• 2 minutes Oil Price Could Fall To $30 If Global Deal Not Extended
  • 5 minutes Middle East on brink: Oil tankers attacked off Oman
  • 8 minutes CNN:America's oil boom will break more records this year. OPEC is stuck in retreat
  • 10 hours Here We Go: New York Lawmakers Pass Aggressive Law To Fight Climate Change
  • 17 mins The Inconvenient Truth Of Electric Cars
  • 2 mins Hard To Believe: UAE Will Work To Defuse Middle East Tension
  • 26 mins Oil Demand Needs to Halve: Equinor
  • 10 hours Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 2 hours Iran downs US drone. No military response . . Just Completely Destroy their Economy. Can Senator Kerry be tried for aiding enemy ?
  • 12 hours Ireland To Ban New Petrol And Diesel Vehicles From 2030
  • 12 hours Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 7 hours Solar Panels at 26 cents per watt
  • 5 hours The Plastics Problem
  • 20 mins Green vs. Coal: Bavaria Seeks Fast-Track German Coal Exit in Snub to Merkel Plan
  • 13 hours Wonders of Shale - Gas, bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 6 hours Huge UK Gas Discovery
  • 9 hours Hydrogen FTW... Some Day
  • 8 hours Section 232 Uranium
Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Premium Content

OPEC+ Has Only One Choice As Oil Prices Slide

The meltdown for oil prices came to a halt, at least temporarily, after Saudi Arabia signaled that the OPEC+ production cuts would be sticking around for a little while longer.

“We will do what is needed to sustain market stability beyond June. To me, that means drawing down inventories from their currently elevated levels,” Saudi energy minister Khalid al-Falih said, according to Arab News. He said that Saudi Arabia would “do what is needed” to maintain stability.

Oil prices have plunged by more than 13 percent in the last two weeks, a decline that al-Falih said was “unwarranted.” He added that there was an “emerging consensus among OPEC+ countries, to continue their work towards market stability in the second half of the year.”

When asked about the escalating U.S.-China trade war, as well as the prospect of yet another trade war between the U.S. and Mexico, and the resulting knock-on effect of a global economic slowdown on oil demand, al-Falih acknowledged the negative impact. “But you can be sure that we will be responsive,” he said.

The comments reinforce the likelihood that OPEC+ will roll over the production cuts when they meet in Vienna in a few weeks, extending the supply agreement for the rest of the year. The trade war, the cracks in the global economy, and the questions about demand make the choice a relatively easy one.

The bearish turn in the market comes even as Saudi Arabia added some supply in May to offset declines from Iran. According to Bloomberg, Saudi Arabia added 170,000 bpd in May, while Iran lost 230,000 bpd. Some smaller increases from Libya and Iraq fully offset the outages in Iran, helping to explain why the oil market softened in May despite the “maximum pressure” campaign by the U.S. on Iran. Meanwhile, Russia involuntarily chipped in a 76,000-bpd decline, owing to the contamination crisis along the Druzhba pipeline. Related: Oil Set For Worst Monthly Drop Since November

However, Saudi Arabia remains below its production limit as part of the OPEC+ deal, and Riyadh has been much more cautious about pumping more oil into a weakening market. It was always going to be difficult for Russia, which is more eager to increase production, to convince Saudi Arabia to abandon the production cuts after last year’s meltdown. But the latest nosedive means that the possibility of OPEC+ loosening the cuts has narrowed substantially.

“While tight fundamentals supported oil prices through mid-May, escalating trade wars and weaker activity indicators have finally caught up with oil market sentiment,” Goldman Sachs wrote in a note. The declines over the past two weeks were likely magnified by technical trading, as speculators had become overextended. The liquidation of speculative positions probably contributed to the swiftness of the selloff.

So, where do we go from here? OPEC+ will likely keep the cuts in place, which may prevent a full-blown glut, heading off a deeper slide. Supply outages, the prospect of further losses in Venezuela, Iran and Libya also will mitigate any surplus. Goldman Sachs says that prices “may recover from here,” although with heightened volatility. The big question now is how impactful the trade war will be on demand, and more broadly, by how much the global economy slows. Related: Iraq’s Ambitious Oil Plan Faces One Major Problem

The investment bank says that there are three big factors that are “mispriced developments” in the oil market – “the Permian debottlenecking, the supply response of low-cost producers and the IMO 2020 shift in bunker sulfur regulation.” New pipelines and new export capacity along the U.S. Gulf Coast should “lower the global marginal cost of production,” Goldman analysts argued. The addition of new U.S. supply, and its integration into the global market, should narrow the difference between WTI and Brent. Ultimately, that presents a “multi-year threat to the market share and revenues” of OPEC+ producers. As a result, Goldman sees Brent falling from $72.50 in the second quarter to $65.50 in the third quarter, and then down to $60 per barrel next year.

The prospect of higher U.S. shale output and weakening demand from the trade wars does not bode well for oil prices. In the short run, however, the OPEC+ production cuts should prevent a much deeper downturn.

By Nick Cunningham of Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Tripp Mills on June 03 2019 said:
    Is this what FINRA makes you do who apparently I have yet to figure out what they do other than they are supposed to be doing something like audits this month or last and supposed to be working to keep solid, transparent, etc. I give them an F at best given what I have experienced and the state of the markets - they need to be in front of CONGRESS ASAP!
  • Tripp Mills on June 03 2019 said:
    So now everyone should go look at congressman Ackerman questioning the SEC in 2008 and that's likely what they think of FINRA so i'd stay far away until we see them doing something other than wrecking the markets! Google Congressman Ackerman hearings - its awesome (likelty same discount brokerages were to blame however who knows).
  • Tripp Mills on June 03 2019 said:
    so let me continue - the discount brokerage trading operations at night are alive and well and have not learned their lessons - they need to be SHUT DOWN - they can't even pay dividends!
  • Old-Ruffneck Smith on June 04 2019 said:
    It's a 2 sided coin/good for consumer's as many states are arguing for tax increases. Other side of coin it is bad for the low bottom investors, meaning folks who are playing with futures with little back-up money and price slides of this nature hurt them. Those with the deep pockets aren't too worried, as I foresee a slight bit more correction, then is the time to buy as will only go up from there. My feeling is China trade-war won't go on forever and soon as the deal gets completed the market will up-swing. IMHO

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News