• 2 minutes Oil prices going down
  • 11 minutes China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 16 minutes When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 49 mins Oil prices going down
  • 4 hours We Need A Lasting Solution To The Lies Told By Big Oil and API
  • 1 day Trump Hits China With Tariffs On $50 Billion Of Goods
  • 4 hours Another WTH? Example of Cheap Renewables
  • 2 days Bullish and bearish outlook for oil
  • 2 days Rolls Royce shedding 4,600 jobs
  • 3 days After Trump-KJU, Trump-Putin Summit
  • 59 mins What If Canada Had Wind and Not Oilsands?
  • 1 day When will oil demand start declining due to EVs?
  • 1 day Russia's Rosneft 'Comfortable' With $70-$80 Oil Ahead of OPEC Talks
  • 4 hours The Wonderful U.S. Oil Trade Deficit with Canada
  • 2 days U.S. Cars Will No Longer Need 55mpg Fuel Efficiency By 2025.
  • 3 hours The Permian Mystery
  • 8 hours China & India in talks to form anti-OPEC
  • 22 hours Gazprom Exports to EU Hit Record
  • 2 days Epic Fail as Solar Crashes and Wind Refuses to Blow
Petrochemicals: The Future For Big Oil

Petrochemicals: The Future For Big Oil

Saudi Aramco has inked a…

Azerbaijan’s Pipeline Conundrum

Azerbaijan’s Pipeline Conundrum

Azerbaijan’s European pipeline project is…

Enbridge Clears Minnesota Hurdle For Line 3 Replacement

Pipeline

Minnesota’s Public Utilities commission voted unanimously to approve the final environmental review of the proposed replacement of Enbridge’s Line 3 oil pipeline.

Enbridge has proposed to replace the existing infrastructure from Hardisty, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin – a 1,031-mile stretch that was originally installed in the 1960s. In the United States, Enbridge will replace the segment that runs from North Dakota through Minnesota to Wisconsin for a total US$2.9-billion. Line 3 is part of Enbridge’s Mainline pipeline network that carries the bulk of the 3 million bpd of crude that Canada exports to the United States. 

Last September, it ran into a surprising obstacle in the face of the Minnesota Department of Commerce, which said the environmental and socioeconomic risks of the Line 3 replacement project exceeded its potential benefits, adding that Enbridge had not made a sound case about the need for a new pipeline.

There is also the usual amount of environmentalist opposition to the replacement project, although Enbridge has explained that it plans to fortify the infrastructure by replacing the old steel pipes with ones made from stronger steel and restoring the pipeline’s capacity to 760,000 bpd. Line 3 has been carrying 390,000 bpd since 2010. The company’s pipeline system in Minnesota has a capacity of 2.9 million barrels daily.

Related: Is Another Oil Price War Looming?

The route for the section to be replaced in Minnesota passes through pristine waters in the Mississippi River headwaters area, and this fact has raised concern among local Native communities who are worried that a potential spill would damage lakes that the locals harvest wild rice from.

The native communities prompted a so-called traditional cultural properties survey to identify sacred sites along the proposed route of the pipeline but failed to convince the PUC to wait for the results from the survey before approving the environmental review. The commission said the survey must be completed before construction of the pipeline can begin.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News