• 4 minutes Oil Price Editorial: Beware Of Saudi Oil Tanker Sabotage Stories
  • 7 minutes Mueller Report Brings Into Focus Obama's Attempted Coup Against Trump
  • 11 minutes Magic of Shale: EXPORTS!! Crude Exporters Navigate Gulf Coast Terminal Constraints
  • 14 minutes Wonders of Shale- Gas,bringing investments and jobs to the US
  • 41 mins Evil Awakens: Fascist Symbols And Rhetoric On Rise In Italian EU Vote
  • 46 mins Theresa May to Step Down
  • 4 hours Old - New Kim: Nuclear Negotiations With U. S. Will Never Resume Unless Washington Changes Its Position
  • 8 mins IMO 2020 could create fierce competition for scarce water resources
  • 29 mins Is $60/Bbl WTI still considered a break even for Shale Oil
  • 3 hours India After Elections: Economy And Hindu Are The First Modi’s Challenges
  • 14 mins IMO2020 To scrub or not to scrub
  • 5 hours Total nonsense in climate debate
  • 2 hours Apple Boycott in China
  • 1 min Devastating Sanctions: Iran and Venezuela hurting
  • 11 hours Level-Headed Analysis of the Future of U.S. Shale Oil Industry
  • 13 hours Apartheid Is Still There: Post-apartheid South Africa Is World’s Most Unequal Country
  • 227 days Epic Fail as Solar Crashes and Wind Refuses to Blow
  • 2 hours Compensation For A Trade War: Argentina’s Financial Crisis Creates An Opportunity For China
U.S. Energy Storage Capacity Set To Double This Year

U.S. Energy Storage Capacity Set To Double This Year

U.S. grid-connected energy storage capacity…

Can The Bull Run In Oil Markets Continue?

Can The Bull Run In Oil Markets Continue?

The market is currently trading…

BP “Promoted” Oil Spills To Australian Watchdog

offshore rig

BP downplayed the risks of an oil spill in the Great Australian Bight, and even suggested that cleanup efforts—in case of such a spill—would be a “welcome boost” to the local coastal economies, correspondence between the supermajor and Australia’s environmental regulator NOPSEMA has revealed.

BP quit the Great Australian Bight last year, passing the torch to Statoil. But now letters released under freedom of information legislation provide details about the company’s environmental plans for the region and are bound to spark outrage among environmentalists.

First published in Climate Change News, the letters suggest that BP had failed to properly address the extent of potential environmental damage in case of a spill and the impact on local marine fauna of drilling activities.

For example, Climate Change News writes, oil spill modeling submitted by BP to NOPSEMA two years ago had shown an oil spill could reach as far as New South Wales, polluting 650 to 750 km of coastline in a period of between 125 and 300 days. The watchdog questioned BP’s ability to gather the manpower and equipment needed for the cleanup of such a large area of coast, and it also asked the company to remove the “welcome boost” statement from its environmental plan.

Related: Yieldcos Are Back And Better Than Ever

All in all, the letters show that BP’s revised environmental plan for the Bight, submitted after NOPSEMA rejected its original one in 2015, fell short of requirements on 69 out of 88 criteria for approval. BP said that these letters reflect ongoing work by the company and the regulator to come to an agreement on BP’s preparedness to handle any undesirable events in the Bight.

When BP quit its drilling project in the Bight, it said it was doing so because of unfavorable economic conditions. Environmental activists agree: one former politician from the Australian Greens party told Climate Change News that taking care to minimize risks for the sensitive ecosystem on the Great Bight from the effects of oil and gas drilling would be “prohibitively expensive” for any company.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:



Join the discussion | Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News