• 9 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 11 minutes The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 19 minutes Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 7 mins Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 4 hours Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 1 min Downloadable 3D Printed Gun Designs, Yay or Nay?
  • 1 hour Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 7 hours Saudi PIF In Talks To Invest In Tesla Rival Lucid
  • 5 hours CO2 Emissions Hit 67-Year Low In USA, As Rest-Of-World Rises
  • 16 hours How To Explain 'Truth Isn't Truth' Comment of Rudy Giuliani?
  • 14 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 12 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 17 hours Is NAFTA dead? Or near breakthrough?
  • 18 hours China still to keep Iran oil flowing amid U.S. sanctions
  • 17 hours Are Trump's steel tariffs working? Seems they are!
  • 8 hours Film on Venezuela's staggering collapse
Keystone XL Delayed…Again

Keystone XL Delayed…Again

The Keystone XL saga has…

The Productivity Problem In The Permian

The Productivity Problem In The Permian

The pipeline capacity crisis in…

Enbridge Clears Minnesota Hurdle For Line 3 Replacement

Pipeline

Minnesota’s Public Utilities commission voted unanimously to approve the final environmental review of the proposed replacement of Enbridge’s Line 3 oil pipeline.

Enbridge has proposed to replace the existing infrastructure from Hardisty, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin – a 1,031-mile stretch that was originally installed in the 1960s. In the United States, Enbridge will replace the segment that runs from North Dakota through Minnesota to Wisconsin for a total US$2.9-billion. Line 3 is part of Enbridge’s Mainline pipeline network that carries the bulk of the 3 million bpd of crude that Canada exports to the United States. 

Last September, it ran into a surprising obstacle in the face of the Minnesota Department of Commerce, which said the environmental and socioeconomic risks of the Line 3 replacement project exceeded its potential benefits, adding that Enbridge had not made a sound case about the need for a new pipeline.

There is also the usual amount of environmentalist opposition to the replacement project, although Enbridge has explained that it plans to fortify the infrastructure by replacing the old steel pipes with ones made from stronger steel and restoring the pipeline’s capacity to 760,000 bpd. Line 3 has been carrying 390,000 bpd since 2010. The company’s pipeline system in Minnesota has a capacity of 2.9 million barrels daily.

Related: Is Another Oil Price War Looming?

The route for the section to be replaced in Minnesota passes through pristine waters in the Mississippi River headwaters area, and this fact has raised concern among local Native communities who are worried that a potential spill would damage lakes that the locals harvest wild rice from.

The native communities prompted a so-called traditional cultural properties survey to identify sacred sites along the proposed route of the pipeline but failed to convince the PUC to wait for the results from the survey before approving the environmental review. The commission said the survey must be completed before construction of the pipeline can begin.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News