• 4 minutes Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 7 minutes China's Economy and Subsequent Energy Demand To Decelerate Sharply Through 2024
  • 8 minutes Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 10 minutes US Shale: Technology
  • 13 minutes Which emissions are worse?: Cows vs. Keystone Pipeline
  • 17 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 2 hours Boris Johnson taken decision about 5G Huawei ban by delay (fait accompli method)
  • 3 hours Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 18 hours We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 11 hours Angela Merkel take notice. Russia cut off Belarus oil supply because they would not do as Russia demanded
  • 4 hours Might be Time for NG Producers to Find New Career
  • 15 hours Environmentalists demand oil and gas companies *IN THE USA AND CANADA* reduce emissions to address climate change
  • 18 hours Prototype Haliade X 12MW turbine starts operating in Rotterdam
  • 13 hours Swedes Think Climate Policy Worst Waste of Taxpayers' Money in 2019
  • 16 hours Wind Turbine Blades Not Recyclable
  • 16 hours Denmark gets 47% of its electricity from wind in 2019
  • 1 day Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
Oil Is The Only Way Back Up For Venezuela

Oil Is The Only Way Back Up For Venezuela

Venezuela’s economic and humanitarian crisis…

Oil Falls Despite Major Outage In Libya

Oil Falls Despite Major Outage In Libya

Oil prices fell on Tuesday…

Enbridge Clears Minnesota Hurdle For Line 3 Replacement

Pipeline

Minnesota’s Public Utilities commission voted unanimously to approve the final environmental review of the proposed replacement of Enbridge’s Line 3 oil pipeline.

Enbridge has proposed to replace the existing infrastructure from Hardisty, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin – a 1,031-mile stretch that was originally installed in the 1960s. In the United States, Enbridge will replace the segment that runs from North Dakota through Minnesota to Wisconsin for a total US$2.9-billion. Line 3 is part of Enbridge’s Mainline pipeline network that carries the bulk of the 3 million bpd of crude that Canada exports to the United States. 

Last September, it ran into a surprising obstacle in the face of the Minnesota Department of Commerce, which said the environmental and socioeconomic risks of the Line 3 replacement project exceeded its potential benefits, adding that Enbridge had not made a sound case about the need for a new pipeline.

There is also the usual amount of environmentalist opposition to the replacement project, although Enbridge has explained that it plans to fortify the infrastructure by replacing the old steel pipes with ones made from stronger steel and restoring the pipeline’s capacity to 760,000 bpd. Line 3 has been carrying 390,000 bpd since 2010. The company’s pipeline system in Minnesota has a capacity of 2.9 million barrels daily.

Related: Is Another Oil Price War Looming?

The route for the section to be replaced in Minnesota passes through pristine waters in the Mississippi River headwaters area, and this fact has raised concern among local Native communities who are worried that a potential spill would damage lakes that the locals harvest wild rice from.

The native communities prompted a so-called traditional cultural properties survey to identify sacred sites along the proposed route of the pipeline but failed to convince the PUC to wait for the results from the survey before approving the environmental review. The commission said the survey must be completed before construction of the pipeline can begin.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage


Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play