• 2 hours API Reports Seventh Large Crude Draw In Seven Weeks
  • 2 hours Maduro’s Advisors Recommend Selling Petro At Steep 60% Discount
  • 3 hours EIA: Shale Oil Output To Rise By 1.8 Million Bpd Through Q1 2019
  • 4 hours IEA: Don’t Expect Much Oil From Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Before 2030
  • 5 hours Minister Says Norway Must Prepare For Arctic Oil Race With Russia
  • 6 hours Eight Years Late—UK Hinkley Point C To Be In Service By 2025
  • 7 hours Sunk Iranian Oil Tanker Leave Behind Two Slicks
  • 8 hours Saudi Arabia Shuns UBS, BofA As Aramco IPO Coordinators
  • 15 hours WCS-WTI Spread Narrows As Exports-By-Rail Pick Up
  • 20 hours Norway Grants Record 75 New Offshore Exploration Leases
  • 24 hours China’s Growing Appetite For Renewables
  • 1 day Chevron To Resume Drilling In Kurdistan
  • 1 day India Boosts Oil, Gas Resource Estimate Ahead Of Bidding Round
  • 1 day India’s Reliance Boosts Export Refinery Capacity By 30%
  • 1 day Nigeria Among Worst Performers In Electricity Supply
  • 2 days ELN Attacks Another Colombian Pipeline As Ceasefire Ceases
  • 2 days Shell Buys 43.8% Stake In Silicon Ranch Solar
  • 2 days Saudis To Award Nuclear Power Contracts In December
  • 2 days Shell Approves Its First North Sea Oil Project In Six Years
  • 2 days China Unlikely To Maintain Record Oil Product Exports
  • 2 days Australia Solar Power Additions Hit Record In 2017
  • 2 days Morocco Prepares $4.6B Gas Project Tender
  • 2 days Iranian Oil Tanker Sinks After Second Explosion
  • 5 days Russia To Discuss Possible Exit From OPEC Deal
  • 5 days Iranian Oil Tanker Drifts Into Japanese Waters As Fires Rage On
  • 5 days Kenya Cuts Share Of Oil Revenues To Local Communities
  • 5 days IEA: $65-70 Oil Could Cause Surge In U.S. Shale Production
  • 5 days Russia’s Lukoil May Sell 20% In Oil Trader Litasco
  • 5 days Falling Chinese Oil Imports Weigh On Prices
  • 5 days Shell Considers Buying Dutch Green Energy Supplier
  • 6 days Wind And Solar Prices Continue To Fall
  • 6 days Residents Flee After Nigeria Gas Company Pipeline Explodes
  • 6 days Venezuela To Pre-Mine Petro For Release In 6-Weeks
  • 6 days Trump Says U.S. “Could Conceivably” Rejoin Paris Climate Accord
  • 6 days Saudis Shortlist New York, London, Hong Kong For Aramco IPO
  • 6 days Rigid EU Rules Makes ICE Move 245 Oil Futures Contracts To U.S.
  • 6 days Norway Reports Record Gas Sales To Europe In 2017
  • 7 days Trump’s Plan Makes 65 Billion BOE Available For Drilling
  • 7 days PetroChina’s Biggest Refinery Doubles Russian Pipeline Oil Intake
  • 7 days NYC Sues Five Oil Majors For Contributing To Climate Change
Alt Text

Iranian Protests Will Not Impact Oil Prices

Iran’s oil industry has remained…

Alt Text

What Is Keeping Oil From Breaking $70?

The recent unrest in Iran…

Gartman: ‘’Crude Not Going Above $55 For Years’’

Dennis Gartman

In mid-January, everyone's favorite market indicator Dennis Gartman, made an infamous prediction when oil was trading in the mid-$30s, when he said that oil won't hit $44 again "in my lifetime" 

Sure enough, three months later, oil "killed" Gartman, or at least his credibility, when it jumped above $44.

(Click to enlarge)

We thought that Gartman had learned his lesson, and would avoid such bombastic forecasts in the future. Turns out we were wrong, and earlier today Gartman again appeared on CNBC, where he said that "investors shouldn't expect the commodity to break through $55 for a few years."

That said, Gartman just may be right on this one: he said that supply continues to outpace demand, adding that "despite recent optimism around talks between Russia and Saudi Arabia that could result in reduced output" Gartman doesn't see the supply issue easing.

