• 5 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 9 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 15 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 38 mins WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 11 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 1 hour These are the world’s most competitive economies: US No. 1
  • 38 mins The end of "King Coal" in the Wales
  • 17 hours Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 1 hour Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 7 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 8 hours Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 40 mins Coal remains a major source of power in Europe.
  • 21 hours COLORADO FOCUS: Stocks to Watch Prior to Midterms
  • 8 hours Poland signs 20-year deal on U.S. LNG supplies
  • 22 hours Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 18 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
Oil Price Rally Revives Offshore Oil Sector

Oil Price Rally Revives Offshore Oil Sector

The offshore sector was one…

The Oil Markets Are At A Confusing Crossroads

The Oil Markets Are At A Confusing Crossroads

The latest IEA report suggests…

Enbridge Clears Minnesota Hurdle For Line 3 Replacement

Pipeline

Minnesota’s Public Utilities commission voted unanimously to approve the final environmental review of the proposed replacement of Enbridge’s Line 3 oil pipeline.

Enbridge has proposed to replace the existing infrastructure from Hardisty, Alberta, to Superior, Wisconsin – a 1,031-mile stretch that was originally installed in the 1960s. In the United States, Enbridge will replace the segment that runs from North Dakota through Minnesota to Wisconsin for a total US$2.9-billion. Line 3 is part of Enbridge’s Mainline pipeline network that carries the bulk of the 3 million bpd of crude that Canada exports to the United States. 

Last September, it ran into a surprising obstacle in the face of the Minnesota Department of Commerce, which said the environmental and socioeconomic risks of the Line 3 replacement project exceeded its potential benefits, adding that Enbridge had not made a sound case about the need for a new pipeline.

There is also the usual amount of environmentalist opposition to the replacement project, although Enbridge has explained that it plans to fortify the infrastructure by replacing the old steel pipes with ones made from stronger steel and restoring the pipeline’s capacity to 760,000 bpd. Line 3 has been carrying 390,000 bpd since 2010. The company’s pipeline system in Minnesota has a capacity of 2.9 million barrels daily.

Related: Is Another Oil Price War Looming?

The route for the section to be replaced in Minnesota passes through pristine waters in the Mississippi River headwaters area, and this fact has raised concern among local Native communities who are worried that a potential spill would damage lakes that the locals harvest wild rice from.

The native communities prompted a so-called traditional cultural properties survey to identify sacred sites along the proposed route of the pipeline but failed to convince the PUC to wait for the results from the survey before approving the environmental review. The commission said the survey must be completed before construction of the pipeline can begin.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News