• 6 minutes Trump vs. MbS
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 10 hours US top CEO's are spending their own money on the midterm elections
  • 7 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 7 hours The Dirt on Clean Electric Cars
  • 17 hours Petrol versus EV
  • 2 hours Satellite Moons to Replace Streetlamps?!
  • 12 hours OPEC Is Struggling To Deliver On Increased Output Pledge
  • 9 hours The Balkans Are Coming Apart at the Seams Again
  • 23 hours E-mopeds
  • 7 hours Uber IPO Proposals Value Company at $120 Billion
  • 10 hours A $2 Trillion Saudi Aramco IPO Keeps Getting Less Realistic
  • 14 hours 10 Incredible Facts about U.S. LNG
  • 13 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 1 day These are the world’s most competitive economies: US No. 1
Russia To Resume Gas Imports From Turkmenistan

Russia To Resume Gas Imports From Turkmenistan

According to Aleksei Miller, Gazprom’s…

The Implications Of A Fractured U.S., Saudi Alliance

The Implications Of A Fractured U.S., Saudi Alliance

With tensions between the United…

Minnesota Deals New Blow To Enbridge Pipeline Project

pipeline

Minnesota’s Department of Commerce dealt a blow to Canadian pipeline-maker Enbridge with a report that said the replacement of the Line 3 pipe that runs through the state is unnecessary, as is the pipe itself.

Line 3 brings in crude from Canada to a terminal in Wisconsin and passes through northern Minnesota. Enbridge plans to replace the pipeline, which was built in the 1960s, with a new, extended one. This will cost some US$6.5 billion, but environmentalists and the state government believe it will threaten water resources in the area.

The Department of Commerce also believes that the current six-pipeline system that Enbridge runs in Minnesota is enough to accommodate the crude that the state needs over the long term, in light of estimates that show the demand for gasoline and other fuels is unlikely to increase, the department said, adding that local refiners operated near full capacity in any case.

Enbridge has countered the conclusions of the report saying that refiners and oil traders in Minnesota have declared the pipeline replacement necessary and that it will make its own review of the DoC report and present its case to the Minnesota Public Utility Commission. The PUC should decide on Line 3 by the end of April next year.

Related: Aramco Valuation Comes Under Scrutiny

Currently, Enbridge has a pipeline system with a daily capacity of 2.9 million bpd in Minnesota. Line 3 has been carrying 390,000 bpd since 2010, versus its capacity of 760,000 bpd for safety reasons. This is the grounds for Enbridge’s proposed replacement, but it sparked not just verbal opposition but also protests in Wisconsin, near the end-point of the new pipeline.

Some groups, apparently drawing inspiration from the wide-scale protests against the Dakota Access pipeline, hinted that Line 3 could be the next Dakota Access in terms of protests.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


x

Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • Artfldgr on September 12 2017 said:
    Looks like the politiicans want to make a disaster to make an excuse to blame pipelines... what else could be the reason to not allow a repair of a pipeline that needs it?

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News