• 6 minutes Saudis Threaten Retaliation If Sanctions are Imposed
  • 11 minutes Can the World Survive without Saudi Oil?
  • 15 minutes Saudis Pull Hyperloop Funding As Branson Temporarily Cuts Ties With The Kingdom
  • 2 hours WTI @ $75.75, headed for $64 - 67
  • 3 hours U.N. About Climate Change: World Must Take 'Unprecedented' Steps To Avert Worst Effects
  • 2 hours Saudi-Kuwaiti Talks on Shared Oil Stall Over Chevron
  • 37 mins Closing the circle around Saudi Arabia: Where did Khashoggi disappear?
  • 10 hours U.S. - Saudi Arabia: President Trump Says Saudi Arabia's King Wouldn't Survive "Two Weeks" Without U.S. Backing
  • 7 hours OPEC's No. 2 Producer Wants to Know How Buyers Use Its Oil
  • 8 hours Iranian Sanctions - What Are The Facts?
  • 3 hours UN Report Suggests USD $240 Per Gallon Gasoline Tax to Fight Global Warming
  • 22 hours How High Can Oil Prices Rise? (Part 2 of my previous thread)
  • 2 hours EU to Splash Billions on Battery Factories
  • 9 hours Superhumans
  • 6 hours Who's Ready For The Next Contest?
  • 7 hours China Thirsty for Canadian Crude
Carbon Pricing Won't Kill Big Oil

Carbon Pricing Won't Kill Big Oil

Big oil has agreed to…

Disappearance Of Saudi Journalist Could Rock Oil Markets

Disappearance Of Saudi Journalist Could Rock Oil Markets

The disappearance of Saudi journalist…

Court Allows Tesla Shareholders To Proceed With SolarCity Lawsuit

Elon Musk Tesla

A Delaware court on Wednesday allowed Tesla shareholders to move forward with a lawsuit claiming that Elon Musk and Tesla’s board used their influence and reputation to dupe shareholders into backing the US$2.6-billion acquisition of SolarCity, making a rough week for Tesla even worse.

The Delaware judge denied Musk’s legal team motion to dismiss, instead siding with the shareholders who have challenged the SolarCity deal after finding that they presented in their complaint “sufficient facts to support a reasonable inference that Musk exercised his influence as a controlling stockholder with respect to the Acquisition.”

The shareholders claim that Musk, as Tesla’s controlling stockholder, used “his control over the corporate machinery to, among other things, orchestrate Board approval of the Acquisition,” and that the acquisition “bail[ed] out” SolarCity thereby “spread[ing] across all of Tesla’s stockholders the loss that would otherwise be experienced only by” five individuals.

Tesla said that it does “not agree with the decision and will be taking appropriate next steps.”

“It’s important to emphasize that this was a motion to dismiss in which the court was required to assume as true all of the allegations that are made in the complaint,” CNN quoted a Tesla statement as saying. “We of course contend the allegations in the complaint are false,” Tesla said.

The court decision piles onto Tesla’s other woes this week, which had already battered the stock.

Earlier this week, Moody’s downgraded Tesla’s corporate family rating to B3 from B2 and cut its outlook on the company to Negative from Neutral in a blow made more severe by the launch of an investigation into a fatal Tesla crash.

Tesla’s stock is on track to post its worst monthly market performance ever, with shares down 24.86 percent month-to-date as of market closure on March 28.

Morgan Stanley warned on Wednesday that the stock is set for more volatility, but noted that “we are looking at one of the buying opportunities that many investors have been waiting for.”

“We see Tesla as modestly undervalued with very high risk,” Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas wrote in a note to clients.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News