• 55 mins Higher Oil Prices Reduce North American Oil Bankruptcies
  • 3 hours Statoil To Boost Exploration Drilling Offshore Norway In 2018
  • 4 hours $1.6 Billion Canadian-US Hydropower Project Approved
  • 6 hours Venezuela Officially In Default
  • 8 hours Iran Prepares To Export LNG To Boost Trade Relations
  • 10 hours Keystone Pipeline Leaks 5,000 Barrels Into Farmland
  • 16 hours Saudi Oil Minister: Markets Will Not Rebalance By March
  • 21 hours Obscure Dutch Firm Wins Venezuelan Oil Block As Debt Tensions Mount
  • 1 day Rosneft Announces Completion Of World’s Longest Well
  • 1 day Ecuador Won’t Ask Exemption From OPEC Oil Production Cuts
  • 1 day Norway’s $1 Trillion Wealth Fund Proposes To Ditch Oil Stocks
  • 1 day Ecuador Seeks To Clear Schlumberger Debt By End-November
  • 1 day Santos Admits It Rejected $7.2B Takeover Bid
  • 2 days U.S. Senate Panel Votes To Open Alaskan Refuge To Drilling
  • 2 days Africa’s Richest Woman Fired From Sonangol
  • 2 days Oil And Gas M&A Deal Appetite Highest Since 2013
  • 2 days Russian Hackers Target British Energy Industry
  • 2 days Venezuela Signs $3.15B Debt Restructuring Deal With Russia
  • 2 days DOJ: Protestors Interfering With Pipeline Construction Will Be Prosecuted
  • 2 days Lower Oil Prices Benefit European Refiners
  • 2 days World’s Biggest Private Equity Firm Raises $1 Billion To Invest In Oil
  • 3 days Oil Prices Tank After API Reports Strong Build In Crude Inventories
  • 3 days Iraq Oil Revenue Not Enough For Sustainable Development
  • 3 days Sudan In Talks With Foreign Oil Firms To Boost Crude Production
  • 3 days Shell: Four Oil Platforms Shut In Gulf Of Mexico After Fire
  • 3 days OPEC To Recruit New Members To Fight Market Imbalance
  • 3 days Green Groups Want Norway’s Arctic Oil Drilling Licenses Canceled
  • 4 days Venezuelan Oil Output Drops To Lowest In 28 Years
  • 4 days Shale Production Rises By 80,000 BPD In Latest EIA Forecasts
  • 4 days GE Considers Selling Baker Hughes Assets
  • 4 days Eni To Address Barents Sea Regulatory Breaches By Dec 11
  • 4 days Saudi Aramco To Invest $300 Billion In Upstream Projects
  • 4 days Aramco To List Shares In Hong Kong ‘For Sure’
  • 4 days BP CEO Sees Venezuela As Oil’s Wildcard
  • 4 days Iran Denies Involvement In Bahrain Oil Pipeline Blast
  • 7 days The Oil Rig Drilling 10 Miles Under The Sea
  • 7 days Baghdad Agrees To Ship Kirkuk Oil To Iran
  • 7 days Another Group Joins Niger Delta Avengers’ Ceasefire Boycott
  • 7 days Italy Looks To Phase Out Coal-Fired Electricity By 2025
  • 7 days Kenya Set To Give Local Communities Greater Share Of Oil Revenues
Alt Text

Oil Prices Nosedive On Bearish IEA Report

Oil prices are cratering after…

Alt Text

OPEC Eyes $70 Oil

As Brent crude prices remain…

Should we Limit Speculation in the Oil and Gas Markets?

Should we Limit Speculation in the Oil and Gas Markets?

Let’s Play ‘Blame the Speculators’

Most people would probably agree that speculation in the oil and gas markets is hurting American consumers. Consider the case of Aubrey McClendon. Mr. McClendon is the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, where he sells natural gas for a living. Natural gas prices have now been pushed down — by speculators — to below $2 per million BTU. This is a drop of more than 80% from 2008 prices. With these depressed prices, Mr. McClendon will have a hard time ever matching his $112 million of earnings in 2008. Mr. McClendon’s livelihood has been hurt by speculators.

Of course Aubrey McClendon is not your average person, and he isn’t likely to garner much sympathy over the decline in natural gas prices — especially since it has benefited consumers. But I use that example to illustrate the point that speculation is not a one-way street where the average consumer always loses. One of the frequently cited causes of high oil prices is from speculation. In fact, I agree that speculation is helping drive up oil prices. However, there are underlying fundamentals at work as well; otherwise the same speculators who are helping drive up oil prices would be doing the same with natural gas prices. Yet those underlying fundamentals are often overlooked in the rush to blame the speculators for spiking oil prices.

