• 3 minutes Don't sneeze. Coronavirus is a threat to oil markets and global economies
  • 5 minutes Boris Johnson taken decision about 5G Huawei ban by delay (fait accompli method)
  • 9 minutes This Battery Uses Up CO2 to Create Energy
  • 12 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 4 mins Historian Slams Greta. I Don't See Her in Beijing or Delhi.
  • 6 hours We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 1 day Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 17 hours US (provocations and tech containment) and Chinese ( restraint and long game) strategies in hegemony conflict
  • 5 hours Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
  • 1 day Tesla Will ‘Disappear’ Or ‘Lose 80%’ Of Its Value
  • 19 hours Might be Time for NG Producers to Find New Career
  • 15 hours Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 1 day Environmentalists demand oil and gas companies *IN THE USA AND CANADA* reduce emissions to address climate change
  • 2 days Anti-Macron Protesters Cut Power Lines, Oil Refineries Already Joined Transport Workers as France Anti-Macron Strikes Hit France Hard
  • 2 days Angela Merkel take notice. Russia cut off Belarus oil supply because they would not do as Russia demanded
  • 2 days China's Economy and Subsequent Energy Demand To Decelerate Sharply Through 2024

Minnesota Deals New Blow To Enbridge Pipeline Project

pipeline

Minnesota’s Department of Commerce dealt a blow to Canadian pipeline-maker Enbridge with a report that said the replacement of the Line 3 pipe that runs through the state is unnecessary, as is the pipe itself.

Line 3 brings in crude from Canada to a terminal in Wisconsin and passes through northern Minnesota. Enbridge plans to replace the pipeline, which was built in the 1960s, with a new, extended one. This will cost some US$6.5 billion, but environmentalists and the state government believe it will threaten water resources in the area.

The Department of Commerce also believes that the current six-pipeline system that Enbridge runs in Minnesota is enough to accommodate the crude that the state needs over the long term, in light of estimates that show the demand for gasoline and other fuels is unlikely to increase, the department said, adding that local refiners operated near full capacity in any case.

Enbridge has countered the conclusions of the report saying that refiners and oil traders in Minnesota have declared the pipeline replacement necessary and that it will make its own review of the DoC report and present its case to the Minnesota Public Utility Commission. The PUC should decide on Line 3 by the end of April next year.

Related: Aramco Valuation Comes Under Scrutiny

Currently, Enbridge has a pipeline system with a daily capacity of 2.9 million bpd in Minnesota. Line 3 has been carrying 390,000 bpd since 2010, versus its capacity of 760,000 bpd for safety reasons. This is the grounds for Enbridge’s proposed replacement, but it sparked not just verbal opposition but also protests in Wisconsin, near the end-point of the new pipeline.

Some groups, apparently drawing inspiration from the wide-scale protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, hinted that Line 3 could be the next Dakota Access in terms of protests.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Artfldgr on September 12 2017 said:
    Looks like the politiicans want to make a disaster to make an excuse to blame pipelines... what else could be the reason to not allow a repair of a pipeline that needs it?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
Download on the App Store Get it on Google Play