• 4 minutes Projection Of Experts: Oil Prices Expected To Stay Anchored Around $65-70 Through 2023
  • 7 minutes Oil prices forecast
  • 11 minutes Algorithms Taking Over Oil Fields
  • 14 mintues NIGERIAN CRUDE OIL
  • 1 hour UK, Stay in EU, Says Tusk
  • 13 mins Nuclear Power Can Be Green – But At A Price
  • 4 hours Socialists want to exorcise the O&G demon by 2030
  • 16 hours Blame Oil Price or EVs for Car Market Crash? Auto Recession Has Started
  • 5 hours Chevron to Boost Spend on Quick-Return Projects
  • 36 mins U.S. Treasury Secretary Mnuchin Weighs Lifting Tariffs On China
  • 13 hours Venezuela continues to sink in misery
  • 4 hours Maritime Act of 2020 and pending carbon tax effects
  • 7 hours What will Saudi Arabia say? Booming Qatar-Turkey Trade To Hit $2 bn For 2018
  • 1 day WSJ: Gun Ownership on Rise in Europe After Terror Attacks, Sexual Assaults
  • 1 day How Is Greenland Dealing With Climate Change?
  • 7 hours German Carmakers Warning: Hard Brexit Would Be "Fatal"
  • 1 day Trump inclined to declare national emergency if talks continue to stall - Twitter hides this as "sensitive material"
  • 5 hours Conspiracy - Theory versus Reality
Alt Text

Another Crucial Canadian Pipeline Runs Into Trouble

Yet another crucial Canadian energy…

Alt Text

Can Mozambique Avoid The Natural Resource Curse?

Mozambique is swimming in natural…

Irina Slav

Irina Slav

Irina is a writer for the U.S.-based Divergente LLC consulting firm with over a decade of experience writing on the oil and gas industry.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Can The U.S. Avoid The LNG Export Trap?

The United States began exporting LNG just two years ago, and last year it was already a net exporter of the fuel, despite a global glut. By the end of 2019, the EIA projects the total LNG export capacity in the country will reach 9.6 billion cu ft daily, and if all is utilized, the U.S. will become the world’s third-largest LNG exporter, after Qatar and Australia.

That’s good news for gas-focused energy companies. However, it’s worth noting that a lot of final investment decisions on this future capacity have been delayed for lack of long-term buying commitments. Also, since the U.S. is not the only one expanding its LNG export capacity, it remains to be seen how much of the capacity that gets built will actually be utilized. A third note that needs making here is that domestic gas consumption is also rising.

Let’s address these considerations one by one. First, the delay in final investment decisions on new LNG export capacity has to do with an abundant global LNG supply, and buyer’s preference for spot or short-term contracts. With so much gas for sale, it’s a buyers’ market, and buyers want the best deal, which is never a long-term deal.

So it makes sense that LNG investors are uneasy about committing billions for new LNG capacity when there is no long-term clarity about demand. Yet, it seems that short-term contracts will continue to dominate the LNG market, so they are probably something LNG companies just need to get used to.

Second, competition in LNG is intensifying. Qatar is boosting production to maintain its number-one spot on the global market. LNG project operators in Australia are ramping up production, and two more megaprojects are scheduled to start producing this year: Shell’s Prelude and Inpex’ Ichthys.

Prelude has an annual capacity of 3.6 million metric tons of LNG and Ichthys will produce 8.9 million tons of the fuel. For reference, 1 billion cu ft of natural gas equals about 21,000 metric tons of LNG, so that’s a lot of capacity coming on stream in Australia to compete with the U.S. producers. Related: Could This Be The Next Proxy War In The Middle East?

Third is the issue of securing stable natural gas prices for the domestic electricity generation market. Chuck DeVore from think tank the Texas Public Policy Foundation noted in a recent story for Forbes that the share of natural gas in the U.S. power generation mix will rise to 34 percent this year, but it could be more as coal-fired plants are getting retired ahead of schedule as they can’t compete with the cheap gas.

Cheap gas, then, needs to remain cheap, warns DeVore, to ensure the reliability of power supply for consumers, since 40 percent of costs associated with gas-fired power plants are fuel costs and any move up in the price of gas is immediately transferred to the end-user. If too much gas is sent abroad, this could actually lead to a domestic shortage, which is what happened in Australia recently. The Australian gas shortage is an important lesson for an emerging LNG exporter such as the U.S.

So, U.S. LNG producers need to be flexible, lower their costs further (that’s easier said than done but it’s essential), and keep in mind the domestic market. Also, they should keep their fingers crossed for the trade dispute between Washington and Beijing to get resolved as soon as possible: China is the third-largest buyer of U.S. LNG, after Mexico and South Korea.

By Irina Slav for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Alexander on May 16 2018 said:
    US LNG prices cap the price of Russian gas to Europe. The US price is $3 plus $1.50 transport. After ten years the transport becomes a sunk cost and a train of LNG tankers to Europe will be as inexpensive as a pipleline from Russia to Europe.

    Ukraine is an untapped source of LNG. Canada is another untapped source. Mexico and Venezuela lack the stable government necessary for investments, though they have resources in the ground. The Eastern Mediterranean has enough natural gas in the ground to supply Europe.

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News