Speculators Play the Game Both Ways

Speculation can drive prices in either direction. If there is a widely held belief that oil prices will be higher, the price of oil will be bid up. It’s the same reason that the share price of Apple rises: Investors speculate that the company will do well in the future and they drive up the price in anticipation of future value. In the case of oil, the most recent speculation is that trouble in Iran could remove a significant quantity of oil from the market, driving prices much higher.

But one has to look no further than natural gas pricing to see that this goes both ways. With natural gas below $2 per MMBTU, producers will struggle to make a profit. They are already cutting back on drilling. The sentiment is that there is a very big supply of natural gas, and so the speculators in that case have driven prices down very low — in this case saving consumers a lot of money. In the case of oil, the fear is that supplies won’t be sufficient to meet current demand.

Incidentally, politicians and consumers frequently ask “Why are oil companies ripping us off by selling oil for $100 a barrel?” But ExxonMobil also happens to be the largest natural gas producer in the U.S. Rephrase the question to ask “Why are oil companies giving us a break by selling natural gas at under $2 when they were selling it for over $10 five years ago?” — and you can start to see that they really don’t have much control over pricing. That is set by how much speculators and actual end users are willing to pay on exchanges like the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX).

Conclusion: There Are Limits to How Much Speculation Can Affect Prices

I am not suggesting that we shouldn’t limit speculation. I really don’t know the answer to that one. If you banned investment banks from participating in the oil markets, my assumption would be that it would cause somewhat lower prices when prices are high and somewhat higher prices when prices are low. It would probably knock off the extreme swings on either end. But my main point here is that speculation by itself is not to blame for high oil prices, and eliminating speculation is not going to fix the problem of high oil prices.

This column was prompted by Eric Bolling’s assertions on Fox News that he has the answer to high gas prices. For weeks he has been hyping his “secret plan” which he “guarantees” will reduce gasoline prices by $1 a gallon. (Steven Colbert recently skewered Bolling’s antics over his secret plan). It turns out that “limit the speculation” was his answer for reducing gasoline prices by $1 a gallon.

That answer itself certainly isn’t new and novel; many people have been pushing this long before Bolling brought it up. But it ignores the two important facts I have highlighted here: Speculation drives prices higher AND lower, and there are often fundamental issues of supply and demand that drive that speculation. And if you want to know the single biggest driver of high gasoline prices today, just look at the consumption growth in developing countries. Eliminating speculation isn’t going to address that issue. Eliminate speculation and today’s gasoline prices would still be high, just perhaps not quite as high. And natural gas prices would perhaps not be as low.

By. Robert Rapier

Link to Original Article: Cutting Through the Rhetoric on Speculators and Oil Prices




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Hans Nieder on April 20 2012 said:
    Thank you for an intelligent report, Mr Rapier...

    As for Eric "The General" Bolling (his aka on CNBC) I am extremely disappointed with his lack of understanding of the market place...Of all people, this not what I would have expected from him...

    I have ax a many, who are these speculators? Never have received an answer..

    Back in the 70's the brilliant Rep Gerald Ford, got CONgress to ban onions futures, because the market was 90% controlled by two traders...

    As a result, you have extreme swings in wholesale pricing, something that did not happen when there was a future market for them...

    The point is well taken, Mr Rapier, that the specs are never thanked when prices decline..

    Moreover, if a comod is appreciating and one thinks it will cost them, simply purchase a company's stock and benefit from higher prices..
  • SayWhat? on April 21 2012 said:
    Thanks Mr. Rapier, for a thought-provoking article. In it you wrote "If you banned investment banks from participating in the oil markets, my assumption would be that it would cause somewhat lower prices when prices are high and somewhat higher prices when prices are low." Is this not backwards? Aren't speculators presently buying when prices are low, thereby bidding prices up, and selling when prices are high, making a profit (and incurring the wrath of communists and Democrats) but also increasing supply and thereby bidding prices down? And wouldn't another well-intentioned law banning speculation screw things up, prompting the afore-mentioned communists and Democrats to demand yet another law to "regulate" the price swings previously dampened by the "greedy, evil" speculators? In the words of Patrick Henry in 1775, "Forbid it Almighty God!"
    Submitted for your consideration 2012-04-21,
    SayWhat?
  • Hans Nieder on April 22 2012 said:
    Well argued, SayWhat?! Regulations will be need to regulate the regulations...Each step graduates down, until you reach Hell..

    Lets put an end to this nonsense of speculating about speculators, which is driven by dribble from the indolent, ignorant and the deceitful...

    http://www.econbrowser.com/archives/2012/04/a_ban_on_oil_sp.html

    Speculators, we do not need any stinking speculators..

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News