• 2 hours API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 2 hours Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 3 hours EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 4 hours IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 5 hours Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 6 hours Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 7 hours Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 8 hours Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 15 hours WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 20 hours Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 24 hours China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 1 day Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 1 day India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 1 day India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 1 day Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 2 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 2 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 2 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 2 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 2 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 2 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 2 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 2 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 5 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 5 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
  • 5 days Kenya Cuts Share Of Oil Revenues To Local Communities
  • 5 days IEA: $65-70 Oil Could Cause Surge In U.S. Shale Production
  • 5 days Russia’s Lukoil May Sell 20% In Oil Trader Litasco
  • 5 days Falling Chinese Oil Imports Weigh On Prices
  • 5 days Shell Considers Buying Dutch Green Energy Supplier
  • 6 days Wind And Solar Prices Continue To Fall
  • 6 days Residents Flee After Nigeria Gas Company Pipeline Explodes
  • 6 days Venezuela To Pre-Mine Petro For Release In 6-Weeks
  • 6 days Trump Says U.S. “Could Conceivably” Rejoin Paris Climate Accord
  • 6 days Saudis Shortlist New York, London, Hong Kong For Aramco IPO
  • 6 days Rigid EU Rules Makes ICE Move 245 Oil Futures Contracts To U.S.
  • 6 days Norway Reports Record Gas Sales To Europe In 2017
  • 7 days Trump’s Plan Makes 65 Billion BOE Available For Drilling
  • 7 days PetroChina’s Biggest Refinery Doubles Russian Pipeline Oil Intake
  • 7 days NYC Sues Five Oil Majors For Contributing To Climate Change
Alt Text

Saudis Slash Oil Price To Save U.S. Market Share

Saudi Aramco has further reduced…

Alt Text

Iranian Protests Will Not Impact Oil Prices

Iran’s oil industry has remained…

Alt Text

Is The Current Oil Price Rally A “Head Fake?”

Oil prices have experienced a…

Peter Tertzakian

Peter Tertzakian

Peter is an economist, investment strategist, author and public speaker on issues vital to the future of energy. He has clocked over 30 years of…

More Info

The Boring Truth About Oil Prices


The outlook for 2018 oil prices is dull. A majority of pundits have now corralled their one-year forecasts into a narrow, “lower-for-longer” price band, with little disagreement.

A humdrum, fifty-dollar-a-barrel price outlook for next year is part of a recipe to stifle investment, mute production growth and burn off inventories. On a positive note, that’s what’s ultimately needed to cook up higher oil prices.

The Yawn Consensus

A few keystrokes on a Bloomberg terminal will get you a list of 24 recent oil price forecasts from institutional experts. On their own, none of them is worth more than a barrel of coffee, or a cup of oil (the latter is cheaper). The important information in the collective forecasts is the lack of variability.

Three years ago, when prices started to collapse, there was a wide divergence in opinion: some spoke of $20 for a barrel, others over $80. Now, there is little dispersion. A loose bell-curve of opinion for 2018 is centered on $US 52/B for the WTI benchmark with about plus-or-minus five dollars on either side (see Figure 1).

(Click to enlarge)

So, the outlook for 2018 is expected to look a lot like the narrow trading band seen in 2017, which means a lack of upside garners a big yawn from investors.

Investor Indifference

Investors in oil stocks like the ‘buy low, sell high’ cyclicality. Take that dynamic away and there is far less reason for them to play.

Related: 97-Year-Old Law May Be The Cause Of Higher Gas Prices

Accordingly, the money is leaving the markets. Canada’s S&P/TSX Oil and Gas E&P Index is down 20 percent year-over-year. This isn’t a Canada-only dynamic—the analogous American E&P Index is down by a sympathetic amount.

Annual financings (equity and debt) by Canadian oil and gas companies are still holding in the $15 to $20 billion range (see Figure 2), but this is deceiving. Over the past two years there has been a growing shift toward mergers and acquisitions (M&A). In most years M&A constitutes 10 percent of the total; yet for year-to-date 2017 over 70 percent of investor dollars have gone towards paying for property acquisition and consolidation. Deals led by the likes of Cenovus and CNRL have been headliners.

(Click to enlarge)

The portion of financings not tied to M&A deals has been on a major downtrend in Canada; from $20 billion in 2014, down to only $5 billion so far this year. There is no indication that a ramp up in financings is forthcoming in the latter part of ’17. Nor is there belief that 2018 will be any better; why would there be if oil price appreciation has been ruled out?

Spending More Than You Make, But Less So In 2018

Where does the money for drilling, completion and tying in new production come from? Answer: Cash flow from operations; asset sales; plus outside sources of investment capital. Until recently, it’s been a lot of the latter.

Last year, in 2016, when oil prices were really low, the upstream Canadian oil and gas industry (excluding the oil sands) spent almost twice as much as it took in. This amplified spending in excess of cash generation was possible thanks to capital providers who believed in price recovery.

This year, 2017, is still torqued to outside investment. Capital spending (an estimated $30 billion) is expected to represent a reinvestment ratio of 1.7x in excess of cash flow (an estimated $17 billion).

Next year poses a quandary: If the pundits are saying that commodity prices will be flat, then the industry’s cash flow will not change much from this year either. And so the lever for 2018 capital spending will be in the hands of investor sentiment.

Less Investment, Less Drilling, Less Production

By the time November board meetings roll around, the likelihood is high that oil and gas companies will pare back their 2018 spending relative to ’17. The big question is how much lower?

In the absence of price appreciation, a reinvestment ratio of above 1.5x is probably unrealistic; in Canada that means spending could fall by 10 percent or more next year.

This lower-investment, lower-spending dynamic is not exclusive to Canada. Already, several U.S. independents have reported pared back spending plans in their second-quarter discussions; their re-investment ratios are falling too.  Globally, only the best upstream plays are attracting capital as producing companies learn to live within their cash flow. More conservatism with respect to expending capital on new productive capacity is likely in 2018.

Related: Can Putin Bring Peace To The Korean Peninsula?

A Price Signal Gets Heard

For now, the cyclical oil business has gone flat. After three years of expecting volatility, investors are going home. It’s that type of weak, dull price signal that needed to be heard to arrest capacity expansion.

In time, it’s a signal that heralds a return to renewed cyclicality.

By Peter Tertzakian

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • the masked avenger on September 14 2017 said:
    High oil = dead economy. On the plus,side, high oil drives electric cars and alternative energy development which helps to punish big oil and quicker their irrelevance.
  • Don Clifford on September 14 2017 said:
    Higher oil prices means increased oil production. Alternatives are not efficient, reliable, or cheap.
  • John Brown on September 18 2017 said:
    Same old stuff. The fact is the glut of oil remains even as OPEC and associated countries have done all they can to idle capacity and reduce it. Everywhere you look more recoverable oil and gas supplies are being found and the cost of recovering them is going down, and the speed to market is increasing. Given the glut of oil on the market, the increasing idle production capacity, and increasing use of renewable non-carbon energy sources there is really no reason for oil to be at more than $30 a gallon, but everyone in the oil sector colludes to prop up prices. $50 a barrel oil won't solve the glut or idle capacity, but it will maintain the status quo which isn't all that bad. It will be interesting to see if the industry and everyone else will be able to cook up something in 2018 to boost oil prices even further.

Leave a comment

Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News