• 5 minutes Desperate Call or... Erdogan Says Turkey Will Boycott U.S. Electronics
  • 11 minutes Saudi Fund Wants to Take Tesla Private?
  • 17 minutes Starvation, horror in Venezuela
  • 7 mins WTI @ 67.50, charts show $62.50 next
  • 9 hours Newspaper Editorials Across U.S. Rebuke Trump For Attacks On Press
  • 10 hours Mike Shellman's musings on "Cartoon of the Week"
  • 5 hours Permian already crested the productivity bell curve - downward now to Tier 2 geological locations
  • 15 hours Venezuela set to raise gasoline prices to international levels.
  • 5 hours WTI @ 69.33 headed for $70s - $80s end of August
  • 9 hours Batteries Could Be a Small Dotcom-Style Bubble
  • 15 hours Scottish Battery ‘Breakthrough’ Could Charge Electric Cars In Seconds
  • 22 hours Renewable Energy Could "Effectively Be Free" by 2030
  • 21 hours Corporations Are Buying More Renewables Than Ever
  • 11 hours Don't Expect Too Much: Despite a Soaring Economy, America's Annual Pay Increase Isn't Budging
  • 1 day Again Google: Brazil May Probe Google Over Its Cell Phone System
  • 12 hours France Will Close All Coal Fired Power Stations By 2021
Alt Text

Iran’s Latest Tactic To Save Market Share

Iran cut oil prices for…

Alt Text

Oil Prices Jump As Saudis Cap Oil Supply

Oil prices rose on Tuesday…

Alt Text

Oil Prices Hit 7-Week Low As Trade War Heats Up

Oil prices traded close to…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for the U.S.-based Divergente LLC consulting firm with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Pro-Extension Voices In OPEC Become Louder

OPEC

In a statement, the joint committee of seven oil ministers from the parties to the cut said that the deal could be extended for another six months, depending on how oil’s fundamentals look in June. An earlier version of the statement, however, had the committee recommending the extension, according to Reuters.

The committee, which was set up to monitor the progress of the cuts and compliance rates, met in Kuwait over the weekend to review the situation. Its members commended the participants for their high rate of compliance – 94 percent as of February – and urged them to strive for 100 percent.

It seems that even a maximum compliance rate won’t change prices much, as U.S. inventory builds and rising production from the shale patch continue to offset the cuts already made by OPEC and its partners. Moreover, not everyone is on board with the extension idea. Russia, for one, said it needed more data before it considered such a move.

The effect of an extension could achieve the opposite of what OPEC needs, which is consistently higher prices, preferably above $60 a barrel. Yet the moment the initial deal was struck and prices started to climb, U.S. shale boomers buckled down and worked to boost their output, offsetting the cuts.

A deal extension would probably lift prices from their sub-$50 level, and that would again motivate shale boomers to continue pumping more and more – U.S. total crude output is set to exceed 9.5 million barrels daily next year, hitting and average of 10 million bpd at the end of that year, according to the EIA. Related: Energy Market Deregulation: Be Careful What You Wish For

Still, the OPEC committee argued that the current dip in prices was caused by lower seasonal demand and refinery maintenance season. Prices should perk up after the end of this maintenance season, and crude inventories in floating storage should shrink, as well.

All OPEC ministers are meeting again on May 24, when the extension is likely to be discussed.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Johnny on March 27 2017 said:
    Extension is not enough.Market needs additional 1-1.5m cut.This OPEC production level with increasing US and non OPEC production is good for 40-50 $ per barrel what is not enough.60$ per barrel is magic number.We must reach 60$.OPEC must cut more and US increasing must slow down.It is very simple....or not.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News