• 5 minutes Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 11 minutes Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
  • 15 minutes WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 15 hours The EU Loses The Principles On Which It Was Built
  • 7 hours Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 11 hours Why hydrogen economics does not work
  • 8 hours Tesla Faces 3 Lawsuits Over “Funding Secured” Tweet
  • 8 hours Again Google: Brazil May Probe Google Over Its Cell Phone System
  • 49 mins Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 21 hours WSJ *still* refuses to acknowledge U.S. Shale Oil industry's horrible economics and debts
  • 42 mins Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 1 day Chinese EV Startup Nio Files for $1.8 billion IPO
  • 1 day Crude Price going to $62.50
  • 3 hours California Solar Mandate Based on False Facts
  • 20 hours Saudi Arabia Cuts Diplomatic Ties with Canada
  • 3 hours Oil prices---Tug of War: Sanctions vs. Trade War
The Real Reason Behind The Next Oil Squeeze

The Real Reason Behind The Next Oil Squeeze

An oil supply squeeze may…

Southern Company Just Raised Cost Estimates For This Megaproject Again

Southern Company Just Raised Cost Estimates For This Megaproject Again

Southern Company's subsidiary announced yet…

Court Allows Tesla Shareholders To Proceed With SolarCity Lawsuit

Elon Musk Tesla

A Delaware court on Wednesday allowed Tesla shareholders to move forward with a lawsuit claiming that Elon Musk and Tesla’s board used their influence and reputation to dupe shareholders into backing the US$2.6-billion acquisition of SolarCity, making a rough week for Tesla even worse.

The Delaware judge denied Musk’s legal team motion to dismiss, instead siding with the shareholders who have challenged the SolarCity deal after finding that they presented in their complaint “sufficient facts to support a reasonable inference that Musk exercised his influence as a controlling stockholder with respect to the Acquisition.”

The shareholders claim that Musk, as Tesla’s controlling stockholder, used “his control over the corporate machinery to, among other things, orchestrate Board approval of the Acquisition,” and that the acquisition “bail[ed] out” SolarCity thereby “spread[ing] across all of Tesla’s stockholders the loss that would otherwise be experienced only by” five individuals.

Tesla said that it does “not agree with the decision and will be taking appropriate next steps.”

“It’s important to emphasize that this was a motion to dismiss in which the court was required to assume as true all of the allegations that are made in the complaint,” CNN quoted a Tesla statement as saying. “We of course contend the allegations in the complaint are false,” Tesla said.

The court decision piles onto Tesla’s other woes this week, which had already battered the stock.

Earlier this week, Moody’s downgraded Tesla’s corporate family rating to B3 from B2 and cut its outlook on the company to Negative from Neutral in a blow made more severe by the launch of an investigation into a fatal Tesla crash.

Tesla’s stock is on track to post its worst monthly market performance ever, with shares down 24.86 percent month-to-date as of market closure on March 28.

Morgan Stanley warned on Wednesday that the stock is set for more volatility, but noted that “we are looking at one of the buying opportunities that many investors have been waiting for.”

“We see Tesla as modestly undervalued with very high risk,” Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas wrote in a note to clients.

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News