• 4 minutes England Running Out of Water?
  • 7 minutes Trump to Make Allies Pay More to Host US Bases
  • 10 minutes U.S. Shale Output may Start Dropping Next Year
  • 14 minutes Washington Eyes Crackdown On OPEC
  • 11 hours One Last Warning For The U.S. Shale Patch
  • 7 hours Modular Nuclear Reactors
  • 16 hours Once Upon A Time... North Korea Abruptly Withdraws Staff From Liaison Office
  • 7 hours Oil Slips Further From 2019 Highs On Trade Worries
  • 16 hours Chile Tests Floating Solar Farm
  • 7 hours Poll: Will Renewables Save the World?
  • 1 day China's E-Buses Killing Diesel Demand
  • 1 day Trump sells out his base to please Wallstreet and Oil industry
  • 1 day China's Expansion: Italy Leads Europe Into China’s Embrace
  • 6 hours Read: OPEC THREATENED TO KILL US SHALE
  • 2 days Russian Effect: U.S. May Soon Pause Preparations For Delivering F-35s To Turkey
  • 2 days Trump Tariffs On China Working
  • 2 days Biomass, Ethanol No Longer Green
  • 1 day New Rebate For EVs in Canada
Global Intelligence Report – 20th March 2019

Global Intelligence Report – 20th March 2019

The power balance in conflict…

The Most Important Technical Tool For Energy Traders

The Most Important Technical Tool For Energy Traders

Energy traders must constantly be…

Minnesota Deals New Blow To Enbridge Pipeline Project

pipeline

Minnesota’s Department of Commerce dealt a blow to Canadian pipeline-maker Enbridge with a report that said the replacement of the Line 3 pipe that runs through the state is unnecessary, as is the pipe itself.

Line 3 brings in crude from Canada to a terminal in Wisconsin and passes through northern Minnesota. Enbridge plans to replace the pipeline, which was built in the 1960s, with a new, extended one. This will cost some US$6.5 billion, but environmentalists and the state government believe it will threaten water resources in the area.

The Department of Commerce also believes that the current six-pipeline system that Enbridge runs in Minnesota is enough to accommodate the crude that the state needs over the long term, in light of estimates that show the demand for gasoline and other fuels is unlikely to increase, the department said, adding that local refiners operated near full capacity in any case.

Enbridge has countered the conclusions of the report saying that refiners and oil traders in Minnesota have declared the pipeline replacement necessary and that it will make its own review of the DoC report and present its case to the Minnesota Public Utility Commission. The PUC should decide on Line 3 by the end of April next year.

Related: Aramco Valuation Comes Under Scrutiny

Currently, Enbridge has a pipeline system with a daily capacity of 2.9 million bpd in Minnesota. Line 3 has been carrying 390,000 bpd since 2010, versus its capacity of 760,000 bpd for safety reasons. This is the grounds for Enbridge’s proposed replacement, but it sparked not just verbal opposition but also protests in Wisconsin, near the end-point of the new pipeline.

Some groups, apparently drawing inspiration from the wide-scale protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, hinted that Line 3 could be the next Dakota Access in terms of protests.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Artfldgr on September 12 2017 said:
    Looks like the politiicans want to make a disaster to make an excuse to blame pipelines... what else could be the reason to not allow a repair of a pipeline that needs it?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News