• 4 minutes Europeans and Americans are beginning to see the results of depending on renewables.
  • 7 minutes Is China Rising or Falling? Has it Enraged the World and Lost its Way? How is their Economy Doing?
  • 13 minutes NordStream2
  • 6 hours Monday 9/13 - "High Natural Gas Prices Today Will Send U.S. Production Soaring Next Year" by Irina Slav
  • 10 hours California to ban gasoline for lawn mowers, chain saws, leaf blowers, off road equipment, etc.
  • 14 hours "Here is The Hidden $150 Trillion Agenda Behind The "Crusade" Against Climate Change" - Zero Hedge re: Bank of America REPORT
  • 15 hours GREEN NEW DEAL = BLIZZARD OF LIES
  • 2 days An Indian Opinion on What is Going on in China
  • 2 days "A Very Predictable Global Energy Crisis" by Irina Slav --- MUST READ
  • 20 hours Nord Stream - US/German consultations
  • 2 days Can Technology Keep Coal Plants Alive and Well?
  • 3 days Two Good and Plausible Ideas about Saving Water and Redirecting it to Where it is Needed.
  • 3 days Succession Planning in Human Resources for Vaccinated Individuals in the Oil & Gas Industry
  • 5 days Perfect Energy Storm in Europe: turning our back on fossil fuels is easier said than done!
  • 2 days U.S. : Employers Can Buy Retirement Security for $2.64 an Hour
  • 2 days Storage of gas cylinders
ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge

The leading economics blog online covering financial issues, geopolitics and trading.

More Info

Premium Content

Gartman: ‘’Crude Not Going Above $55 For Years’’

In mid-January, everyone's favorite market indicator Dennis Gartman, made an infamous prediction when oil was trading in the mid-$30s, when he said that oil won't hit $44 again "in my lifetime" 

Sure enough, three months later, oil "killed" Gartman, or at least his credibility, when it jumped above $44.

(Click to enlarge)

We thought that Gartman had learned his lesson, and would avoid such bombastic forecasts in the future. Turns out we were wrong, and earlier today Gartman again appeared on CNBC, where he said that "investors shouldn't expect the commodity to break through $55 for a few years."

That said, Gartman just may be right on this one: he said that supply continues to outpace demand, adding that "despite recent optimism around talks between Russia and Saudi Arabia that could result in reduced output" Gartman doesn't see the supply issue easing.

Gartman's main focus has been on the oil futures curve, and that the contango has been widening as of late. Contango is the difference between oil contracted for near-term delivery and crude slated for delivery further in the future.

He also pointed out something else we agree with: "There will be no freeze of any consequence," Gartman said. "The contangos continue to widen, which tells you that there is an abundance of supply in the market. As long as the contangos continue to widen, as crude oil bids for storage, prices are going to head lower."

Another issue is shale output coming back online: "even if Russia and Saudi Arabia formally agreed to put a cap on crude production in the future, Gartman sees U.S. oil producers continuing to flood the market."

"It's only the utterly incompetent drillers who can't make money at these prices," said Gartman. "So, the amount of crude oil that's going to come out of the Bakken, out of the Permian, out of Eagle Ford, is just going to be very large." "The Saudis, the Iranians and the Russians have nothing they can say to us to tell us to stop our own production and we won't," he said.

Confirming this, last week the CEO of Pioneer Drilling Scott Sheffield admitted that oil wells in the biggest U.S. oil fields remain profitable even with crude prices below $30/barrell as of right now.

The so-called break-even price for drilling in the Permian Basin in Texas is “sub-$30” a barrel, Sheffield said during a Bloomberg Television interview on Friday. For shale drillers such as Irving, Texas-based Pioneer, “break-even” typically means operating costs plus a 10 percent or 15 percent return. Related: An OPEC Production Freeze Could See Oil Prices Rise To $60

As a result, Gartman believes that oil's supply concerns mean the commodity's price will be capped. "The reality is we're going to be stuck for several years between $35 on the low end, and $55 on the high," he said.

Going back to the topic of US shale, Gartman does touch on a valid point, namely that even if OPEC agrees on a production cut, it will have to be careful not to push prices too high so as to allow most of US shale to jump back in the pool: with many companies having already filed for bankruptcy and having a far leaner balance sheet, their all-in breakeven costs are substantially lower.

In fact, earlier today, the EIA said it had increased its 2017 U.S. crude output forecast to 8.51 million from previous month's est. of 8.31 million, based on “an assumption of higher drilling activity, rig efficiency, and well-level productivity than assumed in previous forecasts." Needless to say, any higher oil prices will only send US oil production, much of which is now hedged, higher.

OPEC appears to be realizing this. Overnight the WSJ wrote that OPEC delegates say they’re concerned that prices over $60 could result in a new surge of U.S. production.

Shale producers need prices above $60 to launch significant new production, Swiss oil consultant Olivier Jakob wrote in a note Tuesday. Within OPEC, “there is no interest to push crude oil prices” above that level, he wrote, since doing so could spark a new glut that could drive prices down all over again.

All of the above only covers the supply side of the price equation. Meanwhile, on the demand side we now find ourselves outside of peak driving season, but worse, demand from China is set to drop off substantially in the coming months due to the approaching capacity of China's SPR as well as the reduced demand from China's teapot refiners as reported yesterday.

As such, while we would not go so far as saying oil will not go above $55 for "years" - it likely will, as all that would take for that to happen is another massive short squeeze and HFT algo stop hunt, or simpler, a central bank announces it will start monetizing crude, something which sadly is all too possible in the current insane market - we tend to agree with Gartman's logic here. It just may be that Gartman's "forecasting" luck is finally changing.

By Zerohedge.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:


Download The Free Oilprice App Today

Back to homepage





Leave a comment
  • Stainless_steel on September 08 2016 said:
    Well, I think Gardman will be wrong again. There are many political factors affecting oil price- the most Political affected commodity, which can not be forecasted "for years" as Gardman says. If he says for years, then he should have forecasted political situation for years as well. judging oil price with just contango for years is so ridiculous and for dummies that i dont wanna comment at all on that matter.
  • Jamie Frew on September 08 2016 said:
    Strange this myopic obsession with US shale. There are lots of other high-cost producers who's production is uneconomic at $55. Deepwater, North Sea & Canadian Tar Sands are all examples of projects which require huge cap-ex.
    However, the anemic drilling activity in the US shale fields indicates that large sections of these fields are underwater at current prices otherwise the 66% of land rigs would not be sitting idle.
    Talk is cheap, drilling requires expected cash flows in excess of financing costs.
  • zorro6204 on September 13 2016 said:
    This from the guy who said oil would never go above $44 in his lifetime.
  • Wondering One on September 17 2016 said:
    Gartman is a POS. And yet the talking heads at CNBC and the ilk will report his crap every time he opens his big, fat, worthless pie hole.

Leave a comment




EXXON Mobil -0.35
Open57.81 Trading Vol.6.96M Previous Vol.241.7B
BUY 57.15
Sell 57.00
Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News