that these days the very word “pipeline” sounds dangerous to certain groups of people.

The Minnesota Utilities Commission’s deciding panel, however, is not among them. It approved the environmental assessment for the project that Enbridge presented earlier this year, and now it has approved the final route of the pipeline.

Related: The Saudis Won’t Prevent The Next Oil Shock

The authority has also issued a certificate of need to the company, which carries the condition that Enbridge will guarantee it will foot the bill for any environmental damage from the infrastructure and will remove parts of the pipeline that are no longer in use, at the request of landowners. The new pipeline will not follow the original Line 3 route.

Opponents of the project did not take the news calmly. In fact, a group of them interrupted the PUC meeting, and threats of a repeat of the Dakota Access saga ensued.

“What they have done to us today is egregious,” the head of an activist group called Honor the Earth said. “They have gotten their Standing Rock. We will do everything that is needed to stop this pipeline,” Winona LaDuke said.

The PUC’s decision can be appealed and, in all likelihood, it will be. Yet supporters of the US$7.5-billion project, including business and labor groups, applauded the decision, as US$2.6 billion of the total will be spent in Minnesota.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage



Leave a comment
  • Jeremy David Whillans on June 29 2018 said:
    Truly fantastic news, I for one hope that we are seeing the environmental lobby at the height of its power and i truly pray that power will soon be on the decline. I hope my generation can see a few decades of common sense regimes where projects that make sense meet little opposition, the current high priesthood of environmental totalitarianism is not sustainable.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News