• 4 minutes USGS Announces Largest Continuous Oil Assessment in Texas and New Mexico
  • 10 minutes IT IS FINISHED. OPEC Victorious
  • 16 minutes GOODBYE FOREIGN OIL DEPENDENCE!!
  • 2 hours Paris Is Burning Over Climate Change Taxes -- Is America Next?
  • 19 hours The Great Climate Change Swindle
  • 6 hours End of EV Subsidies?
  • 10 hours Price Decline in Chinese Solar Panels
  • 7 hours Maersk's COO statment.
  • 3 hours Trump accuses Google Of Hiding 'Fair Media' Coverage of him
  • 1 day S. Australia showing the way
  • 21 hours China Builds LNG Icebreaker
  • 1 hour EPA To Roll Back Carbon Rule On New Coal Plants
  • 1 day More OPEC Members May Leave
  • 24 hours Exxon buys green power.
  • 2 days Not only GM: Morgan Stanley Predicts Ford to Cut 25,000 Jobs in Overhaul
  • 1 day Feudalism: The Most Resilient System?
Alt Text

Are NatGas Prices About To Explode?

U.S. natural gas prices have…

Alt Text

Natural Gas Prices Fall Below Zero In Texas

Soaring oil production in Texas…

Alt Text

What’s Behind The Drop In Asian LNG Prices?

Asian LNG prices tanked on…

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham

Nick Cunningham is a freelance writer on oil and gas, renewable energy, climate change, energy policy and geopolitics. He is based in Pittsburgh, PA.

More Info

Trending Discussions

Trump’s Ultimate Move To Lower Gasoline Prices

President Trump is reportedly considering tapping the strategic petroleum reserve to lower gasoline prices in an effort to neuter a political threat ahead of key midterm elections in November.

Sources told Bloomberg that options are under consideration by the Trump administration, ranging from a minor 5-million-barrel test sale, a symbolic amount, to a more sizable release of 30 million barrels. A more aggressive option could entail a larger release, combined with coordinated stockpile releases from other countries. No decisions have been made.

“An SPR release would have a psychological impact on the market. It may not translate into lower gasoline prices, but it would immediately bring down crude prices, at least temporarily, until the market adjusts,” Joe McMonigle, senior energy analyst at Hedgeye Risk Management LLC, told Bloomberg.

“It’s unclear whether the U.S. will actually use the emergency inventories, but we can at least tell that they feel a lot of pressure from crude trading above $70,” Ahn Yea Ha, an analyst at Kiwoom Securities Co., said in a Bloomberg interview.

National gasoline prices are hovering just below $3 per gallon, the highest price in more than three years. However, the rally in crude oil prices has stalled and reversed over the past week, with Libya in the process of restoring the 800,000 bpd that had been disrupted. News of Libyan oil trickling back online led to a sharp selloff in crude prices last week.

Monday saw another steep decline in prices, and WTI is back below $70 per barrel. Saudi Arabia said that it would expand its production, offering more volumes to Asian buyers. Russia’s energy minister also said that the OPEC+ coalition could add more than the 1 million barrels per day that they agreed to in June, if needed.

Related: Do Crude Producers Really Want Higher Oil Prices?

Moreover, Saudi Arabia said that the OPEC+ group would no longer track compliance figures for individual countries as part of the production cut agreement. Instead, OPEC+ will follow a collective target. The shift will essentially give Saudi Arabia and Russia more room to take market share as production from Venezuela and potentially Iran continues to fall off a cliff.

Iran, of course, rejected the move, but Tehran’s opposition doesn’t have any practical weight on Saudi actions. In any event, Saudi Arabia is already way over its production limit of 10.06 mb/d, having produced an average of 10.49 mb/d in June. "Regrettably, unilateral behaviors in production increase by some member countries is weakening the very foundation of our organization," Iran’s oil minister Bijan Zanganeh wrote to OPEC’s president.

The plunge in oil prices over the past week – Brent is off nearly 8 percent since July 10 – will take some of the pressure off and likely reduce the urgency for the Trump administration to make a decision on an SPR release. There is a lag between movements in crude oil prices and retail gasoline prices, so the price at the pump may not drop for another few weeks. However, if crude prices fail to rebound from after the recent drop, consumers will feel the relief soon enough.

That doesn’t mean that the Trump administration will shelve the idea of releasing oil from the SPR. The SPR has historically only been used in the most extraordinary circumstances, such as war or natural disaster. Previous releases from the SPR include the Iraq war in 1990/1991, in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and after the disruptions in Libya in 2011.

Related: The New Oil Cartel Threatening OPEC

Politicians once feared the political fallout of using oil from the SPR in the absence of a genuine supply disruption – nobody wanted to be seen tapping the SPR for political purposes. But the political price of dipping into strategic stockpiles has declined significantly over the past decade, largely as a result of perceived abundance as U.S. shale production has soared.

The U.S. Congress has legislated SPR sales for budgetary reasons, undercutting the security rationale behind holding the stockpiles and significantly lowering the political bar that the executive branch needs to clear to release oil from the reserve. It is hard to imagine President Trump suffering political damage from using oil from the SPR and even harder to imagine the U.S. Congress doing anything to stop him.

Nevertheless, whether or not the Trump administration pulls the trigger on an SPR release will largely come down to what happens with oil prices over the next few months. Sources told the Wall Street Journal that a significant release would only come if oil prices rose much higher. For now, the administration is holding off.