Gartman's main focus has been on the oil futures curve, and that the contango has been widening as of late. Contango is the difference between oil contracted for near-term delivery and crude slated for delivery further in the future.

He also pointed out something else we agree with: "There will be no freeze of any consequence," Gartman said. "The contangos continue to widen, which tells you that there is an abundance of supply in the market. As long as the contangos continue to widen, as crude oil bids for storage, prices are going to head lower."

Another issue is shale output coming back online: "even if Russia and Saudi Arabia formally agreed to put a cap on crude production in the future, Gartman sees U.S. oil producers continuing to flood the market."

"It's only the utterly incompetent drillers who can't make money at these prices," said Gartman. "So, the amount of crude oil that's going to come out of the Bakken, out of the Permian, out of Eagle Ford, is just going to be very large." "The Saudis, the Iranians and the Russians have nothing they can say to us to tell us to stop our own production and we won't," he said.

Confirming this, last week the CEO of Pioneer Drilling Scott Sheffield admitted that oil wells in the biggest U.S. oil fields remain profitable even with crude prices below $30/barrell as of right now.

The so-called break-even price for drilling in the Permian Basin in Texas is “sub-$30” a barrel, Sheffield said during a Bloomberg Television interview on Friday. For shale drillers such as Irving, Texas-based Pioneer, “break-even” typically means operating costs plus a 10 percent or 15 percent return. Related: An OPEC Production Freeze Could See Oil Prices Rise To $60

As a result, Gartman believes that oil's supply concerns mean the commodity's price will be capped. "The reality is we're going to be stuck for several years between $35 on the low end, and $55 on the high," he said.

Going back to the topic of US shale, Gartman does touch on a valid point, namely that even if OPEC agrees on a production cut, it will have to be careful not to push prices too high so as to allow most of US shale to jump back in the pool: with many companies having already filed for bankruptcy and having a far leaner balance sheet, their all-in breakeven costs are substantially lower.

In fact, earlier today, the EIA said it had increased its 2017 U.S. crude output forecast to 8.51 million from previous month's est. of 8.31 million, based on “an assumption of higher drilling activity, rig efficiency, and well-level productivity than assumed in previous forecasts." Needless to say, any higher oil prices will only send US oil production, much of which is now hedged, higher.

OPEC appears to be realizing this. Overnight the WSJ wrote that OPEC delegates say they’re concerned that prices over $60 could result in a new surge of U.S. production.

Shale producers need prices above $60 to launch significant new production, Swiss oil consultant Olivier Jakob wrote in a note Tuesday. Within OPEC, “there is no interest to push crude oil prices” above that level, he wrote, since doing so could spark a new glut that could drive prices down all over again.

All of the above only covers the supply side of the price equation. Meanwhile, on the demand side we now find ourselves outside of peak driving season, but worse, demand from China is set to drop off substantially in the coming months due to the approaching capacity of China's SPR as well as the reduced demand from China's teapot refiners as reported yesterday.

As such, while we would not go so far as saying oil will not go above $55 for "years" - it likely will, as all that would take for that to happen is another massive short squeeze and HFT algo stop hunt, or simpler, a central bank announces it will start monetizing crude, something which sadly is all too possible in the current insane market - we tend to agree with Gartman's logic here. It just may be that Gartman's "forecasting" luck is finally changing.

By Zerohedge.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage


Leave a comment
  • Stainless_steel on September 08 2016 said:
    Well, I think Gardman will be wrong again. There are many political factors affecting oil price- the most Political affected commodity, which can not be forecasted "for years" as Gardman says. If he says for years, then he should have forecasted political situation for years as well. judging oil price with just contango for years is so ridiculous and for dummies that i dont wanna comment at all on that matter.
  • Jamie Frew on September 08 2016 said:
    Strange this myopic obsession with US shale. There are lots of other high-cost producers who's production is uneconomic at $55. Deepwater, North Sea & Canadian Tar Sands are all examples of projects which require huge cap-ex.
    However, the anemic drilling activity in the US shale fields indicates that large sections of these fields are underwater at current prices otherwise the 66% of land rigs would not be sitting idle.
    Talk is cheap, drilling requires expected cash flows in excess of financing costs.
  • zorro6204 on September 13 2016 said:
    This from the guy who said oil would never go above $44 in his lifetime.
  • Wondering One on September 17 2016 said:
    Gartman is a POS. And yet the talking heads at CNBC and the ilk will report his crap every time he opens his big, fat, worthless pie hole.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News