• 5 minutes USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 10 minutes Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 13 minutes U.S. Senate Advances Resolution To End Military Support For Saudis In Yemen
  • 16 minutes IEA Sees Global Oil Supply Tightening More Quickly In 2019
  • 5 mins Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 7 hours $867 billion farm bill passed
  • 7 hours Rage Without Proof: Maduro Accuses U.S. Official Of Plotting Venezuela Invasion
  • 1 day OPEC Cuts Deep to Save Cartel
  • 7 hours Has Global Peak Diesel Arrived?
  • 23 hours Sleeping Hydrocarbon Giant
  • 19 hours How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 1 hour What will the future hold for nations dependent on high oil prices.
  • 46 mins Air-to-Fuels Energy and Cost Calculation
  • 1 day And the War on LNG is Now On
  • 23 hours Could Tesla Buy GM?
  • 1 day Global Economy-Bad Days Are coming
Chevron Bets Big On Supergiant Oil Field

Chevron Bets Big On Supergiant Oil Field

U.S. supermajor Chevron continues to…

Big Oil Doubles Down On Shale Despite Price Drop

Big Oil Doubles Down On Shale Despite Price Drop

Despite depressed crude oil prices…

Court Allows Tesla Shareholders To Proceed With SolarCity Lawsuit

Elon Musk Tesla

A Delaware court on Wednesday allowed Tesla shareholders to move forward with a lawsuit claiming that Elon Musk and Tesla’s board used their influence and reputation to dupe shareholders into backing the US$2.6-billion acquisition of SolarCity, making a rough week for Tesla even worse.

The Delaware judge denied Musk’s legal team motion to dismiss, instead siding with the shareholders who have challenged the SolarCity deal after finding that they presented in their complaint “sufficient facts to support a reasonable inference that Musk exercised his influence as a controlling stockholder with respect to the Acquisition.”

The shareholders claim that Musk, as Tesla’s controlling stockholder, used “his control over the corporate machinery to, among other things, orchestrate Board approval of the Acquisition,” and that the acquisition “bail[ed] out” SolarCity thereby “spread[ing] across all of Tesla’s stockholders the loss that would otherwise be experienced only by” five individuals.

Tesla said that it does “not agree with the decision and will be taking appropriate next steps.”

“It’s important to emphasize that this was a motion to dismiss in which the court was required to assume as true all of the allegations that are made in the complaint,” CNN quoted a Tesla statement as saying. “We of course contend the allegations in the complaint are false,” Tesla said.

The court decision piles onto Tesla’s other woes this week, which had already battered the stock.

Earlier this week, Moody’s downgraded Tesla’s corporate family rating to B3 from B2 and cut its outlook on the company to Negative from Neutral in a blow made more severe by the launch of an investigation into a fatal Tesla crash.

Tesla’s stock is on track to post its worst monthly market performance ever, with shares down 24.86 percent month-to-date as of market closure on March 28.

Morgan Stanley warned on Wednesday that the stock is set for more volatility, but noted that “we are looking at one of the buying opportunities that many investors have been waiting for.”

“We see Tesla as modestly undervalued with very high risk,” Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas wrote in a note to clients.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News