By Nick Cunningham for Oilprice.com

More Top Reads From Oilprice.com:




Back to homepage

Trending Discussions


Leave a comment
  • Elmo Simmons on July 16 2018 said:
    I think an announcement of a planned release from the S.P.R. may have a negative effect and perhaps cause a panic. What if karma hits and the Gulf coast gets slammed by a big hurricane or there is trouble in the Middle East where supply gets impeded, the S*it could hit the fan fast. Any release from the S.P.R. at this time would be total mid-term politically motivated. If you look closely at the EIA last report it indicated that the S.P.R. already shrank by 18.9 million barrels. Price adjusted for inflation gasoline is at very low levels. What does $2.75 buy you these days a 6oz bag of corn chips in the US, down here in Nassau it is close to $5 for a back of corn chips.
  • citymoments on July 16 2018 said:
    With all due respects to the author, I would like to add the following perspectives for his considerations: 1. USA consumes about 18m barrels of crude a day, she has two major crude reserves - CI ( commercial inventory ), SPR ( strategic petroleum reserve by USA government).
    2. As we speak, CI is at 404m barrels, about 4% lower than 5 year average; while SPR is at 660m barrels which is 5% lower than the SPR of 2015. Put these number in perspective: At the daily consumption rate of 18m barrels, the CI will only last 22 days; while the SPR will last bout a month. 3. CI is a tool in managing the commercial market of crude consumption, SPR is a tool only for the government as the last resort for national disaster and emergency. 4. Crude price today at $72 a barrel, it only has economic implications to our general economy, though we are not at a national disaster or emergency, that is why the commercial inventory is there for, be used to provide the buffer for commercial market supply. Under no circumstance, SPR can be justified to be used to manage the commercial market unless CI has been exhausted. 4. During the year 2010 -2014, the crude price stayed between $90-$110 a barrel, except during the Libya crisis, SPR was never tapped to intervene the commercial market during that 5 years; so crude at $72 today, what is the justification, even to consider to tap the SPR ?
  • Bill Simpson on July 17 2018 said:
    The dumb oil consuming countries should have all established enormous reserve stockpiles over a decade, or so. Then used them against the OPEC countries when they tried to jack up prices by totally boycotting one OPEC member at a time, destroying their economy by a total oil blockade.
    They would have soon get the message. Same with food exports. Let's see them eat sand.
    Nice guys finish last.
  • Mamdouh G Salameh on July 17 2018 said:
    I fully understand President Trump’s motive for lower oil prices. He is a politician who wants his Republican party to win the next midterm elections of the US Senate and the US House of Representatives in November and therefore he doesn’t want rising oil prices to offset the benefits of the tax cuts he made.

    I also understand Russia wanting to increase production for a different reason. The overwhelming bulk of Russia’s oil production is produced by privately-owned companies with a small government stake. They have been investing heavily for the last few years so they now want a return on their investments. Moreover, Russia’s economy can now live with an oil price of $40 or less a barrel as a result of the diversification of the Russian economy since the oil crash in 2014.

    What I can’t understand is Saudi Arabia increasing oil production against the wishes of OPEC and also against the vital interests of its own economy and the economies of OPEC members just to help President Trump’s party win the November elections. Saudi Arabia and the majority of OPEC members need an oil price of $80-$100 a barrel to balance their budgets. Moreover, the Saudi economy was the most adversely affected as a result of the 2014 oil price crash.
    If Saudi Arabia believes that US sanctions on Iran are going to lead to a shortfall in Iranian oil exports leading prices to surge very high, then they will be confounded by the reality that the sanctions will fail.

    Their cosiness to the Americans is well documented. Since the discovery of oil in Saudi Arabia at the start of the 20th century, the Saudis have quenched American thirst for oil, financed their wars and done their biddings. Is it not time for them to start looking after their own interests and the interests of their own people and economy. They should realize that the United States is part of the problem for Saudi Arabia and not part of the solution. The US and Israel will drag Saudi Arabia and the whole Gulf region into a war with Iran that could be damaging to all of them. The Saudis should realize that the risk of American litigation against them vis-à-vis the 9/11 will always be like a Damocles’ sword over their heads.

    Dr Mamdouh G Salameh
    International Oil Economist
    Visiting Professor of Energy Economics at ESCP Europe Business School, London
  • Billyjack on July 17 2018 said:
    I hope he doesn't try to produce from the strategic reserve. Since none of the salt domes were ever pressure tested and half the "oil" injected was tank bottoms, it will really shock the market when it is discovered there's very little oil there.
  • Aghast on July 17 2018 said:
    There is a new strategic reserve in the United States, its called TX and ND.

    The SPR is from a time that no longer exists.
  • Aghast on July 17 2018 said:
    Trump cut our gasoline expense when he approved the Dakota Access Pipeline day one.
  • Thomas on July 19 2018 said:
    Mr. President, High Octane American Ethanol has the potential to significantly reduce American Gasoline Prices. So why is your Administration not taking greater advantage of this Ultra Clean American Fuel, for example by allowing year-round use of E-15 and higher ethanol blends? Instead of using more American Ethanol, America is importing gasoline from Saudi Arabia? Is this part of “Making America Great Again”?

Leave a comment




Oilprice - The No. 1 Source for Oil & Energy News
-->