• 3 hours U.S. On Track To Unseat Saudi Arabia As No.2 Oil Producer In the World
  • 5 hours Senior Interior Dept. Official Says Florida Still On Trump’s Draft Drilling Plan
  • 7 hours Schlumberger Optimistic In 2018 For Oilfield Services Businesses
  • 9 hours Only 1/3 Of Oil Patch Jobs To Return To Canada After Downturn Ends
  • 12 hours Statoil, YPF Finalize Joint Vaca Muerta Development Deal
  • 14 hours TransCanada Boasts Long-Term Commitments For Keystone XL
  • 15 hours Nigeria Files Suit Against JP Morgan Over Oil Field Sale
  • 22 hours Chinese Oil Ships Found Violating UN Sanctions On North Korea
  • 1 day Oil Slick From Iranian Tanker Explosion Is Now The Size Of Paris
  • 1 day Nigeria Approves Petroleum Industry Bill After 17 Long Years
  • 1 day Venezuelan Output Drops To 28-Year Low In 2017
  • 1 day OPEC Revises Up Non-OPEC Production Estimates For 2018
  • 2 days Iraq Ready To Sign Deal With BP For Kirkuk Fields
  • 2 days Kinder Morgan Delays Trans Mountain Launch Again
  • 2 days Shell Inks Another Solar Deal
  • 2 days API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 2 days Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 2 days EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 2 days IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 3 days Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 3 days Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 3 days Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 3 days Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 3 days WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 3 days Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 3 days China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 3 days Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 4 days India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 4 days India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 4 days Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 4 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 4 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 4 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 4 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 4 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 5 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 5 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 5 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 7 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 7 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
Alt Text

Venezuela’s Parliament Outlaws Maduro’s Cryptocurrency

The opposition-run Venezuelan Parliament has…

Alt Text

Iran Sanctions Will Help China's Petro-Yuan

U.S. President Trump may soon…

Alt Text

China Is About To Shake Up Oil Futures

With China preparing to launch…

Gregory R. Copley

Gregory R. Copley

Historian, author and strategic analyst — and onetime industrialist — Gregory R. Copley, 70, has for four decades worked at the highest levels with various…

More Info

Can Putin Bring Peace To The Korean Peninsula?

Putin

Russian Federation Pres. Vladimir Putin September 6, 2017, began taking the initiative to control the “crisis” over North Korean strategic weapons, because Russia had more at stake in resolving the issue than perhaps any other nation-state.

There was strong evidence that Pres. Putin was working to orchestrate a breakthrough resolution of the challenge by the international community to the DPRK over Pyongyang’s growing demonstration of its nuclear (and possibly thermonuclear) and intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) capabilities.  

Pres. Putin’s initiative would discreetly circumvent the U.S.’ and the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) initiatives, and yet at the same time deliver what both of those powers had been seeking: a brokered peace accord between North and South Korea.

Such a deal would pave the way for Russia’s key objective, and one supported by Japan and South Korea: a stable and peaceful relationship between North and South Korea which would permit the construction of logistical lines (road and rail links) all the way up the Korean Peninsula, linking to the Russian railway network at Vladivostok, and then on to Western Europe. This would break the PRC’s monopoly on the “Silk Road” across Eurasia, and one which currently makes the Russian rail networks some 70 percent dependent on the PRC for their viability.

A “second Silk Road” across the North of Eurasia (through Russia) would limit the PRC’s control of the Continent, and would provide a major boost for the Russian, North Korean, South Korean, Japanese, and possibly the Republic of China (ROC: Taiwan) economies.

Related: The Next Step In Mexico’s Oil & Gas Privatization Push

North and South Korean diplomats were already on Russky Island, near Vladivostok, in the Russian Far East, by September 6, 2017, to attend the Eastern Economic Forum (September 6-7, 2017), which began a day after the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) Summit ended in Beijing on September 5, 2017. Delegations from Russia, the PRC, North Korea, South Korea, Mongolia, and Vietnam participated in the Eastern Economic Forum, along with international private investors.

South Korean Pres. Moon Jae-in, in Vladivostok on September 6, 2017, asked Pres. Putin for help in resolving the crisis with North Korea. And Russia, significantly, is the foreign power which Pyongyang trusts most. North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un is known to be chafing under the relationship he has with the PRC which, he feels, neither respects him nor North Korea, and only supports Pyongyang in order to keep it away from possible reunification with South Korea and to keep external powers (the U.S.) from gaining a foothold, again, close to the Yalu River border between North Korea and the PRC. Indeed, the USSR was the major ally of North Korea up to and including the Korean War, and the PRC only became involved in the Korean War when it appeared as though an existential threat existed with U.S. forces crossing the Yalu River and threatening nuclear war against the PRC.

The U.S. had, in early September 2017, been close to its “end game” with North Korea: that “end game” being actual negotiations to achieve what Pres. Putin was now attempting to achieve: a formal peace treaty between Pyongyang and Seoul to end the Korean War, and mutual recognition between North and South Korea with an end to South Korea’s demand for reunification of the Korean Peninsula. U.S. Secretary of State Rex Tillerson on August 22, 2017, held out the promise that the time was now ripe for direct talks with North Korea. That appeared to be derailed by the detonation of a 120kt nuclear or thermonuclear weapon on September 3, 2017 (the sixth and largest nuclear detonation on North Korean soil), and the launch of an unarmed North Korean ICBM overflying Japan on August 29, 2017. Related: How EIA Guestimates Keep Oil Prices Subdued

It was clear that Pres. Putin, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, and South Korean Pres. Moon were ready to go along with Pres. Trump’s proposed coup de main to achieve a sudden breakthrough and resolution with North Korea (a “Nixon to China” moment), but domestic U.S. political pressures appeared to be making it difficult for Pres. Trump to be able to engineer the move, given the build-up of demand in the U.S. for the total removal of all nuclear weapons and ICBMs from North Korea.

This opened the door for Pres. Putin to negotiate the peace deal between South Korea and North Korea in a move which would deprive Pres. Trump of that coup de main, to the relief of Beijing, going into the 19th Communist Party Congress, opening in Bejing on October 18, 2017. The PRC would lose a measure of control over North Korea, but it would still be neutral, and the U.S. would be deprived of a diplomatic victory and leverage.

By GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs Staff.

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Tom on September 07 2017 said:
    If Putin can show a greater return for the North Korean leader by joining the Silk Road 2 and development of an industrial base, say outsourcing some of South Korean jobs via direct competition then the possibility seems there. Certainly the people of North Korea could benefit but does the government want them too? Kim seems more self centered than a leader and perhaps would enjoy a life elsewhere. China doesn't want to lose the North as a border and pawn but may see new leadership as an essential ingredient for security within the Silk Road community.
  • alex on September 07 2017 said:
    Well, even in RF some former chechen terrorist is spitting in the face of this middget. He wouldn't know how to bring piece to his own nation. Needles to say that North Korea is way out of his reach.
  • Brandon on September 08 2017 said:
    Sure he can, by selling them oil at lower prices than China does today. This is what "diplomacy" means for Putin, in a nutshell. What Putin can not achieve, by the way, is to halt their advance in the nuclear weapon development program.
  • SPK on September 08 2017 said:
    Yes. Mr. Putin is genious in politics.
    Not like the WWF sponsor who has no quality and background.
    Putin is a real world leader who is trying hard to bring stability in Syria.
    Syria would have been in peices, If this guy wasn't there.
    If Russia could bring NK into a negotiation table, then current situation in the Korean peninsula will be changed faster than we think.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News