• 4 minutes Phase One trade deal, for China it is all about technology war
  • 7 minutes IRAN / USA
  • 11 minutes Shale Oil Fiasco
  • 16 minutes Swedes Think Climate Policy Worst Waste of Taxpayers' Money in 2019
  • 2 hours Indonesia Stands Up to China. Will Japan Help?
  • 4 hours We're freezing! Isn't it great? The carbon tax must be working!
  • 6 hours Trump capitulated
  • 9 hours Three oil pipeline projects inch toward goal-line for Canada
  • 14 hours The Libyan Oil in a Sea of Chaos, War and Disruptions
  • 1 day Trump has changed into a World Leader
  • 5 hours Gravity is a scam!
  • 7 hours Yet another Petroteq debt for equity deal
  • 4 hours US Shale: Technology
  • 21 hours Prototype Haliade X 12MW turbine starts operating in Rotterdam
  • 17 hours OIL & GAS LOSSES! Schlumberger Posts $10B Loss in 2019
  • 1 day Beijing Must Face Reality That Taiwan is Independent
  • 1 hour Thanks to Trump, the Iranian Mullahs Are Going Bankrupt
  • 2 hours Which emissions are worse?: Cows vs. Keystone Pipeline
Civil Unrest Threatens Miners Across The Globe

Civil Unrest Threatens Miners Across The Globe

Across the globe, civil unrest…

How Will The Libyan Oil War End?

How Will The Libyan Oil War End?

The war for Libya’s oil…

Carmakers Urge Trump-California Compromise On Fuel Economy Standards

Cali flag

Seventeen major automakers, including GM and Ford, are calling for a compromise between the Trump Administration and California on the fuel economy standards through one nationwide broadly supported final rule, in order to avoid regulatory uncertainty and “an extended period of litigation and instability.”  

In a letter to U.S. President Donald Trump, the major carmakers said that “What works best for consumers, communities, and the millions of U.S. employees that work in the auto industry is one national standard that is practical, achievable, and consistent across the 50 states.”

Last summer, the Trump Administration unveiled proposed rulemaking for rolling back Obama-era fuel economy standards. The proposed rulemaking is intended “to correct the national automobile fuel economy and greenhouse gas emissions standards to give the American people greater access to safer, more affordable vehicles that are cleaner for the environment,” the Department of Transportation says.

The plan is fiercely opposed by California, which says that the proposed weakening of the emission rules is a “brazen attack” on clean car standards.

Negotiations between the Trump Administration and California broke down in February this year after the White House discontinued discussions saying that “Despite the Administration’s best efforts to reach a common-sense solution, it is time to acknowledge that CARB has failed to put forward a productive alternative” to the proposed rule.

In March this year, reports emerged that the White House pressured automakers to support the Trump Administration’s proposal to roll back fuel economy standards, but car companies are wary of the uncertainty as California pushes back.

In the letter to President Trump dated June 6, the major automakers said:

“We encourage both the federal government and California to resume discussions and to remain open to regulatory adjustments that provide the flexibility needed to meet future environmental goals and respond to consumer needs.”

In a warning to the Administration, the carmakers said:

“For our companies, a broadly supported final rule would provide regulatory certainty and enhance our ability to invest and innovate by avoiding an extended period of litigation and instability, which could prove as untenable as the current program.”

By Tsvetana Paraskova for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Nemo Burger on June 07 2019 said:
    Simple, hold the road funding until they argee.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News