• 6 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Why hydrogen economics is does not work
  • 7 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 2 hours The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 9 hours Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 5 hours Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 14 hours Anyone Worried About the Lira Dragging EVERYTHING Else Down?
  • 7 hours Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 18 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
  • 7 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 19 hours Correlation does not equal causation, but they do tend to tango on occasion
  • 1 day WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 18 hours Russia retaliate: Our Response to U.S. Sanctions Will Be Precise And Painful
  • 20 hours Monsanto hit by $289 Million for cancerous weedkiller
  • 1 day California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
Dollar Strength Is Likely To Cap Oil Price Gains

Dollar Strength Is Likely To Cap Oil Price Gains

An exceptionally strong dollar and…

Zainab Calcuttawala

Zainab Calcuttawala

Zainab Calcuttawala is an American journalist based in Morocco. She completed her undergraduate coursework at the University of Texas at Austin (Hook’em) and reports on…

More Info

Enbridge Line 3 Faces Dakota Access-Style Opposition

Pipeline

Enbridge’s Line 3 pipeline should progress as planned, despite the intense scrutiny it faces in Minnesota as an oil and gas project, according to new reports emerging from the area.

“A lot of the people here are from Standing Rock, and learned a lot about what happens when people stand together, and the power of that, and the creation of a global movement,” says Tara Zhaabowekwe Houska in a Makwa Camp video. The Standing Rock Sioux tribe resisted efforts by Energy Transfer Partners to build a pipeline without a proper environmental evaluation. The effort ultimately failed, allowing the company to build its infrastructure project.

By mid-2019, the Line 3 should be complete, according to the Al Monaco CEO, who spoke to a local news station in Minnesota.

Still, regulators in the state continue to review environmental and regulatory commitments in order to guarantee the health and safety of local citizens.

As reported by the local CTV news, protests against the lines have been on the rise, with commissions cancelling two public hearings in the past week over logistical and public safety issues.

"Line 3 is a key piece of infrastructure that supplies the U.S. Midwest and Gulf Coast markets, and ultimately it's critical in maintaining low gasoline prices for Americans,” Enbridge says.

Related: Will The Third Great Energy Revolution End The Oil & Gas Industry?

The company’s partner, Monaco, added:

"Putting capital at risk in uncertain environments is something that we're going to be very cautious about, and I'm pretty sure the other pipeline midstream companies would tell you the same thing. I think we've probably seen a switch in the industry over the last few years, where we're going to have to have a proper sharing of the risk before we actually get regulatory permits.”

The uncertain environment of concern refers to three years of oil prices, which have devastated commodities markets and made it difficult for investors to commit to oil and gas ventures – both new and old.

By Zainab Calcuttawala for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Johnny Potowatomi on November 04 2017 said:
    The author of this article is a dimwit.
    Get with the times dummy... You aren't in Calcutta anymore.. green energy is the way of the future.. F*ck big oil companies, especially Enbridge... None of that oil goes to the US... It's all shipped overseas & the only jobs that they create are the jobs of cleanup after their spills..

    Get a life dummy!
  • NickSJ on November 03 2017 said:
    "The Standing Rock Sioux tribe resisted efforts by Energy Transfer Partners to build a pipeline without a proper environmental evaluation. "

    False. Green religious fanatics tried to block the line altogether using a variety of bogus reasons. Ironically, the delays caused by their environmentally damaging "protests" simply shifted oil movement to more dangerous rail transport.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News