• 2 days PDVSA Booted From Caribbean Terminal Over Unpaid Bills
  • 2 days Russia Warns Ukraine Against Recovering Oil Off The Coast Of Crimea
  • 2 days Syrian Rebels Relinquish Control Of Major Gas Field
  • 2 days Schlumberger Warns Of Moderating Investment In North America
  • 2 days Oil Prices Set For Weekly Loss As Profit Taking Trumps Mideast Tensions
  • 2 days Energy Regulators Look To Guard Grid From Cyberattacks
  • 2 days Mexico Says OPEC Has Not Approached It For Deal Extension
  • 2 days New Video Game Targets Oil Infrastructure
  • 2 days Shell Restarts Bonny Light Exports
  • 2 days Russia’s Rosneft To Take Majority In Kurdish Oil Pipeline
  • 3 days Iraq Struggles To Replace Damaged Kirkuk Equipment As Output Falls
  • 3 days British Utility Companies Brace For Major Reforms
  • 3 days Montenegro A ‘Sweet Spot’ Of Untapped Oil, Gas In The Adriatic
  • 3 days Rosneft CEO: Rising U.S. Shale A Downside Risk To Oil Prices
  • 3 days Brazil Could Invite More Bids For Unsold Pre-Salt Oil Blocks
  • 3 days OPEC/Non-OPEC Seek Consensus On Deal Before Nov Summit
  • 3 days London Stock Exchange Boss Defends Push To Win Aramco IPO
  • 3 days Rosneft Signs $400M Deal With Kurdistan
  • 3 days Kinder Morgan Warns About Trans Mountain Delays
  • 4 days India, China, U.S., Complain Of Venezuelan Crude Oil Quality Issues
  • 4 days Kurdish Kirkuk-Ceyhan Crude Oil Flows Plunge To 225,000 Bpd
  • 4 days Russia, Saudis Team Up To Boost Fracking Tech
  • 4 days Conflicting News Spurs Doubt On Aramco IPO
  • 4 days Exxon Starts Production At New Refinery In Texas
  • 4 days Iraq Asks BP To Redevelop Kirkuk Oil Fields
  • 5 days Oil Prices Rise After U.S. API Reports Strong Crude Inventory Draw
  • 5 days Oil Gains Spur Growth In Canada’s Oil Cities
  • 5 days China To Take 5% Of Rosneft’s Output In New Deal
  • 5 days UAE Oil Giant Seeks Partnership For Possible IPO
  • 5 days Planting Trees Could Cut Emissions As Much As Quitting Oil
  • 5 days VW Fails To Secure Critical Commodity For EVs
  • 5 days Enbridge Pipeline Expansion Finally Approved
  • 5 days Iraqi Forces Seize Control Of North Oil Co Fields In Kirkuk
  • 5 days OPEC Oil Deal Compliance Falls To 86%
  • 6 days U.S. Oil Production To Increase in November As Rig Count Falls
  • 6 days Gazprom Neft Unhappy With OPEC-Russia Production Cut Deal
  • 6 days Disputed Venezuelan Vote Could Lead To More Sanctions, Clashes
  • 6 days EU Urges U.S. Congress To Protect Iran Nuclear Deal
  • 6 days Oil Rig Explosion In Louisiana Leaves 7 Injured, 1 Still Missing
  • 6 days Aramco Says No Plans To Shelve IPO
Alt Text

OPEC Favors 9-Month Extension Of Production Cut Agreement

According to Reuters sources, OPEC…

Alt Text

Major Oil Traders See Upside For Oil Prices

The world’s oil trading majors…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

U.S. Oil Export Ban Unlikely To Be Scrapped Soon

U.S. Oil Export Ban Unlikely To Be Scrapped Soon

Whether or not the U.S. Congress decides to lift the ban on crude exports will largely depend on the trajectory of crude oil prices. Oil prices have been elevated for several years, with West Texas Intermediate (WTI) fluctuating a bit above and below the $100 per barrel mark, and Brent prices going for a few dollars more. These prices give Congress pause, with many members worried that allowing oil exports to move forward would lead to even higher prices, pressing the limits of what the American consumer would be willing to tolerate.

Crude Oil Prices
 Source: EIA

The crude export ban has been in place since the 1970’s and was originally enacted to fight high prices caused by the Arab oil embargo. The localized glut of oil experienced in various parts of the United States – largely because of a mismatch between production and infrastructure in certain areas – has contributed to the spread between WTI and Brent. This has created a division within the usually unified oil and gas sector, with producers aggressively calling for scrapping the ban and refiners supporting the status quo.

Related Article: U.S. Will Export Oil – Who Wins and Who Loses?

Senate Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Mary Landrieu (D-LA) and ranking Republican member Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) recently called on the Energy Information Administration (EIA) to conduct a detailed study of the effects of crude oil exports. “This is a complex puzzle that is best solved with dynamic and ongoing analysis of the full picture, rather than a static study of a snapshot in time,” they wrote in an April 11 letter to EIA Administrator Adam Sieminski. Both senators support a lifting of the ban. Senators Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Maria Cantwell (D-WA), both of whom are more skeptical of allowing exports to move forward, also want the EIA to study the issue, but with a focus on the impact on gasoline prices. The issue has become a prominent one on Capitol Hill as a wave of lobbying pushes the issue to the top of the Congressional agenda. At the same time, the ongoing crisis in Ukraine has given ammunition to export supporters.

But selling the American people on the idea will not be easy. There are few issues that incite the ire of voters more than a quick spike in gasoline prices, and the link between “shipping oil overseas” and higher prices could be an obvious connection in voters’ minds. While producers would rather talk about “job creation” and higher export earnings, scrapping the export ban would almost necessarily result in higher prices – that’s why there is a price differential between the two benchmarks in the first place.

As the Wall Street Journal points out, refiners are ramping up exports of petroleum products from the Gulf of Mexico, and gasoline prices could climb as inventories drop. The completion of the southern leg of the Keystone XL pipeline reduced the glut of oil in Cushing, Oklahoma, and refiners are using the oil to export refined products at an unprecedented level. Exports of refined products jumped by 10% in 2013 from a year earlier. With greater access to global consumers, oil futures have risen by 6.1% so far this year. In other words, more exports mean more demand, which could lead to higher prices at the pump. Liberalizing energy exports may or may not be good energy/economic/trade policy, but either way, it will be a political hot potato as consumers feel the bite.

Related Article: U.S. Oil Boom Makes Gas Cheaper, but not by Much

This is why, despite the momentum export proponents have built in recent months, scrapping the export ban may not come anytime soon. In a recent report, Bank of America doesn’t see the ban being removed anytime soon. “A full repeal of the crude oil export ban is at least five years away under most scenarios,” Francisco Blanch, the New York-based head of commodities research, said in the report. The only way that the move could be become more palatable for Congress, according to BofA, would be if crude prices dropped significantly. This would provide some political room to lift the ban since consumers would not feel the impact as much, and drillers would be even more desperate to find new markets for excess oil.

A collapse in oil prices is not entirely out of the question, with a surge in supplies coming from Iraq, Libya, and the United States. But, until that happens, getting Congress to lift the ban on crude oil exports is unlikely.

By Nicholas Cunningham of Oilprice.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News